duchaine

Did you have pre-op medicines? Anti-hystaminic and cortisone?

I had a free consultation with her and she was stunning. She is a very good person.

You are not using anti androgens, except a little bit of fina on your scalp.

From what I see, the apex of the angle should be closer to the Cantus of the eye. Turkish surgeons tend to draw this kind of hairline.

Great. You have been very lucky.

This is the HL I was talking about. Let apart personal presences, is it anatomically correct?

4 months

I needed an earlier surgery

I had a consultation with him but we didn't close the deal.

I agree, but to create an acute, it is mandatory to rebuild the lateral hairline (and sometimes, the temporal peaks). That is quite risky, because that area is the most difficult to recreate and even a minor error is very visibile. This is why I was asking if the other option is ok.

frontal hairline angles are something between 25 and 15°. Lateral hairline angles should be 15-5°. The directions of the hair should be like int he pic I attach. From what I see, your surgeon didn't respect this rules so I suppose that just adding grafts can't help.

a. the front-temporal angle When designing the hairline, the position and shape of the temple hair must always be considered. The temporal angle represents the “unzipping” of the hairline and the temple and should exhibit an angle in which the temple and the hairline roughly match in shape and in angle. This is why a “toupee” or a hair system can at times be easily spotted as unnatural. If the toupee extends forward without temple hair that matches it, it creates what is known as a “lid effect” and thereby may appear unnatural. The temple to hairline angle should closely match. If someone wears a hat to camouflage one’s baldness, all you have to do is look at the degree of temple recession to estimate how much loss that person has centrally along the hairline. When designing a hairline, always respect the relative position and shape of the temples. b. acute angle According to all the text-books I read, the front temporal angle is an ACUTE angle. The two arms of the angle (the frontal-hairline and the lateral hairline) create an acute angle (fig. 1) c. the hairline design I saw there are two ways create the "acute angle". The first: just draw two lines and create the acute angle. In this case, the surgeon needs to bring forward the lateral hairline (fig.2) The other one is:draw 3 lines. The lateral hairline is broken down in 2 lines. The first crates a 90° angle with the frontal hairline and the other one (the lower part) creat an acute angle with the frontal hairline (fig. 3) The good part of this solution is that the surgeon doesn't need to rebuild the lateral hairline/frontotemporal peaks 4. my question given that the first solution is 100% correct, is the second anatomically wrong?

Is that the natural shape of your hairline?

I have the double/triple of his hair and the freitas suggested 2000 FU. Wonder why!

I saw this kind of condition several times. Turkish hair mills have a big market in Italy. From my experience, you will improve but some scars will be visible forever.

I read several posts of yours. You were supporting clinics there are mutually competitive...So, that means that none of them is paying you. Let me guess.. the Turkish government is paying you!

Hi Belve, my 2 cents tip is stop to argue with this guy. He is the most moronic and unehtical person I have ever met on this board. From my personal experience, I never met a such stupid person before: he cut my statements to say that I was contradicting myself. But the statement he was cutting was there and everybody could read it! Can you image someone so stupid and dishonest at the same time? This thread says everything.

I searched in many forums and I the are different reports. I didn't love the end results.

For me it is really hard to find parameters to say who is the best. A 2000 UF hairline, where the doctor gets the best natural result possibile for an original NW 2-3 is it better than a 10.000 FU zarev HT for a NW 7?

@Melvin- Admin Considering that lighting is everything for my crown, what do you think is better in my case: tricopigmentation or hair fibers? Don't care to cover 100%, just avoid to appear bald and old under wrong lightings. Natural effect is more in important than coverage.

My fault, I forgot that you opened a specific thread. When I took the pics, I was so surprised to see what a difference can make just a 45° rotation!

Only 12 months old or even "promising" HT, that people got in the last 2-3-4 months?

same room, same natural lighting, the pics are taken 1 minute apart. I just rotated 45°

I think the frontal hairline is too wide. Do you have any pic with the hairline design?

Both or them are nice and kind. Bicer is one of the most ethical person I met in this indutry. Anyway, I decided not to go with cutodio, because I found only 1 report. I didn't go with Bicer because I don't like the results I saw!