Jump to content

SLA

Senior Member
  • Posts

    1,400
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SLA

  1. Very good results here! 1st of all, he started as a NW 7 with pretty much no hair. 2nd, he is planning to do another surgery of 1,500 grafts which will fill out the top and crown. 3nd, he has not even tapped into FUE or beard hairs.

    All of these combined would likely give this person a full head of hair.

    Finally, fibers seem to be working already to create a full look!

  2. To me, if true,  3,000 grafts to me would be worth it. Other surgeons do not agree with the FUT/FUE combo yielding more grafts and they cite a ton of reasons (which may or may not be plausible)....but I divert. Would love to see a critical debate around Shapiro's lifetime graft availability study.

    I think it is good to think long term as we have limited donor resources and hair loss is progressive. Even at 47 with a virgin scalp, I could take the attitude that I am pushing 50 so an extra few grafts down the road will not matter much to me, however, I don't know how I will feel at age 70. Will I be satisfied with the results I got and not care so much about my hair or will I wish I had a few more grafts left in my donor to do another transplant? I am not sure of the answer, but it would be nice to know there are options due to decisions made now.

     

     

  3. On 2/14/2021 at 2:40 AM, forest said:

    So if in the future you reach nw 7 or 8 you would also need to cover the crown and back of the head too. Then you can't use beard hair there. You would have to use scalp hair but you already used up some precious scalp hair already. Is this something you discussed with the doc?
    I did not discuss this with the doctor explicitly. I also did not find any precedence for what you are suggesting.
    Perhaps other folks can help here @JohnAC71  @SLA

    As for beard hair in the crown, I think you can use, but not in the whorl of the crown. Watch from minute 4:10-4:40 in which Dr. Bansal talks specifically about where you can place beard hair on scalp.

    Hope this helps!

     

     

  4. On 2/13/2021 at 4:06 PM, RandoBrando517 said:

    From what I understood in the interview combining both gets you 3,000 grafts more on average. Am I missing something? Seems like you guys are talking strictly one or the other.

    I did hear that in the Shapiro interview that they said that you might be able to get 3,000 more grafts by combining. Sounds like a lot more in their opinion!

    • Like 1
  5. 11 hours ago, Melvin-Moderator said:

    I would probably do it in sections. Like the saying goes, a little of everything turns out to be nothing. Better to do the front and midscalp, then address the crown later with FUE and BHT.

    What Eugenix does so well is incorporating BHT from the get go in the midscalp which allows for more scalp hair to be used in the crown. My concern is that someone will get a couple of strips using scalp hair to cover the front and midscalp and only be left with a little scalp donor, so mostly BHT will be needed for the crown. 

    Might this look visibly awkward with predominantly BHT in the crown rather than better distributed throughout the midscalp and parts of crown?

  6. Thanks for posting @asterix0! I and many other wonder the same question, so you are definitely not alone.

    I have done some digging to try to answer this question. There definitely seems to be a mix in opinion even amongst reputable HT doctors and some like Cole and Bhatti even abandoned successful FUT practices to go the FUE route and claim that FUE yields more hair (even while staying in the safe zone) than FUT. I posted an article in the FUE forum written by John Cole titled "The Case For FUE". You can check it out to get his take on this topic.

    In a consultation with Arika Bansal from Eugenix, she said she feels that both methods yield the same number of grafts in a lifetime citing, needing more hair to hide a strip scar, being harder to extract below a strip scar in that their could be donor thinning; she even sent me a couple of photos to show donor thinning below a successful FUT scar.

    There are other points FUE doctors make to counter the FUT greater graft availability argument including follicles transecting in vivo which can be used again, telogen hairs not being thrown away with FUE, stretching of skin with FUT which can create more baldness around the crown,  change in hair direction with FUT making it difficult to extract using FUE post FUT. Some also claim the perpetuation this FUT myth of more lifetime grafts by surgeons in that FUT is much easier and less time consuming for the surgeon to perform.

    I reached out to Dr. Vories, a coalition doctor on this forum who feels that both methods yield the same and I had an email dialogue with Dr. Cole who said that he feels someone with advanced hair loss should not get FUT making the argument that FUT technicians artificially create more grafts with FUT which inflate the total number of grafts

    How much of this is truth and how much is marketing/pseudoscience, I do not know.

    I write this not to argue one position over another, but just to offer what I have learned. Truth or not I do not know :).

    At some point, I am others with this question will have to take a leap of faith in one direction of another.

    Hope this helps!

     

     

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...