As I said, the photos are not high enough quality to see the issues. I can assure you it's very pluggy and the first two or so cm of my hairline are classic Turkish botch, see-through.
You can see that the left side in particular is very thin and not dense. This is not a very high res photo as it's the front-facing camera, but the hairline is still pluggy and and thin for the first 2 cm.
There are a few possible reasons, but I am guessing the quality (or lack) of my recipient site after the first procedure is maybe one. I am also concerned that maybe the planned density was too high for that area, and hence the grafts didn't survive.
We will see. I am potentially planning to remove some grafts from my hairline to try and get rid of the pluggy appearance further. But need to see what the Dr says.
The temples look amazing. Made a big difference to my face.
The hairline is still pluggy and thin, and so too the hair behind it. That's my major issue.
Yeah, the thin parts at the front and corners.. at six months I was happy with the temples and the change in the donor, but was concerned about the top, and it's the same now. The way I wear my hair helps to cover it, but definitely still sparse.
Hey everyone
Progress has been very mixed
The back looks a 100 times better but could still be improved.
Hairline shape and temples look much more refined and natural.
The top has not grown in.
I'll be going to visit the Doc later this month and will make decisions then.
I'm sure it loses potency a bit, but how much, nobody knows.
The bottles are far too large for the dose it's supposed to be used at and a waste of money ultimately