harryforreal

With both Propecia (Finasteride) and Rogaine, you can stop anytime. You will loose all benefits of the medicine, but you can stop anytime (meaning your hair loss picks up where it left off before starting to use the meds). Perhaps the better thing is to get opinions from people who have had a transplant and did not take meds to see what their long term results are. I took finasteride for approximately 7 years (age 28 - 35) before a new doctor took me off of it because she saw no evidence of hair loss and thought it was absurd for me to take a drug for no "apparent" reason. By 37-38 I saw recession, but didn't think much of it. I thought it if progressed I could always get a hair transplant which didn't rely on drugs. HUGE MISTAKE. My hair loss continued to progress, and after a quick consultation with a recommend doctor on this forum, hair transplant it was - with quite horrid results. Now I have had a disgusting looking hair transplant, I am back on Finasteride and I'm using Rogaine to try and re-stimulate growth and cover up the disgusting result of this hair transplant. Barring some serious medical issue with either medicine, I don't see myself stopping them anytime soon. Maybe when I'm like 80 or some such number when it doesn't matter so much anymore. I really, however, am continually shocked at the attitude to dismiss medicines and go for an "all-natural" hair transplant - except I did the same thing, but only because of that stupid doctor - Doctor Patel in Jersey City, just for the record. F*@!$ cu*7. Merry Christmas!

I would also consider at least trying propecia first and see if you get the side effects. I strongly second this. There is nothing natural about a hair transplant; finasteride is far less intrusive to your body than a hair transplant; it's incredibly cheap; and you can always stop taking it and it leaves your system pretty quickly. 1 year of finasteride is maybe $60. I thought a transplant might be better than taking meds. But now I wish I had tried the meds first. Your recession is fairly advanced, so I wouldn't expect meds to restore all your hair. But I would tend to think at 32 without meds a hair transplant is going to leave you looking worse in a few years than your current hair status. Check out Bernstein's study. https://www.bernsteinmedical.com/medical-treatment/patient-photos/

The doctor's office had suggested 3 treatments originally, but after the first V-Beam treatment the area was significantly less red. I had a second treatment and that all but eliminated it. Haven't had a third treatment yet. Each treatment has been a little over $200. It is not an ongoing thing for traumatized skin; however, people who have rosacea may have multiple treatments throughout their life - but that is not what you're talking about. My redness was at the front of my hairline where hairs were transplanted into. I had FUE, so I can't comment on a FUT strip scar. Even so, I don't think the age matters. The redness is a result (as it was explained to me) of traumatized blood vessels near the skin due to surgery. The V-Beam targets the red color in the blood cells, and kind of vaporizes the...I think...capilaries carrying the blood cells. At least that's my non-medical take on it without looking it up. But you can look it up for more info. But it's commonly used for port wine birthmarks, rosacea, surgical redness; so the age I don't think will matter. Just make sure it's the V-Beam laser and not another laser that removes hair!

Nice outcome, Dr. Bloxham. FUT?

V-Beam laser for redness without affecting hair follicles. I've had 2 V-Beam treatments for redness in the recipient area, and it has helped significantly.

Very nice work, Dr. Feriduni. Would like to see both sides of the hairline with the hair raised. The skin in photo 9 is very good. Just no evidence of trauma. Really impressive. Parallel incisions (single, double and triple units) were made in custom-sized blades technique (~Cutting Edge blades of 0.75mm – 0.85mm) Dr. Feriduni, do you feel that blades are less traumatic to the skin than implanter pens? Or that blades produce better aesthetic results?

