Aftermath

Nothing against them, just haven't seen enough of their work and I'm not very familiar with their doctors, are they recommended on this site? Also looking at the site, the results look average... And that's obviously going to be their very best results

Won't go wrong with either of those! Personally I wouldn't go to HDC

Best value for money IMO is Koray Erdogan in Turkey IMO, I might have included Hakan Doganay a few weeks ago but the recent things that've come 2 light have left a bad taste in my mouth with regards Hakan! Lorenzo is great but charges accordingly, Bisanga and Feriduni are somewhere in the middle but both very good! Hope this helps

Thanks for the video, very informative! When I've had shock loss in the past in the donar, the areas without hair have been very pinky/red even though there was about half an inch of shock loss above/below the scar , the whole area was pinky/red even after 2months or so is that normal? Is it due to the quarterisation? The skin in the shock loss area in the vid looked normal colour

Dr Lorenzo seems to be a class act, I wouldn't hesitate to let him work on my scalp! What's happening post September though? I've heard he's going back to Spain, is the Farjo partnership ending?

This assessment sounds bang on, and tbh I wouldn't consider a HT without meds... Certainly not FUT

I'd get more options tbh mate, just make sure it's reputable doctors, send these pics for an online consultation with some on the top guys like Hasson and Wong, Konior, Rahal, feller (for FUT) or some of the Belgian (bisanga, feriduni) or Turkish docs (Erdogan, Doganay) for FUE etc and see what they say! I'm no expert but the only reason I'd say you'd be unsuitable is if your dead against propecia use, because tbh if you're not taking propecia u will lose the rest of your hair so a HT would only give a dense result temporarily! Your donor doesn't look to be thinning and if meds work for u, seems to me u could get a fairly good result

not a fan of rahal mate??

can you post some pics... front, back, sides and top so we can have a visual? maybe some1 on here can give further advice! agree u shouldn't have a HT without going on meds though!

Look forward to hearing your opinion

fairer comparison but same result

what are your views on this actual case? pre-op looks worlds apart from post op! I wasn't sure if it was pre op pics making the situation look worse, flattering post op pics (maybe topik) or just flat-out lies about graft numbers! The guy looks great post op, no doubting that but when compared to the pre-op and the fact under 1700 grafts were used, something just doesn't add up for me! although the actual poster seems like a genuine guy!

I'm not a fan of farjo either, far too conservative and can't/won't dense pack, but Lorenzo isn't farjo! Lorenzo is world class... Probably the best FUE surgeon in the world at the moment and also does all aspects of the op personally! Never heard of dr ball, and zeroing clinic is a chain so personally I wouldn't go there

Won't go wrong with Lorenzo! If you want FUE he'd be my first choice tbh

U should be mate it looks great! First time I've ever questioned a published result on this forum... Take it as a complement! Also if that's your first HT you have plenty left if there's future loss! Have 2 say I'm pretty jealous of your hair!!lol

Also I think you should make a thread of your own so people can see the results! Would be good publicity for the clinic IMO! Literally the best transformation with that amount of grafts I've ever seen!

I believe it's you mate, wasn't sure at first but it's pretty clear now! Thanks for taking the time to prove it! The only reason I questioned it is the difference pre to post doesn't seem possible with the small amount of grafts! As I asked before, do you feel medication has improved your overall hair condition?

Mate, u look great, it's a fantastic job... I just can't get my head around how the hell this can be 1700 grafts! Has the general condition of your hair improved with medication?

I'd ideally like to see that together with clearer close up post ops. Flattering lighting combined with blurry pics can paint a much different picture! Kinda feel like I'm being an asshole, it's just I have literally never seen such a transformation with under 1700 grafts... Ever!!

Only other thing if add... The post op pics have no hairline close ups in good lighting conditions, they're all a bit blurry with not great lighting... Some better quality post op pics would be much appreciated

Wait... The first of those 3 pics is pre op? I thought that was the 6.5 month pic? The hair in this pic looks so much better than the surgery a pre op pics! Why do the clinics pre op pics look so bad? Did your hair look that bad day to day or was it under a spotlight or something? Transformation looks little more realistic if that was a pre op pic! Great transformation to be fair!

And in the crown... Pretty much generalised all over thinning... From that to a completely full head of hair with no signs of hair loss at all in under 1700 grafts?! I just don't see how that's possible unless 1) more hairs transplanted than stated 2) false pre- op pics 3) use of topik in post op pics 4) extremely flattering lighting in post op pics 5) the greatest reaction ever to hair loss medication

Got them now although they aren't pre op pics, they're immediate post op! I'm not doubting you've had a HT mate, I was just looking for proof that u were the guy in the pre op, the post ops are shaved down so all I can tell is it's you in the results pics and that in fact you've had a HT.... Which I wasn't doubting! It's a great result whether it's you in the pre-op or not but tbh the pics you sent don't really show me much other than the fact you've had surgery, it neither proves not disproves it's u in the pre-op pics IMO! If it's all legit u must be thrilled with the results? I assume your not using any topik?

Haven't got any messages yet! Did u? I notice u also posted your email address

Nothing received in my inbox??