Mick from Farjo Posted June 11, 2013 Share Posted June 11, 2013 This is the second patient example of Dr Jose Lorenzo that i am presenting on here. Farjo & Spain's Injertocapilar in Joint Venture - News | Farjo | Hair Transplant | Farjo Hair Institute & Clinic | UK This result was achieved with two procedures of 3033+2002 units. The patient is in his late 40's and is using hair medications. Mick Patient coordinator for Dr. Bessam Farjo who is an esteemed member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 (edited) Absolutely amazing! I used this case as an example of fue being viable for high norwood patients. Stellar. Insane yield! Edited June 11, 2013 by Mickey85 The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member HARIRI Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 Mick from Farjo, you are KILLING us with these manual FUE results. For all members who think that FUE does not yield like FUT. Please have a look at these! OMG! Plug removal + Strip scar revision - Dr. Ali Karadeniz (AEK)- May 23, 2015 Plug removal + 250 FUE temple points- Dr. Hakan Doganay (AHD)- July 3, 2013 Scar Tricopigmentation- Dr. Koray Erdogan (ASMED)- May 3, 2013 2500 FUT (Hairline Repair)- Dr. Rahal- July 26, 2011 My Hair Treatments: 1- Alpecin Double Effect Shampoo (Daily) 2- Regaine Solution Minoxidil 5% (2 ml once a day) 3- GNC Ultra NourishHair™ (Once a day) 4- GNC Herbal Plus Standardized Saw Palmetto (Once a day) My Rahal HT thread http://www.hairrestorationnetwork.com/eve/164456-2500-fut-dr-rahal-hairline-repair.html[/size] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member SADbutTRUE Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 WOW,WOW,WOW , that is a amazing transformation for a high norword, and under 6000 grafts, GREAT JOB DOC, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Spanker Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 looks good. A what point was the photo in the red shirt taken? Is that grown in and wet after the second or first procedure? I am an online representative for Dr. Raymond Konior who is an elite member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. View Dr. Konior's Website View Spanker's Website I am not a medical professional and my opinions should not be taken as medical advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 Mick from Farjo, you are KILLING us with these manual FUE results. For all members who think that FUE does not yield like FUT. Please have a look at these! OMG! What is this FUT you speak of? Hehehe The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member chrisdav Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 Highly impressive. Ideally this is what every higher norwood patient would want. 2 poor unsatisfactory hair transplants performed in the UK. Based on vast research and meeting patients, I travelled to see Dr Feller in New York to get repaired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Slickers Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 Superb result. One of the best I've seen. Congrats to Dr Lorenzo Mick. As an aside though this FUE fanboy-ism is getting out of control. Does every good FUE result need to be cheered to the rafters and commented on as supporting the 'FUE debate' and a testimony to consigning the 'relic' that is FUT to the past?! Seriously. Aren't we all just guys trying to get our hair back in a way that best suits our own goals, circumstances?! It ignores the countless guys on here that have got exactly what they want with FUT (and then some in many cases). I have no desire to get into this debate, I'm just saying it's getting a bit mundane guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 Superb result. One of the best I've seen. Congrats to Dr Lorenzo Mick. As an aside though this FUE fanboy-ism is getting out of control. Does every good FUE result need to be cheered to the rafters and commented on as supporting the 'FUE debate' and a testimony to consigning the 'relic' that is FUT to the past?! Seriously. Aren't we all just guys trying to get our hair back in a way that best suits our own goals, circumstances?! It ignores the countless guys on here that have got exactly what they want with FUT (and then some in many cases). I have no desire to get into this debate, I'm just saying it's getting a bit mundane guys. I can understand your sentiments, sure. My comments were made in jest. Purely light hearted. The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Slickers Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 And that's cool. I'm all for light hearted and banter. I'm even more for people doing quality work, FUE or FUT. Anyway appreciate the cool reply. Peace out. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 And that's cool. I'm all for light hearted and banter. I'm even more for people doing quality work, FUE or FUT. Anyway appreciate the cool reply. Peace out. :cool: No worries, all the best. The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick from Farjo Posted June 11, 2013 Author Share Posted June 11, 2013 FUT,FUE as long as the patient reaches their goals, that is what really matters. Pictures 6 and 7 were taken at follow up stages from session one. Thanks for the feedback. Mick Patient coordinator for Dr. Bessam Farjo who is an esteemed member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Blake Bloxham Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 Fantastic results! Thank you for sharing. "Doc" Blake Bloxham - formerly "Future_HT_Doc" Forum Co-Moderator and Editorial Assistant for the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog, and the Hair Restoration Forum All opinions are my own and my advice does not constitute as medical advice. All medical questions and concerns should be addressed by a personal physician. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Bobilero Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 One of the best results ive seen. Mega dense from where he started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member KO Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 I can understand your sentiments, sure. My comments were made in jest. Purely light hearted. I understand you made your comments in jest, but a lot of the FUE v FUT debates remind me of heated battles between Android and iPhone fanboys. It's hard for me to see how someone can have such strong feelings. 