In the USA I do like Dr. Konior's work. And I have had contact with Dr. Feriduni, so I like his work as well. I will say that many of Feriduni's best results involve a strong forelock or such. If you can transplant hairs behind some soft, native hairs it will look better. An entire lowering of the hairline all the way across, however, is always more challenging for the reason that I've mentioned about moving coarser hairs from the back to the front. But there are some good results here from what you've listed. Ok...So, link by link critique. Objective, yet as critical as I can be simply for the purpose of holding these outcomes to the absolute highest standard - which is no small feat, and the doctors are to be commended on their work. Please don't misunderstand me. But I remind everyone that up close and in person is a whole other level above even the best photography. 1688 Graft Female Hairline Restoration - Hair Loss Surgery - Before and After Gallery: this is a good outcome. But also notice no hair is placed in front of/below the strong forelock. This strong, central forelock aids in giving a natural look to the entire hairline. But the temples look very good, as well. But again, notice there are quite a few soft, native hairs at the front of the temples on the sides (in the original purple rectangles on either side of the forelock). So this is not really a complete hairline lowering, but a filling in of the temples between a strong forelock in the center and soft, native hairs on the sides coming up from the ears. But an excellent outcome nonetheless, yes. One question worth asking is how do the transplanted hairs feel to the touch? Yes, I ask this because I constantly reach up and touch my transplanted hairs and notice the coarser feel in contrast to the softer feel on my sides above my ears. Something for consideration for someone thinking of a hair transplant. Also the post op hair appears to be a different color from the pre-op hair; I mean, as if it has been colored. If so, the coloring is going to contribute to a uniformity of color amongst native and transplanted hairs at the front. Just an observation. But again, an excellent outcome. Skin looks very nice, not beat up; MAYBE a slight pinkish hue at the temples. But again, I'm being as critical as I can be so others can think of things to consider when thinking about a hair transplant. 2141 Grafts by Dr. Konior - Hair Loss Surgery - Before and After Gallery: This one the hairline lowering occurs directly in the center front. Several things to consider. The patient appears to be Asian, and both the skin tone and hair color are darker, with presumably thicker, coarser hair. I've heard it said that darker skin tones recover from redness much quicker/better than lighter skin tones. That being said, the hairs at the front of the hairline in the pre-op photo are not black, but actually brown (or appear that way to me). But after the transplant, the newly transplanted hairs in the center are definitely thicker and blacker. As long as the patient is ok with this darker hair color, then that seems fine to me. For me this was quite the shock in my hair transplant, and is a great disappointment - I love the golden highlights on the native hairs on the sides of my temples above my ears and miss them across the front of my hair line. I assumed that transplanted hairs across the front of my hairline would be similarly golden toned and soft. I had no idea that my hair color would actually end up being darker across the front of my head; and even my dad asked (whom I didn't tell), "Are you getting darker across the front of your head?" My response was, "Yes, and grayer also." Perhaps it's not so noticeable in Asian hair, but in my hairline it just looks weird having this dark, thin band across the front of my hairline. In this patient's "Postop Part Density" photo it appears this difference in hair characteristic is most noticeable - but admittedly only when held up to the highest scrutiny. As seems typical for Konior, an excellent result. Hairline Feminization by Dr. Konior - Hair Loss Surgery - Before and After Gallery Ehhh.....this one I'm not so crazy about. I've looked at this one before (several years ago). The main issue for me here is the coarseness of the transplanted hair to the front of the hairline. This is most readily apparent in the photo labeled, "Postop Transplant Density Inspection". You can clearly see where the transplanted hairs end, and the native hairs begin just based on the difference in coarse and softer native hairs. This picture is long enough after the transplant for the patient to grow hair long, so presumably long enough for the hair follicle to "recover". Also the redness on the skin is certainly still visible. Do you think this is 2 years worth of hair growth? No, I don't like it. I've used a straightening iron to "soften" the coarseness of my transplanted hairs when I've wanted to get dress up or go out. I can tell you, though, when you're swimming in the Mediterranean sea and climbing onto a boat, there's no option for a straightening iron. In the "Postop Temple View" and "Temple View Close-Up" the hair looks very wooly and coarse - same problem I've had, though this patient's transplant is more extensive than mine. Density and technique look good, but I would say skin tone and hair characteristics not a very good match for the procedure. 