Jump to content

VicTNYC

Senior Member
  • Posts

    478
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by VicTNYC

  1. Hey man, I would cancel any Ht plans, your hair looks great at the moment, there’s no need for perfection now because you could be doing more damage than good since you have a lot of native hair, you could find your self being obsessively ocd with any procedure you do at this point. I would wait until I saw much more hair loss down the road if I were you, save your money and good grafts for later on.

  2. 9 hours ago, Mycroft said:

    There's no conclusive evidence that it does, and anecdotally I didn't notice much of a difference in hair fall after starting creatine. However, I have also been on Finasteride most of that time and that may have had some impact.

    My theory: if normal creatine dosages are linked to elevated DHT, creatine might accelerate your hair loss if DHT is the primary culprit behind your MPB. However, as we have established multiple times with DHT inhibitors, DHT is not necessarily the lone cause in many cases of MPB.

    I’m more inclined to believe that Prostaglandin D2 is much more damaging to hair than DHT.

  3. To trust a pharmaceutical corporation to submit 100% true and accurate data on a drug they sell and promote, based on studies they pay for and sponsor then get the approval to sell said drug by lobbying ($$$$) those in a government agency....Then...I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you real cheap.

    Its very common for pharmaceutical corporations to cherry-pick which data they like, submit and publish from the studies they pay for to get favorable approval, in fact, many doctors & scientists have said so as whistleblowers.

    I don’t believe for a second that their claims that the side effect percentage it’s quite low.

  4. 32 minutes ago, jonnyalex said:

    I will try to provide some. I have recently said I was unhappy with the work he did, but having looked back at my before photos, it is hard to complain about a dodgy hairline when the rest the work was pretty great. 

    Please do, it could be very helpful to share before, during, and after photos you may have that had you feeling unhappy then to feeling the work was as you say, pretty great.

  5. 1 minute ago, Spanker said:

    Stick and place is as I described. 

    There is plenty of research on time out of body and graft survival. There isnt a ton of research on what you posted.   The fact is that top docs are getting 95 percent or greater yield, so I do not think you will see markedly better yield.

     

    The biggest challenge to transplantation these days is your limited donor. Everything else seems like they have it figured out. 

    Gotchya, thanks!

  6. 1 hour ago, Spanker said:

    Im not following the comparison.  Stick and place does not refer to how long the grafts is out of body, but how long the incision is open before a graft is placed.  If basically means there isn't a bunch of pre-made recipient cites being made, but each site is carefully made and then filled. 

    Are you sure? 

    I watched @Melvin-Moderator Recent Dr visit video and the doctor said he creates the sites first then after starts doing the extractions and only gives about a 5-minute window of the grafts being out of the body before they are implanted into the already made sites...

    Am wondering if grafts being immediately placed via S&T vs being in a solution for say 30 minuets or more is superior to graft survival and growth success.

×
×
  • Create New...