Hi Swooping,
Thats very short sighted, I would imagine that the majority of patients SHOULD need to maximize their lifetime donor supply. I'm a lower NW, and around 4,000 total grafts for my 1st and 2nd HT procedures combined puts me in a solid position for the next decade hopefully. But as I have an average donor supply, that only leaves 2,000 - 3,000 grafts in the bank. If I progress to a higher NW, then I suspect I will be in trouble later on, and no, I will not just bank on BHT. If people really believe that they don't need to maximize their donor supply, then I feel very sad for folks who will find themselves tapped out later on. My experience from consultations with recommended surgeons, is to plan for the future, and that means treatment plans that utilizes grafts effectively, and saves a good number for future hair loss. Even the more aggressive surgeons such as Rahal took a long term view in my recommendation. Whilst I think we would all love to have generous lifetime donor supply of grafts, the start reality is a) the majority just dont, and b) its really difficult to truly know whether one won't progress to a higher NW. In fact I would be shocked if there are many recommended surgeons who would advise patients that they don't need to maximise donor supplies. Even H&W had a long-terms plan for me.
Sorry buddy, but I think you are dead wrong here