2161 Graft Female Hairline Restoration - Hair Loss Surgery - Before and After Gallery Another darker haired, darker skinned patient with an excellent outcome by Dr. Konior. | Blog Archive » | Blog Archive »: Although I respect the Shapiro team, these photos are not high definition, and I don't feel I can comment on the patients' outcomes with the same critical eye I have given Dr. Konior's work. http://hairtransplantation.feriduni....uction-2044-fu: Another darker skinned, coarser hair patient. In the bottom photo it's clear the transplanted hairs are thicker and coarser. Overall looks to be a nice job, though some better photos of the hairline and skin would make it easier to provide a more accurate assessment. http://hairtransplantation.feriduni....uction-1982-fu Classic feriduni. Strong forelock remains intact and in front of entire transplant, providing a soft and real, natural front to the hairline. It is interesting to note that the patient's hair is styled differently in the after photos - looks like maybe a sheen applied, and some coloring, and hair straightening; thus, the natural texture of all hairs, transplanted and native, is going to masked. I say again based on personal experience, a $50.00 straightening iron is very helpful in "taming" the coarseness. It doesn't make the transplanted hairs soft and whispy, but it does tame some of the coarse wildness. But the skin tone looks excellent - no redness, no bumps. Patient's skin looks a little bit darker - Spanish? Anyway, this clinic is known for top quality work, and having received an online quote personally, I can say the price reflects that. One question, though, in the bottom photo, does it seem that an effect has been added around the photos edges? Like a kind of soft, blurring that is common in photo editing? What's with the grey mist floating into the hair? Is it on the other photos as well? A great technique when having your photo taken at prom; not so sure about for hair transplant work. But I like Feriduni's work. https://vimeopro.com/user23345553/lu...video/86347848 Yeah, not so crazy about it. Look at around the 1:02 mark. Look at the bumpy quality where each graft exits the skin. I wonder if this is an effect of implanter pens. Implanter pens were used on my head, and I had a lot of the same. But also double grafts will contribute to that look. At 1:27 you can see clearly the difference in the size of the hair where the transplant ends and the native hairs begin. The whole thing looks off. This is a lighter skinned caucasian. And knowing this clinic, this was not a cheap procedure. Fail. Surgically the hairs grew. Aesthetically: Fail. Yeah, I know, I'm speaking blasphemy against the high god of hair transplant. Eh, I'm already Hell bound, so what's one more sin? https://vimeopro.com/user23345553/lu...ideo/122408519 Eh....same thing. @ 0:42 freeze the frame and you see the same effect - though it's a little blurrier. Video quality is not the greatest. Also the skin is definitely pink where the transplanted hairs were placed. Pinko's be wary. https://vimeopro.com/user23345553/lu...video/81667156 Again, poorer video quality. Pre-high definition? Hard to say as a result. Looks a bit better. But look at 0:47 freeze frame. Isn't the first inch or so of transplanted hairs darker (the hairs laying down, not the ones being held up)? It's rather hard to tell because the video quality just isn't there. Also the skin is a little pink...or something...maybe? Hard to tell so well because of the video quality. Oh...wait. Freeze frame 2:08. Yeah, you can definitely see a good inch into the hair along the part the hair suddenly becomes lighter and finer. But it's hard to tell, especially with this video quality. It will be interesting to see now that photo and video quality is becoming so incredibly good how well these clinics hold up under the most intense visual scrutiny. But overall it looks good. Not amazing. But good. But that was a lot of area to fill in. https://vimeopro.com/user23345553/lu...video/81563411 Again, not the best video quality. What's with the wet hair in the after photos? Well, anyway, it's ok. I see some pink skin, some bumpy texture around 1:22. Yeah, it's ok. Not beautiful. Ok. So there you have it. A play by play commentary. Again, Given that you're moving individual hair follicles from one part of the head to another, it's impressive. Whether it passes the "soft and natural" test is another. I like Dr. Konior's work, and Feriduni's. One thing that seems common is that lighter skin tones still have a pinkish hue 1-2 years after the transplant. Alright, sleepy... checking out now. And remember, I was being the utmost critical I could be, relentlessly so. I am not saying this is bad work. In fact, I've said just the opposite. However, there really are limits to what can be done, I think.

