GNX1

im not so sure being recommended or not is the end all be all cause there are some great doctors out there that arent being recommended for whatever reasons and there are some that are even recommended here that I would not let touch my head with a 10 foot pole..... what kind of body hair do you have and what does ur beard hair look like? if he is not skilled enough or experienced enough to entertain beard or body hair there are plenty of doctors in India that can help you.

wat the hell is a conselor?:confused:

if one has enough donor body hair they could essentially replace the grafts taken from the donor zone on the back with body hair grafts. it would obviously be twice the work but considering there are quality FUE clinics around the world that charge $1-3 per grafts vs. $8-12 per grafts it certainly is possible. that would therefore leave no scar. I dont think that is what he is going to introduce but I would disagree that anytime a graft is removed via FUE it will leave a scar on the head cause if it is filled with a graft from the body no scar will result. plenty of people have body hair that is nearly as thick as their head hair. im sure there would technically be a scar from the area where the body hair was removed cause ur not filling that graft hole but so what and hairs taken from the body (chest, stomach, legs) leave a much less visible scar then on the head. in fact, id say it essentially scarless to the naked eye.

wow! went from being essentially bald to a full head of hair. just goes to show large FUE sessions are not only possible but proven to work. and thats with no beard or body hair. what does he charge per head graft?

international no. in the US yes.

no problem. and no it wont be easy to find a legit source so be skeptical cause after taking it u wont see the WOW effect that u might see with d-bol or something very strong. its primarily used for strength and fat loss in the belly (visceral fat) but the fat loss in that area tends to be permanent but takes some time. there is certainly more then one company that makes it so be careful. half like is 4 hours. a moderate dose taken in the morning is largely out of the system by night yet gives reasonable levels of androgen during the day and early evening. take in morming and b4 u go to bed. var shares the liver toxicity problems common to all 17-alkylated steroids. 40 mg-day and higher, liver toxicity is indeed an issue with prolonged use but u dont need that much to be honest. 20-30mg shud suffice.

by itself no I dont. it doesnt convert enough but if one is already losing their hair they will continue to lose their hair likely to some degree no matter what you take so some who have takn var (anavar) have reported hair loss but thats because they were losing it anyway. it is the safest and most sought after steroid on the planet which is why its conterfieted so often and why women often take it. deca durabolin is the next safest along with primobolan imo but never ever take 5ar blockers such as proscar or propecia cause it would block the conversion of nandrolone to DHN in tissues such as the scalp and the prostate resulting in hairloss and BPH:eek:. if one takes testosterone along with a 5ar blocker such as proscar it's not nearly as harmful for your hair. DHT is an anti-estrogen and blocking it while your body has higher levels of testosterone might lead to gynecomastia so id combine proscar with Arimidex for example. test will convert to DHT via 5ar enzyme. that's the main reason why test is so androgenic tho. I hav never known anyone to take var and accelerate their hair loss but its so hard to tell or calculate cause they may have been losing it rapidly anyway so many see a nexus but there is no THEORY like some have stated. the science does not support hair loss due to its lack of conversion.

Dr. Madhu or Dr. Radha have limited experience with FUE so I would not recommend them for FUE. they seem to perform more FUT but thats not what ur interested in. A or Bhatti would be my choice between those discussed here.

it lacks the capacity to interact with the 5-alpha reductase enzyme and convert to dihydro form. its RARELY used by itself but has been around since the 60's but usually used with a test or anadrol. it is sought after by women bodybuilders as well for its characteristics and safety but it is also one of the most conterfeited steroids on the black market.

wrong! Anavar does not aromatize or convert to DHT which is why it is considered one of the safest and most sought after oral steroids. oxandrolone is a DHT derivative, meaning, it is already alpha-5 Reduced. It cannot convert back to DHT once it has been metabolized. nor will it cause gynecomastia.

