I agree with Gasthoerer.
I didn't say this is a bad result, I said it's a bad presentation. Having a straight on comb through and straight on pics only with a comb holding the hair back tells nothing of the result.
Also, regarding the number of grafts used, that would be a fairly large area for 1200 grafts to make a significant impact on.
So here is my issue with it. Some dude comes on here for the first time, looks at this "result" and thinks, "I can get a low, straight, full hairline for 1200 grafts! I'm in!"
Then he goes to a consult with someone else and he gets quoted 2500, or the doc refuses the hairline he wants, and he is confused and doesn't understand why he is different. Or even worse, finds a doc to quote him 1200 grafts for a hairline like this and is bummed out with his result because it doesn't look as full as straight on pic with a brush holding the hair back looks.
It's not something I want to argue about. If someone disagrees and that one angle taken like is a good presentation, there is nothing I can say to change their mind anyway.