Overall a very impressive improvement. Yes, some added density I think would further improve the result nicely.

Yeaaaaaaaa.....60's/70's glam is coming down the runway yet AGAIN....betta git you sum! Roberto Cavalli 2017 Spring/Summer Men's Collection Lookbook Well if you haven't started the Finasteride, allow me to share my favorite hair loss link on medical treatment alone. Generic finasteride costs me less than $5.00 per month. Totally worth it. https://www.bernsteinmedical.com/medical-treatment/patient-photos/

Derail, or express a dissenting view? You might be right, but I don't think being the voice of skepticism is necessarily bad when expressed in a rational manner. Socratic dialogue is good for the soul! That is good to hear; and it is also why I don't say hair transplants are BAD!!! It's quite evident to me that for some people it's a life changer for the better, and I want to be respectful of that. But I also want to make sure - indeed, I feel morally obligated - to insure people understand not only the risks but also what the outcome is likely to look like AT IT'S BEST. And this I feel is not always accurately portrayed. But that is my feeling, and given your poor experience at Bosley I'm inclined to believe you might agree somewhat with this statement. Hmmm, I'm not really sure that's fair to the doctor. The hair has grown. Aesthetically it's not what I had hoped for - the bumpy texture and persisting redness aside. I do wish I had been counseled more about what the final outcome was likely to look like. I'm bothered that it was the surgeon's suggestion that I lower my hairline. I'm also bothered that I didn't try medication first - especially after looking at Dr. Bernstein's documentation on medication alone. I just looked at some of my before pictures taken by the clinic, and really, except for some thinning in the hairline that >>maybe<< might have had improvement with meds, I think the hairline looks rather nice - at least it looks soft and natural. I just had too much extra money to shoot for "perfection" at the time. Wish I had gone back on meds. Yeah, it's a regret I live with DAILY - myself and others who've been disappointed by their results. But such is life. As for the clinic, the doctor is a recommended doctor on here. Maybe he thought I would walk away happy with the outcome and recommended what he thought was best. I certainly hope so and prefer to give him such consideration. After all, by now it should be apparent my standards were, and remain, pretty high - perhaps unrealistically so. So I think it perhaps unfair to cast public doubt on a clinic that successfully transplanted hair on my head, even if the aesthetic outcome is less than stellar. But it was a first pass. For me to have a better opinion, I would need to see more high definition examples of stellar outcomes with a first pass. And then I would need the freedom to be critical - just to be contrary But my photos are real with no editing, high definition with a clear view of the skin - not just a photo from above the head that is only useful to a bird looking for a target to bomb. Emma can decide if the aesthetic result is within her range of acceptability. But, Emma, you're beautiful - go out and hit some club with some friends and find some cutey to flirt with ^^

Yes, I think you are correct in your assessment of what I am saying. And I think it's quite ok to disagree; and ultimately I hope I am wrong and you are correct in terms of achieving an aesthetically pleasing outcome. But I really haven't seen enough evidence thus far to have a different opinion - and I've been on this site since May 2013 as an official "member", and longer than that as a "lurker". But I also think my expectations and hopes were quite different from many who might have had a more informed perspective. Or maybe not. In any event, I can say for sure that I went into my first hair transplant with very little research, one consultation, and a general positive impression of hair transplant outcomes from the popular media - whether we're talking Dr. Oz or TMZ. And I'm not the only one that has done this. And, honestly, when I look at Emma (and not to be patronizing Emma!), I see the beauty of youth. 21 is just too young to risk such an operation for the reasons cited - in my opinion. In Emma's view, of course, she's prepared to have surgery to achieve a more pleasing personal aesthetic and that is reason enough. My goal is simply to share with Emma that in my opinion it is not possible to get the soft hairline one associates with the hair of a 21 year old. If Emma looks at various examples and decides that the results of others are within her realm of expectation and that she wants to go through with it, then that's fine. I just wish to present another viewpoint than what others here so enthusiastically jumped to. With that said, I'll rephrase what I asked earlier: How does one get thicker, darker hairs from the back of the head to look soft and natural and to match other soft and natural hairs at the front of the hairline? And if it is possible, what is the success rate on a first pass, as many of the transplanted best hairlines I see on this forum are actually the result of several passes. For a man in his 30's or 40's, maybe a man with a supportive girlfriend or wife (or the reverse a woman with a supportive boyfriend or husband), a 3 year time span might be well within an acceptable time frame. But for a 21 year old in the prime of their social life - FINALLY LEGALLY ABLE TO DRINK PUBLICLY!!! - having a surgical procedure that might very well shut down one's social life for several years is just wrong in my opinion. There are plenty of slender, striking models on the runway with high hairlines. Check out the soft, feather hairs of the girl in the large picture. You can't duplicate that with a hair transplant - at least I don't think: http://special-hairstyles.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/crimped-hairstyles-for-2016.jpg For that matter, check out the hairline of this male model: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/14425661280263924/ I wish it were possible. I just don't think it is - but hopefully someone will prove me wrong!

That is a big change and overall improvement.

Hey, Tewodrinho, I know you're using Rogaine, but are you taking Finasteride? That may solve your density on top. As for your hair line, I think it looks great. Throw you into some bell bottoms and a corduroy jacket and you can be my wingman anytime!

