Mountinvan

You should be happy. Looks like a NW1. Is Konior some sort of Houdini. His results never cease to amaze. Where would you touch it up? I would wait and keep that hair in storage IMHO.

Why would you go to Turkey if you have world class surgeons in your backyard? Konir?

It is difficult to compare with the clips---any befores without the clips?

Spanker--looks like you had a very nice result with Konior. I am wondering why you are not recommending him? Also how did you come up with 5,000 grafts left (possibly)--was it from his pics?:confused:

Inquiring minds want to see pics of the NW1 Corvettester;)

I would go with Reed, especially if you want to transplant into native hair. He is at the top of his game and it is a good game, indeed. Look at his recent post of a 27 year old; very refined result:)

I thought I was seeing things (or imagining things) about Prince Harry. I first noticed the crown issue at the Royal Wedding. At first, I thought it might be a bad hair day but it does seem to have progressed. He (Harry) ribs William about his hair, but those who live in glass houses.... Why would William not be able to get a HT? Is plastic surgery taboo for the Royals?

I assure you men (and women) care about their looks way past 50. Just think about Andy McDowell in those L'Oreal wrinkle commercials (PS she is over 50 and hot!)The young has no monopoly on self confidence and concern over personal appearance. Its amazing how naive the young are about what older people care about. They (the young) think they have a monopoly on vigor, sexual attractiveness, etc. They certainly do not have a monopoly on wisdom.

Spanker is spot on. I have no personal knowledge of either of these clinics, but it does seem to me they have different approaches and personalties. Consults can help sort that out. Its like picking between haagen dazs vs ben and jerry's.

I believe I owe chrisdav a response, especially since you seem to be asking for one--unless you are just being rhetorical in nature. You are right chrisdav about Corvettester ("C")--he obviously was unable to comment without impunity as the moderators intervened. I, for one, am glad that he is still able to participate (thank you moderators) but do not think it productive to get into a discussion of C's prior conduct. All I know is that he is a fellow hairloss sufferer and now 3x hair transplant veteran (both FUT and FUE). He is articulate and adds to the quality of the dialogue. Since he has personal experience with Dr. Dorin and views on his experience (good and bad), consideringht might find his feedback useful. I personally find C to be knowledgable and respect his opinions--good and bad. Considersinght is looking for "differences" and "feedback." Telling him to consult with both doctors is good advice, but doesn't really address his post since he is looking to others for their impressions. He can then form his " own" impression when he does the consults.

Both clinics get excellent results. Yes, there are some dissatisfied clients but that is the nature of these blogs---you can criticize with much impunity. HT results are also variable because of patient characteristics, expectations, etc. It is a tribute to the Drs that participate that they subject themselves and their work to broad scrutiny and review. (Yes I recognize the financial upside for Drs to participate)Some docs have thinner skins when it comes to criticism, but that is part of human nature? I recommend you look at Corvettester's posts. He used Dr. Dorin for both FUT and Fue. He is sporting quite the mane these days. He has investigated both of these doctors . You might want to PM him.

I can pretend to be rich so at least there is some hope. Come on guys women aren't that superficial. I know they could care less if you are out of shape,a bad dresser, or bald, but vulgar usually doesn't cut it. Corvettester doesn't suffer from any of those human frailties. He can even give Justin Bieber a run for his money (and he's got lots of hair and lots of $$$---a dynamite combo).

Check out Dr. Reed in La Jolla. Platinum award winner. Editor of HT Journal. A HT patient himself. Artistically and technically talented. Wonderful bedside manner. And the list goes on.....

I echo C"s sentiment that having more confidence from a full mane is worth the price of admission---not only in terms of $$$ but also having to perservere through 3 procedures. I am interested in C's perspective on why FUE is so much easier. Was it in terms of post-procedure recovery? Given the FUE was mainly tweaks, were you able to conceal the procedure after the redness died down or was it obvious for some time that you had some work done? Were you able to cover the donor area in the back with existing hair? Thanks again for sharing.

