@transplantedphil
At the clinic (live consultation) they extracted 7 grafts, analyzed them and said: "they are not miniaturized, they are only short, it is your genetic"
One top surgeon that saw 10 tricoscope images said exactly the same thing.
He really took care of me, sending 2 very long mails.
I past attach what he wrote:
first mail
"I've never canceled a surgery midway because grafts were too short. I study the donor area beforehand to make sure the patient is a good candidate or explain why he is not a good candidate and treat for anything we can treat before booking surgery. Of course all surgeries can have complications, but I don't consider "short grafts" a reason to stop surgery. If there is miniaturization in the donor area, that can be seen by trichoscopy (again, before surgery). Short grafts are more difficult to work with, but in my experience, they can have as good a survival as bigger grafts. I just need to be more careful with them during implantation especially, since they need to be placed just right and tolerances are lower- From the macro aspect (your photos), your donor seems perfectly normal. Of course I didn't see it with the microscope. I also see that you're on long term finasteride, which helps to "cover" us from miniaturization in the donor area. At this moment, you seem like a good candidate to me".
Second mail (after I sent him tricoscope images)
"Looking at the photos, I must say I don't see anything wrong with your grafts. They are short (3mm), but they're not miniaturized. There is a difference between being small and miniaturized. Short grafts are just that way, it's just your genetics, your anatomy. Miniaturized grafts are grafts affected by androgens. And these grafts don't look miniaturized to me. And you are taking finasteride (I assume, 1mg per day?), right? And you improved after starting minoxidil even though you were already taking finasteride?"