Not to trivialize your concerns, Emma, but I think many of the men on THIS website - which is focused on hairloss, not hairstyling - would pay a handsome sum to be able to wear their hair in "only" 3 different hairstyles. And this is exactly what I speaking of when I wrote to KO, Emma's post of 8:36 PM (GMT, by the way, in case you're wondering about the time difference) appeared immediately after my 8:35 post by only a second or two, so I'm not sure Emma saw my 8:35 post, and I certainly didn't see her 8:36 post. But there is a difference between the hair styling concerns of a 21 year old versus the hair replacement concerns of a 50 year old. To this end, Emma, I ask, did you look at the 2 photos I included of my hairline that I posted on your thread? Is the result something you would find aesthetically pleasing? Many men on this forum would be happy with such a result - I say this because I look at their results about which they are delighted and I think, "WHAAAT?!?!?" But for people looking for a cosmetic/aesthetic enhancement rather than hair replacement, I'm not sure a hair transplant is the solution. For me the common mantra on these forums to "add more density" doesn't really solve the crux of the problem: How does one get thicker, darker hairs from the back of the head to look soft and natural and to match other soft and natural hairs at the front of the hairline? I don't believe it is possible. I've been trying to figure out a way for 5 years, posed the question many times, have yet to get a satisfactory answer. And now I'm looking to have electrolysis remove many of these darker, thick weird hairs at the front. Of course I'm not sure how well it will work, what the skin will look like afterwards, etc. So I'll start with 3 hairs is the plan, and go from there. But man, what an embarrassment this summer when the 25 year old Swede looked at my hairline and touched it and asked, "Are you going bald?" Recession is one thing; a high hairline another. But, quite frankly, scraggly looking pubic-like hairs that look like balding hairs at the front of the hairline. Uggggh.... At least this happened when I was in my 40's. I can't imagine if I had done this when I was 21, in the prime of my youth, how it would have affected me.

I don't really understand this statement, though. The risks are the same to me: if the results look unnatural or bad, or if there is a large scar in the back of the head from FUT, or patchiness in the back from FUE, the risks are all the same. I mean, my hair is shoulder length long. I'm not sure what the difference is when you say women with a high hair line. Do you mean since they have long hair in the back? My dissatisfaction with my procedure is all about the hairline in the front. There are many men with significant hair loss who have expressed satisfaction with their hair transplant. So for that reason alone I am unwilling to say no one should have one, because for those persons who have had significant hair loss and they are happy with the results I think that's great. But honestly, as a person whose hair loss was minimal over the years, my expectations were quite different - and certainly not based on any real research: my fault for sure. I had the impression after consulting with the hair doctor that it wouldn't be a big deal. FUE was easy and I would end up with a thick, low, natural looking hairline. The FUE was "relatively" easy. But compared to the soft hairline I had before "lowering" it, the result is by no means soft and natural. It just doesn't meet expectations. I'm not talking density. I'm talking the softness and lightness of the hair. Natural hair that used to blow gently across my face in a slight breeze, now that is fronted by darker, thicker, hair that doesn't fall about my face so softly. And also the redness and the bumpy texture that resulted as well! I just don't think a young female with such soft hair - and, yes, a high hairline - realizes what she is about to risk here. The hair of a 50 year old Norwood 5 bald man is significantly more coarse than the soft, vellum hairs on a 21 year old female hairline. For a 50 year old gray haired Norwood 5 to have a hair transplant and walk away 1 year later with scraggly hair on top is very different than a 21 year old with soft, light hair wanting a Hollywood/Supermodel hairline that looks great from every photo angle. I think persons with darker, coarser hair have better results. I also think people who have had significant hair loss for decades are grateful when they get some coverage as long as it looks decent. But...I'm thinking fashion model hair not 50 year old men. The soft look of youth. Of course Emma must decide for herself. But sometimes I wonder if discussion about hair transplants are skewed because the bulk of people talking about them are older persons with different hair expectations. To be clear, KO, I have read many of your posts, and I respect what you write. So this is nothing personal. But I'm not talking coverage or hair replacement here. More...hair styling. For me, the transplant has equated to the worst hairstyle I have ever had without really adding anything. "Frame the face" some say. Bah. This summer I was in the Mediterranean with a beautiful 25 year old Swede - tall, thin, long blonde hair, blue eyes. I look at some photos of us after swimming in the sea, and oh, man. My hair. Talk about freakish looking where the transplant is. By midway through the summer I had plucked the transplanted hairs out because it just looked so bad. Yes, I was left with a higher hairline, but at least it looked softer and more natural.

0303, I believe Dr. Cooley abandoned the Artas FUE - though I'm not sure about that. He sure wasn't crazy about it when I visited with him.