Who makes them for the stars?

I wish I was as comfortable in my skin as Corvettester is. My “hat” is off to him. If I had an “edgy “hairstyle that was a signature part of my personna I would be more apt to call attention to it. As it is, my signature “comb-over” is fortunately not all that noticeable any more. When I had my first FUT procedure, one of my co-workers noticed that my hair looked different. I was just 5 days post surgery and was having difficulty with the styling. I told him I just had a haircut. I am not sure he believed me, but I can honestly say that was the only comment early on. Later, when the growth became more noticeable (at least to me) my neighbor (who is very observant on most matters) remarked that my hair looked “different.” An acquaintance of mine actually asked me whether I had a face lift? Other than those 3 comments, I have not had any other feedback—except, of course, from my hair stylist. My take is that we are much more concerned about our appearance than others are. No doubt others have noticed, but for the most part people have short memories when it comes to hair. Have you ever noticed a lady changing her cut or color? I have, but don’t try to pin me down on exactly what has changed. When you first have a procedure, it may be a bit harder to conceal but much depends on whether you have existing hair that can cover it up and whether or not you are shaved. I, too, was concerned that I would look freakish, but my fears were unfounded. Fortunately we live in the 21st Century where talented docs can perform procedures that leave your hair looking natural and more dense. How much can be achieved depends on how good a candidate you are, how good your doctor is, and how big your bank balance is. Would I undergo FUT knowing what I now know? Absolutely---even if it meant telling everyone I know about my procedures. The transformation has been life changing. Wind is no longer my enemy, even though I still try to avoid the gusts out of habit. I look and feel more confident, more refreshed and younger. Corvettester is correct. We need not be ashamed or embarrassed by doing something positive for ourselves.

Very nice result. The Video helps illustrate the refined work.

Corv---awesome result. I had to look up Robert Pattinson to see who he was and yes he and you share great hair. I know you are working hard so hopefully you will soon be worth the $67 million he is reportedly worth.

deleted

Yep--great decision. HTs really do work--but choose the right Doc. Skill and artistry matters!

Don't you think your bad results with Epstein is influencing your negativity towards HTs? They (HTs) do have intrinsic limitations but the results can be (and have been) pretty spectacular for the right patient in the hands of the right Doc. You are correct about limited supply and the ability of that supply to give coverage, but much depends on how bald you are to begin with. In other words, just like in any other surgery, how satisfied you are depends on what kind of candidate you are to begin with and what your expectations are. If you are a good candidate with realistic expectations, you can have an excellent result from HTs. I did. My experience is that a good Doc (and I would venture to say that the group is more than 1% of Coalition docs) can with current technology make a significant, permanent cosmetic change in one's hair situation. I have seen those changes posted by H&W, Rahal, Reed, Shapiros, T&D, etc. I am looking forward to the day that limited donor supply will be solved. I agree on freeing your mind but that includes letting go of the shackles of past experiences. I have to agree with Future Doc on this one. Lets be fair and balanced so that good candidates with realistic expectations can benefit from the amazing progress that has been made in the HT field by the really good docs.

Recently read a thread where Janna said the Shapiros do not like to exceed 2cm in width? I take it different docs are comfortable with varying widths. I also assume the wider the strip the more aggressive the procedure and more likilihood of going beyond the safe zone. Am I right? What is a condervative width? Does it depend on the patient? How about length?

Are you having an in person consult?

I would have thought he might go for at least a thousand. There should be plently of donor left in the bank. It would seem full density could have easily been accomplished.

I, for one, find England's observation that he would prefer a confident surgeon to be a compelling one. It is not an inflammatory comment insinuating that certain HT docs are better or worse than others; only that some have more confidence in FUE than others. Does confidence mean better results? Time will tell. Skill is obviously a key factor in any event. As to the allegation that England claims to have more knowledge than Jotronic and Spex combined that is rubbish. I am confident of that.