Senior Member Dr. Herbert Feinberg Posted August 29, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted August 29, 2013 26 year old man Norwood 3 Vertex One Robotic transplant seesion 1,400 FUs 2,800 hairs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Blake Bloxham Posted August 29, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted August 29, 2013 Subtle and natural! Nice work. "Doc" Blake Bloxham - formerly "Future_HT_Doc" Forum Co-Moderator and Editorial Assistant for the Hair Transplant Network, the Hair Loss Learning Center, the Hair Loss Q&A Blog, and the Hair Restoration Forum All opinions are my own and my advice does not constitute as medical advice. All medical questions and concerns should be addressed by a personal physician. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted August 29, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted August 29, 2013 Was this done via ARTAS? Not too impressed if it was considering the high 90% yield claims.. The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Spanker Posted August 29, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted August 29, 2013 Was this done via ARTAS? Not too impressed if it was considering the high 90% yield claims.. At only 1400 grafts I don't see any reason to believe this wasn't perfect yield. My question is why was the session so small? Age? Finances? New protocol? I am an online representative for Dr. Raymond Konior who is an elite member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. View Dr. Konior's Website View Spanker's Website I am not a medical professional and my opinions should not be taken as medical advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Mickey85 Posted August 29, 2013 Senior Member Share Posted August 29, 2013 (edited) At only 1400 grafts I don't see any reason to believe this wasn't perfect yield. My question is why was the session so small? Age? Finances? New protocol? I just find it hard to believe a surgeon would purposely implant at such a low density especially in the frontal third. Clearly it is far from dense. I dont believe this was a conscious choice. Also why are there areas with some growth but there are other areas right in close proximity with little to no growth. This points to a very inconsistent yield. Edited August 29, 2013 by Mickey85 The only 2 threads you will ever need: Revamped Advantages/Disadvantages of FUE. Myths dispelled. Educate yourself Everything FUE. Manual, motorized, ARTAS, NeoGraft, physician details and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now