With all due respect to KO, are you speaking FUT versus FUE? I should have been more clear: In my opinion Emma needs neither. Emma, I understand your desire to change something about your physical appearance. Who doesn't want to change this or that to match some ideal we've seen in a Hollywood film or such? And if it were really that easy to change, I might be more comfortable with it. However, I can say from personal experience it ain't as easy as some would have you believe. Does my hairline look natural or soft to you? Look at the hair on the side of my head for comparison, because that is what I was used to seeing at the top of my head before the hair doctor suggested lowering my hairline (his suggestion, not mine). The thought of having a "Brad Pitt" hairline was appealing. I had the money, so I went for it. Hahahahaha..... Yeah, I used to brush my hair back because I had beautiful waves in my hair. Now I always brush it forward to cover up this mess at the front of my hairline. That's all that matters, don't go messing it up then. So some angles are less flattering in photos then others. Just because you lower the hairline doesn't mean it's going to look perfect from all angles either! There are some aesthetic procedures that produce excellent results with minimal risk (though nothing is risk free). A hair transplant, in my opinion, certainly isn't one of them - however, that was not something I understood before I had mine. I did no research whatsoever because everything you see on TV and in magazines about botox, breast implants, hair transplants,etc. made it all seem so easy. Botox is easy and great. Done it many times. Laser treatments for freckles and such also easy and great. Done it meany times. Also micro-needling, easy and great. Hair transplant? NO. Not easy at all, with very questionable results in my opinion. Even the best photos still show the flaws. You are only 21. You could be engaging in a procedure that is going to scar you for life. I had my transplant when I was 42. And prior to that I had some really fun times - partied all over Europe, from London to Ibiza to Berlin for years. The results of my Hair transplant, however, significantly affected that, starting with 2 full years of staying in every night while trying to get improvement. You're concerned about how you look in a photo with a natural hairline. If you are dissatisfied with the result - and reading this forum should give you plenty enough reason to suspect that you very well might be - how your hair looks in a photo from a particular angle will be the least of your concerns. The beauty of youth is just that: youth. When you get older, you can worry about how to best hide the inevitable aging process without risking the loss of your youth to some misguided "easy" cosmetic procedure. I looked at your photos, you're a beautiful young girl. To risk your youthful beauty on "lowering" your hairline is too great a risk in my opinion. At the very least, wait awhile. Continue reading these forums and looking at real photos posted by people rather than some doctor's office seeking clients. And remember, high hairlines are just as beautiful as lower hairlines, despite what some may have you believe. http://www.listal.com/list/female-celebrities-high-foreheads

OMG. I would NOT recommend lowering the hairline for you. You are a very beautiful, young lady, with lovely hair and a lovely hairline. It may be "high" in some people's opinions, but there are others who would find it "perfect". And FUT?! You REALLY should consider the scarring to your hairline, not to mention the back of your head from FUT. I really can't recommend enough that you NOT do this. Just for you I am uploading 2 photos of my hairline taken yesterday, almost 5 years after a doctor suggested I lower my hairline. Ugh...

The clinical studies show very few people have side effects. Again, look at Bernstein's clinical photo results and make the decision as to whether you should take it. I had a female doctor take me off finasterdie, and then my hair receded. Quite possibly the worst mistake of my life was to stop with the finasteride. https://www.bernsteinmedical.com/medical-treatment/patient-photos/

And I've said many times consider Dr. Bernstein's advice to always try medication first for a full year before undergoing irreversible surgery. Finasteride is dirt cheap: less than $5.00 per month. https://www.bernsteinmedical.com/medical-treatment/patient-photos/

Glad to see you are happy with the results!

In contrast, how often are people told wait a few more months before passing judgement? I waited a total of 18 months before I passed my final judgement: surgical success, aesthetic failure.

I think this message needs to be shared much more extensively. Thank you for your honesty and sincerity, Dr. Bernstein.

I like Dr. Konior's hairlines. And I'm pretty down on the whole H.T. industry. I would love to see more, higher definition photos - particularly of the skin and hairline. But overall it looks very good to me based on the few pics I've seen, and I would not recommend at this point to do another.

I honestly wonder if there are people in this industry who push anti-finasteride fear in order to continue profiting from hair loss. Clinically there is no reason to not try finasteride - at least from what I've seen. I've posted Dr. Bernstein's study several times, and I can't see how one would not try it given the overall safety record of the very cheap but highly effective drug. When looking at all the comparative photos of poor hair transplants and the subsequent emotional psychological fallout, how can one consider a hair transplant before meds? https://www.bernsteinmedical.com/medical-treatment/patient-photos/nggallery/page/1