Phillyman1996

8 minutes ago, Eli_Avdikian said:

Your hair transplant should take exact measurements of your forehead and facial dimensions and decide what's best for you

My hairline is 5.9 cm it's a bit lower then my other thirds I think

13 minutes ago, Eli_Avdikian said:

it's kind of low already. Your priority should be adding more density to the frontal third

Ideally how low should the hairline be placed on me?

1 minute ago, Konsole93 said:

Your hairline is already proportionately too deep.

In addition, your density is not sufficient, I would rather condense the old approach.

Yes I'm going to add more density too deep you mean already too low?

2 minutes ago, BaldV said:

Then no dont lower it

Why is it a bad idea to create a low hairline with a transplant?

Just now, BaldV said:

What is the distance of your hairline from the blue line?

 

It's 5.9 from the mid eyebrow

Question I had a transplant 11 months ago almost would it be a smart idea to go even lower?

7 minutes ago, BackFromTheBrink said:

You can see thinning in the typical Norwood 3 area and also in the vertex and midscalp.

I'd say there's signs of NW5 (with the bridge in the midscalp being solid, so not yet 6).

That said, it's hard to say whether it'll end up 5,6 or 7 without seeing the crowd from behind.

 

Thanks I'm on finateride and minoxdil I'm age 27 I hope I keep alot of my hair

Is my pattern atypical ? Also what Norwood does it look like I'm heading to?

Looking good sent you a message

Maybe I should get a beard transplant to thicken up my beard lol

53 minutes ago, ScottishGuy21 said:

A buzzed head is the best way to detect.

When I got my first procedure for frontal work I was actually quite shocked at how sparse my midscalp and crown was once buzzed. Clear NW5 pattern. Crown not dipped yet but it’s certainly an eye opener 

 

 

What number buzzcut is this?

2 hours ago, Melvin- Admin said:

If you wet his hair, guaranteed you see a lot of scalp. 

Melvin I have some crown thinning at age 27 does that mean I will end up a 6 or 7?

19 minutes ago, gillenator said:

I remember when you posted some pics several months ago and your recipient area was thinner in visual density…it’s looking much better however IMHO, another pass would look better and more natural instead of lowering it.

I've been told my hairline is already on the lower side I always liked those really low hairlines how much percent of natural density 1 achieve with 1 transplant? Is it 30-40 percent of original density?

5 minutes ago, MildSeven said:

i guess you are 6.5cm right ?

similiar to andy lau's

 

if you want to add some widows peak in middle of hairline is okay

looks good... it would take around 250-400 graft and will be perfect..

Where are you getting these measurements from?

4 minutes ago, MildSeven said:

i guess you are 6.5cm right ?

similiar to andy lau's

 

if you want to add some widows peak in middle of hairline is okay

looks good... it would take around 250-400 graft and will be perfect..

5.9 cm-6

Just now, MildSeven said:

Looks Weird to asian face

more suitable for afro / black guy....

You ever see really low hairlines in asian men?

2 minutes ago, MildSeven said:

No

its already suited to your face bro

I know this is aggressive but I want something like this

1 minute ago, Emiry said:

Your hairloss isn’t severe and your donor is plenty. No issue

Would it be a good idea to go for this hairline?

Had a transplant 6.5 months ago thinking about bringing forward the temple peaks more and lowering the hairline a bit more maybe rounding out the hairline on the corners thoughts?

Pictures would help

31 minutes ago, Melvin- Moderator said:

Would you go to the same clinic? Can you post a picture of the front?

18 minutes ago, GeneralNorwood said:

 

And this guy has no temporal peaks and doesn't look great. 

 

 

So generally Captain America looks good despite his mediocre hair(Norwood 2) withouth temple points. His jawline is as sharp as the base of the pyramid of Cheops at Giza. Hallo effect.

Should I get my temple peaks done?

15 minutes ago, Fue3361 said:

To be fair, his hairline does not look unnatural.  It just looks too low aesthetically due to proportions.  He could easily have had a NW0 hairline a bit higher up, and it would look great.  This photo is not a good example of "NW0 is bad", but of "he went too low based on facial proportions".

I'll chime in to what most people here already said.  If you have progressive balding, you probably can't afford the grafts to go back to full NW0, as it's simply too many.  You don't have infinite donor.

If on the other hand, you're similar to me, and have no balding, go for it.  Just make sure you have a good surgeon.  To get a NW0 look, you usually need temporal work, and that is very hard to do.  Most surgeons will leave you looking like a clown as they're simply not good enough for temporal peaks.

I had mine done, and the result is great, but be careful and make sure you do your research when contemplating it.

Yes yours looks amazing I'm also looking for temporal peak work

31 minutes ago, baldfighter said:

Can someone post a picture of an unnatural NW0 guy? Let's assume that the HT was done properly, no multi's in hairline, no bad angles, hairline not ridiculously low, just a normal NW0, would it look unnatural on an old guy?

22 minutes ago, baldfighter said:

hairline looks a bit low tbh, what is the distance from glabella to hairline?

5.9 cm