a discussion yes I agree. u were not making it a discussion. u were saying it as tho it is fact as being a disadvantage. a fact that is not supported by any evidence so ur comments are misleading to those who dont know better. most everything Mickey stated is true and possible and I agree with. what you stated has not been substantiated by anyone and since its been around for a decade now we would have surely heard of this complaint or issue by now since there has been thousands of FUE patients from all over the world. its not happening nor is anyone complaining that its happening so again ur comments are not supported by evidence other then some HT doctor trying to speculate and turn ppl away from FUE cause he or she doesnt perform FUE on a regular basis which means its simply conjecture and nothing else. no one is being defensive when u make claims that have ZERO evidence to support them. there just calling them BS thats all. just like claims were made at one time by FUT doctors that BHT would not take in the head and would not grow any longer then they would where they were taken from. that has been proven to be BS cause the body hairs grow much longer in the scalp then they do from the chest or legs or wherever they were takn from. which coalition doctor was it and do they have a great deal of experience with FUE?

a discussion yes I agree. u were not making it a discussion. u were saying it as tho it is fact as being a disadvantage. a fact that is not supported by any evidence so ur comments are misleading to those who dont know better. most everything Mickey stated is true and possible and I agree with. what you stated has not been substantiated by anyone and since its been around for a decade now we would have surely heard of this complaint or issue by now since there has been thousands of FUE patients from all over the world. its not happening nor is anyone complaining that its happening so again ur comments are not supported by evidence other then some HT doctor trying to speculate and turn ppl away from FUE cause he or she doesnt perform FUE on a regular basis which means its simply conjecture and nothing else. no one is being defensive when u make claims that have ZERO evidence to support them. there just calling them BS thats all. just like claims were made at one time by FUT doctors that BHT would not take in the head and would not grow any longer then they would where they were taken from. that has been proven to be BS cause the body hairs grow much longer in the scalp then they do from the chest or legs or wherever they were takn from. which coalition doctor was it and do they have a great deal of experience with FUE?

thick n wavy hair sure can giv the illusion of more hair. looks great

yea u look great bro. most of us would be happier then a pig in chit to look as good as u do right now. worst case scenereo you go back in a couple years for a couple hundred grafts but thats a big maybe since u have such great hair to begin with.

I think the density could have been a little better but all in all it looks great and once it grows out I dont think ull be anything but happy and u have plenty of donor hair so worst case scenereo you go to someone here in the good ole US of A and get a few more grafts if thats what u want. once it grows out I dont think ull be feeling that way. looking at it shaved vs. grown will have an entirely different look considering you grow it so long.

yea, I see what ur sayn after lookn at it again but its only 2 months out so too soon to really say or really mean anything at this stage. very impressed with the beard graft removal healing. I dont see any signs that grafts were takn from the beard.

the near crown area always grows slower. less blood supply goin there is the general concensus.

If FUE was brand new I could see someone making that claim as a possibility but its been around for quite some time now with thousands of patients from around the world and none of them are complaining that because they received FUE their hairs are now falling out and minaturizing. if that was so we would have surely heard about it by now. there is simply no evidence to support that claim. in theory anyone can say anything but until there are patients complaining of such then its just speculation.

If FUE was brand new I could see someone making that claim as a possibility but its been around for quite some time now with thousands of patients from around the world and none of them are complaining that because they received FUE their hairs are now falling out and minaturizing. if that was so we would have surely heard about it by now. there is simply no evidence to support that claim. in theory anyone can say anything but until there are patients complaining of such then its just speculation.

