I believe that there are FUE clinics that are producing excellent results on a consistent basis. I also believe that these clinics are changing the lives of thousands of patients world wide every year. This should be the end goal of each clinic, namely to make as many patients satisfied as possible. I believe that we are seeing this with FUE. I believe that it is a procedure that is evolving and giving patients options. These are all positives, for anyone who suffers from hair loss. Finally, I disagree with the notion that FUE cannot be a standalone option for many people, even higher Norwood patients who may need 5,000-6000 grafts. We have seen this being done, time and again, successfully, by the best FUE practitioners. The results speak for themselves.
As for the yield, I will let this quote speak for itself: "a good FUE transplanter should be able to get at least very close to the same growth rate (as FUT) at least 80% of the time." I interpret this as meaning that 80% of those who have an FUE with a good FUE practitioner can expect a yield that is either higher, equal or slightly below FUT yield.
Even someone as experienced and knowledgeable as the forum moderator, David, was willing to travel to India to have an FUE procedure. I think this speaks for itself.
Just my two cents.