hairman4321

this should look great, good luck

i've got the same in mine although i'm only at 2 months. i'm thinking those long hairs are the ones that just didn't shed, and wont. theres no density because the vast majority of hairs do shed then only start regrowing 3+ months later. looks that way for every other thread i've seen, so i don't think we need to worry any time soon

Around 2 months now. Nothing to report really, haven't had any growth yet - as expected. Time seems to pass slower during this period. Not all the grafts fell out, and the ones that remain are getting longer but there is very little density. Skin is still red. No numbness in the recipient of the donor. Still using topical DUT and nitrowood blood flow supplement. Optimistic for month 3 and 4.

wow interesting, i wonder how much of that was due to the 2nd transplant? maybe the 1st one thickened up as well, or maybe it was spurred on my the 2nd one?! thanks for sharing the update.

doesn't look like much change since month 2 as expected, but i think you can expect to see nothing but growth for the next 5 months. doesn't sound too bad hey 🤩

bro hit us with the 3 month teaser and left, it probably looks amazing now 🤣

i'm keen to see an update too, should be about 3 months now where the growth starts to kick in

anyone know why the crown takes longer to grow in than the hairline?

@Gatsby your story is inspirational, way to go hanging in there. And it looks great, a worthy winner 👏

Imma let you finish but @Jamos1982 had one of the best transformations of ALL TIME

well, i don't mean directly eating what Pottengers cats did (if thats what you mean by raw meat and raw milk), but a more natural human diet i.e. no artificial sugar, no fast food, no processed food, only nutrient rich food suitable for humans. but our culture isn't wired in a way we can do this 100% of the time and requiring willpower for it is a resource depleted by other things. and mostly we're just born into a world with already degraded health because our parents and their parents were subject to stress and imperfect diets (and late pregnancies and whatever else can give us more health problems). i think this is one of these holes you can just keep peering into and theres no real answer. its a bit of a whatever. all we can do is try to enjoy our lives and try to make it better / not damage if further for future generations

thats interesting, but i think you could make an argument either way. maybe back then there were more acute stressors: wars, famine, diseases, less medical knowledge (also depending how far back you go). but maybe today there are more chronic stressors - toxins, radiation, pollution, less nutrient dense food

it would be more complex than a one-off situation for one person. we're talking general population with generational damage, have you heard of Pottenger's cats? but also combined with genetic susceptibility.

please take a better quality after photo. i suggest standing near an open door with outdoor light (but not direct light) and using the normal camera (not front facing on the phone)

neither of these hairlines look pluggy, so i think based on the criteria of 'do they look pluggy?' they are tolerable. which is of course subjective. i wonder why this happens. maybe when the graft was harvested it only had one hair inside it but it actually had just shed a hair so it was a 'secret multiple' 🤫

honestly i think back then times were a lot tougher. maybe it was survival of the fittest, the stronger genes were passed on. for a long time we've been weak and the weakness has been allowed to thrive and pass imperfect genes on. it seems in general we've got a lot more disease and illness too. possibly from more toxins and pollution etc - or you could argue that we're just better at diagnosing now. but then you could argue we're over medicated because of that. another argument is that we're having babies way too late in life - having babies in our 30's is known to be worse for their health, waaay more health problems and likelyhood of developmental issues, autism, etc. Back then they were pumping out kids in their teenage years or early 20s at most, when people were in peak health. Not sure about everyone else but now its an affordability issue to be able to have kids at all, let alone when you're 35. If you have them at 20 without rich parents you've basically signed a contract that you might be struggling for money most if not all of your life. when it comes down to it this is such a complex topic and no one knows why, its all conjecture

great transplant but that hair style is questionable 😂

Hi Romeo, why is she called "Dr Bonus"?

every day? i'd drive myself insane doing that. looks good at month 4!

agree with this. not sure what above image is showing? lets see pre-op and a week after the HT. it doesn't look super dense but it doesn't seem unnatural either.

Coming along very nicely now!

i've had less side effects on topical dutasteride than i had on oral finasteride, dose is important though

hairline design looks great

oh wow interesting, glad they took care of you. i wonder also if this is the only anesthetic they can use or if there aren't others? anyway best to prioritise your health and stay safe.

its a pointy hairline