I also read Dr. Shapiro had a patient with mixed grafts. This sounds like couple fu's which I had that did not look natural.
Pat. This site is very conflicting, both with recommended Dr.s and techniques:
In conclusion, it is possible to achieve the appearance of naturalness and density on a consistent basis with natural follicular groupings called "follicular units". This method requires greater numbers of grafts and technical skill in order to achieve cosmetic density. But once the technical skill to perform this technique is achieved the look is invariably natural. The question is: Is the increased degree and consistency of naturalness produced with follicular units worth the effort and risk necessary to achieve the appearance of density, especially in the central area were grafts are less scrutinized.
Mini grafting in the central area using 3-5 hair grafts "cut to size" offers the practitioner and patient a faster, slightly more economical way to achieve coverage, and if performed skillfully can achieve nearly the same degree of naturalness as single follicular groupings. However, the caveats are several, and when not observed, the results are a step down from the Mercedes Benz of grafts, the follicular unit.
Other methods of transplantation group the naturally occurring follicular units into unnatural-appearing aggregations (clumps, tufts, plugs), always resulting in an unnatural tufted visibility of the final product, which requires multiple additional sessions to hide the unnatural appearance. Such restoration procedures include standard round or square plugs and all forms of minigrafts (round, square, triangular, oval slots, linear slits, strip grafts).
Please define MUG !!!