Let’s think about this…2 separate procedures would equate to 2,650 grafts per session (slightly under 3,000 apiece)….the level of trauma would be cut in half and the scalp overall would be in much better condition regarding swelling, bleeding, pain, etc, etc.
Approximately 15 years ago when custom sized blades became the favored instrument for creating recipient sites, many of the top surgeons began using them because custom blades were less invasive and the saggital sites could be made much smaller thereby paving the way for dense packing…this caught on like wild fire and soon the BUZZ in the online hairloss forums was guys wanting to get the highest packed numbers possible…but was that the best approach?…not necessarily.
More does not always equate to better results and I am referring more to overall yield…basically, the more incisions that are made into a defined surface area, the more or higher related level of trauma is induced…and when you raise the corresponding level of trauma, the yield can certainly decrease…the blood supply can also be compromised when too much dense packing is done.
Now having said all of this, I have no idea the specifics of your case and so all I am saying is that for me, I would limit how dense the grafting would be per procedure to maximize blood flow, minimize trauma, minimize scarring, things like that to improve or optimize the overall end result of each procedure.
Obviously everyone responds differently to trauma and this is my favored approach to be maybe more conservative…either way, I wish you the best results possible!