duchaine

The give you dormicus. Google it. when you stay on the bed, you sleep. But it is very mild so when you are done, they wake u up and go!

Sedation is very risky but hlc has an anesthesiologist, so don’t worry. except you are allergic to lidocaine, topical anesthesia is a walk in the park

If you are 22, no way you should consider ht. i know what you feel (i wanted to have an ht but pekiner wrongly diagnosed me dupa, aborted my op and my 200 grafts went into the toilet) but be patient. Maybe you have some miniaturization, maybe not. But even if your hair are perfectly healthy, wait a decade.

Bs. Minoxidil is the best drug to improve thickness.

To discuss about this topic, you should study hl design in first place. if you want, I can suggest some readings so we can talk. if you get bored to read, search for some of my comments. df can’t design a legit frontotemporal angle. It is more than enough for me. his hl appear good when you see frontal pic (sometimes half of the face: only the foreahead and the hairline) but you can see all the flaws in side and 3/4 pics.

I can’t find good works from him but just desperate people blaming themselves for choosing him.

You have some miniaturization. Dutasteride (both oral and injected into the donor) can help a lot.

In not any particular order, I like couto (who doesn’t!? lol) hasson and Wong and keser (anatomically, his hairline are perfect). Konior is great too, but I just saw a dozen of his works.

I think that his hairlines are anatomically a disaster. I can show hundreds of his works and show all his flaws.

Dutsteride, finasteride, minoxidil (oral and topical) just to name a few.

it is very subjective. for example, many people think that de Freitas is very good for hairline but I really dislike his works.

before and after pic look exactly the same. Did you really have an HT? Or you are testing how knowledge?

take medication and book with a good surgeon with a great sense of aethtetic.

Because you could be a slow grower so you have still time to improve. if you have transplanted hair that are still in telogen, you risk to “kill them” if you get an ht now.

smoking on hair is overrated...

I had hard mewing and facial exercise during the first months after my HT (it was during the pandemic period and I had nothing to do at home...) and didn't cause any problem. So, I think that TMJ was not a co-factor for poor growth. IMHO, the truth is that bad HT sometimes happens. What makes a difference is how the clinic handles the situation. Happy to see that they will try to fix your problem.

great!!!

Can you show researches to support both of your statements? testosterone seems to have very low impact on aga and the crown poor blood flow is, at the moment, a urban legend.

14.000 at virgin scalp?!

I don’t support the scalp tension theory and my question is not intended to say it is right. Does dr reddy support this statement with published research or on his own experience?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33911409/#:~:text=The 4 year follow up,permanently for all the subjects. it is even worse than I forgot

From my readings (I can't find a research on this specific topic), the answer is more complex than yes or no. Angiogenesis (creation of new capillaries) is related to anagen. So, you need blood flow to stimulate anagen but you need anagen to stimulate blood flow ( https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10771470/ ) This is why, when the hair is lost for many years (temple area), it is very very hard to get your hair back using medications. You don't have a follicle there to stimulated angiogenesis. By the other side, considering that the crown is not totally bald in many cases, you have some capillaries there to activate the anagen and activate the "virtuous" loop "anagen-agiogenesis". When you transplant a follicle, I suppose it is a completely different story. If you transplant both in crown and temples and presuming that you don't have hair for a very long period of time, angiogenesis will occur faster in temples, because there are more veins and arteries running in that area, so it is a "simple" process.

Transplanted for sure. I didn't have transplanted where I lost. That theory is not supported by anything. It is just a claim from a famous surgeon that sounds like this "the other surgeons are not good. I'm able to handle your hair so well that, if you get your Ht with me, your hair will live forever". The theory that 70% of people lose transplanted hair in 4 years is supported by scientific datas. Sometime ago I published the paper where the authors suggest 3-4 mechanisms to explain the phenomenon.

The fact that XIMENA is an honest and ethic person doesn't mean that her results are great. She is a good but her results are not great. Custodio has ONE real report worldwide. All his other works are from his IG and YT and some of them are bad.

If I was you and had your age, I would spend one years on strong medication and, in the meantime, would book with a GREAT surgeon to have a nicer hairline.