obviously u got offended when I refuted what many ppl think and that is you dont need to risk a poorly healing scar on the back of ones head if you need a large number of grafts these days. show me where I bashed anyone? I simply pointed out things I have observed over the last 15 years since I started researching hair transplants. anytime a doctor starts thinking out of the box or is doing something other HT doctors cant or simply wont ppl start questioning the validity of their work and think it must be a fluke that an FUE doctor can pretty much completely restore someones look with no visible scaring when cutting their hair down to a #1. see ur making ASSumptions based on what I said. ur ASSumptions are false. ur entitled to ur opinion just like everyone on this forum is. Dr. Umar has proven it time and time again large sessions can be completed with FUE. I can see that gets you upset cause u had FUT over FUE but you act like it was directed towards you. I hear time and time again if your a NW5, 6 or 7 FUE wont cut it and ull be forced to roll the dice on FUT and the chance that it may leave u disfigured reguiring you to THEN seek out an FUE doctor to repair the poorly healed scar by placing grafts in the stretched and disfigured scar. ive seen hundreds, if not thousands of patients thruout the yrs. on this forum and many others to verify that. its a fact and others shud be aware of it. if that offends you sorry. and yes I dont feel FUT is the gold standard by any stretch of anyones imagination when it leaves so many patients feeling they wish they never had a HT or now have to seek out another HT doctor to repair them. it may have been the only option for many ppl for many years but competition has driven down the price of FUE so imo I consider FUE to be the current gold standard. others will disagree but again they are entitled to their opinion.

show me the patients that are complaining about their grafts falling out or thinning due to FUE. otherwise you know wat they say about opinions....:rolleyes: actual hair doctors tell me. thats like saying "I hear this is true". lets see the evidence.

show me the patients that are complaining about their grafts falling out or thinning due to FUE. otherwise you know wat they say about opinions....:rolleyes: actual hair doctors tell me. thats like saying "I hear this is true". lets see the evidence.

thats quite an ASSUMPTION ur makn there. and considering beard and body hairs are no where near any area that is subject to DHT id say ur wrong. FUE doctors can take all the grafts they will need from the safe area (either head or body) and have been for the last 10 years or so now so again ur assumption that grafts will be extracted from an area they should not be extracting from is like saying "If FUT doctors took a strip from an area thats outside the safe zone the grafts would eventually be subject to the effects of DHT". thats quite obvious isnt it? and not to mention the "Safe zone" for FUE is wherever the doctor wants to remove the grafts from vs. strip where they have to be taken from one particular area so if that particular area is subject to DHT (like you stated) then based on ur theory or the theory that was explained to you then all the hairs in that area would eventually fall out. thats just not happening. it sounds more like an FUT doctor tryn to cast doubt on a technique that he is either not comfortable, has little experience with or doesnt want to perform because FUT is more profitable to him. lets face it there are quite a few doctors that have been performing FUE for nearly a decade now and if what you are saying was so their patients would be posting their complaints. I have yet to see any FUE patients complain that their newly transplanted grafts are now falling out. I doctor can theorize anything he wants but unless there are numerous cases to back up his opinion id say he's just blowing smoke....:rolleyes:

thats quite an ASSUMPTION ur makn there. and considering beard and body hairs are no where near any area that is subject to DHT id say ur wrong. FUE doctors can take all the grafts they will need from the safe area (either head or body) and have been for the last 10 years or so now so again ur assumption that grafts will be extracted from an area they should not be extracting from is like saying "If FUT doctors took a strip from an area thats outside the safe zone the grafts would eventually be subject to the effects of DHT". thats quite obvious isnt it? and not to mention the "Safe zone" for FUE is wherever the doctor wants to remove the grafts from vs. strip where they have to be taken from one particular area so if that particular area is subject to DHT (like you stated) then based on ur theory or the theory that was explained to you then all the hairs in that area would eventually fall out. thats just not happening. it sounds more like an FUT doctor tryn to cast doubt on a technique that he is either not comfortable, has little experience with or doesnt want to perform because FUT is more profitable to him. lets face it there are quite a few doctors that have been performing FUE for nearly a decade now and if what you are saying was so their patients would be posting their complaints. I have yet to see any FUE patients complain that their newly transplanted grafts are now falling out. I doctor can theorize anything he wants but unless there are numerous cases to back up his opinion id say he's just blowing smoke....:rolleyes:

if u take grafts from an area that is not resistent to DHT it will make no difference if they are from FUT or FUE so what exactly is ur point? are you implying that those who have had FUE have grafts that are likely to fall out sooner then if they were taken via FUT?