3382 FUE Lupanzula http://www.hairrestorationnetwork.com/eve/185463-3382-grafts-lupanzula.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 I understand you made your comments in jest, but a lot of the FUE v FUT debates remind me of heated battles between Android and iPhone fanboys. It's hard for me to see how someone can have such strong feelings. There will always be debate when it comes to two products, methods, services etc. Lets not forget the years where FUE was dumped on for being 'overrated' or 'going back to the plug era'. I feel strongly about the topic because i had an unpleasant experience with strip, factors that are non existent with fue The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Cant decide Posted June 11, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 11, 2013 FUT and FUE both have their place in HT. Debate over My Hairloss Web Site - Procedure #1: 5229 Grafts with Dr. Rahal Oct, 2010 Procedure #2: 2642 Grafts with Dr. Rahal Aug, 2013 7871 Grafts http://www.hairtransplantnetwork.com/blog/home-page.asp?WebID=2452 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regular Member hairIcome Posted June 13, 2013 Regular Member Share Posted June 13, 2013 FUT and FUE both have their place in HT. Debate over Says Who? someone with a name like Can't Decide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted June 13, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 13, 2013 Says Who? someone with a name like Can't Decide Heheh Can't Decide is a gentleman and he is certainly allowed his opinion. I for the matter believe fue is a replacement for fut, as i believe fue has more advantages and less drawbacks. Thats my opinion. Anyone can disagree, with that, who am i to stop them? I do believe fut will diminish in the next few years and fue will be its successor as we are seeing more patients demand fue and better results coming from high norwood patients. The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Cant decide Posted June 13, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 13, 2013 Says Who? someone with a name like Can't Decide Ok, keep debating, I cant decide My Hairloss Web Site - Procedure #1: 5229 Grafts with Dr. Rahal Oct, 2010 Procedure #2: 2642 Grafts with Dr. Rahal Aug, 2013 7871 Grafts http://www.hairtransplantnetwork.com/blog/home-page.asp?WebID=2452 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Spanker Posted June 13, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 13, 2013 Heheh Can't Decide is a gentleman and he is certainly allowed his opinion. I for the matter believe fue is a replacement for fut, as i believe fue has more advantages and less drawbacks. Thats my opinion. Anyone can disagree, with that, who am i to stop them? I do believe fut will diminish in the next few years and fue will be its successor as we are seeing more patients demand fue and better results coming from high norwood patients. This may be true when prices drop and more doctors become skilled to where you can expect a result like this. Also, I think FUT will always be around until hair multiplication is mastered. You will always have to use both procedures to max out your donor until then. I am an online representative for Dr. Raymond Konior who is an elite member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. View Dr. Konior's Website View Spanker's Website I am not a medical professional and my opinions should not be taken as medical advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member chrisdav Posted June 13, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 13, 2013 My opinion is mixed really on this. 2 poor unsatisfactory hair transplants performed in the UK. Based on vast research and meeting patients, I travelled to see Dr Feller in New York to get repaired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member greatjob Posted June 13, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 13, 2013 Also, I think FUT will always be around until hair multiplication is mastered. You will always have to use both procedures to max out your donor until then. This is why FUE will never be a replacement to strip until donor regeneration or multiplication is a reality. I really wish it was, but people with average to below average density and advanced loss FUE can't provide enough grafts to give adequate coverage.. The large FUE cases are great and impressive but extracting 5000-6000 grafts via FUE is not a possibility for most patients. Just like extracting 11,000 grafts from strip is not a reality for most patients. I think pointing to the best case scenario as a reason why FUE should replace strip is a bit misguided. For someone like me with limited donor density and finer hair I doubt I could extract 3000 grafts with FUE and not experience serious donor thinning. With FUE the limitation on the donor supply is density alone, whereas with strip the limitation is density and laxity. I have poor density but I have very good laxity which has allowed me to extract more grafts than I ever could've via FUE, which means that FUE is not a replacement for strip simply a complimentary or alternative treatment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted June 14, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 14, 2013 . The large FUE cases are great and impressive but extracting 5000-6000 grafts via FUE is not a possibility for most patients. 5,000 grafts is not impossible for patients with average donor density. The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member greatjob Posted June 14, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted June 14, 2013 5,000 grafts is not impossible for patients with average donor density. It isn't possible for patients with average density and fine hair. My point was that if fue isn't the best choice for every single patient, then it's not a replacement for strip. It may be less invasive but it's not a replacement. Trust me a strip procedure is far from a walk in the park, many people downplay the experience, and the variability in scar healing is a big downfall. But if strip is still the best or only option for someone with lower density and advanced loss then it can't possibly be a replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now