Raker

5 hours ago, keltharan said:

Hello Raker. Regarding Dr. Ferreira in Portugal, could you tell me his 1st name and/or clinic?

Thanks!

Keltharan - I think this is his website - (promotional link removed) although, I’m assuming he splits his time between Madrid & Porto now. Good luck 

Not sure where you’re based but Dutasteride is readily available for purchase online in the UK market. 

Keltharan - I think this is his website - brunoferreira.com although, I’m assuming he splits his time between Madrid & Porto now. Good luck 

3 hours ago, Bill - Managing Publisher said:

You either don’t know how to read or are an inherent trouble maker.  Didn’t you read what I wrote?  Again I said - 

“Now, there are some exceptions to that rule as I’ve seen some pretty impressive results from physician members of our community using some of the fancier machines. But it does go to show that the skill and experience of the surgeon is paramount over the type of device or machine they use. “

if you continue twisting my words or Melvin’s I’m going to assume that you’re here only to stir the pot and poison the well - and we will have to suspend your posting privileges. 

Bill

No I’m not illiterate and I was questioning you on a quote that to me is confusing & contradictory. That said, I also respect & understand there are rules to be adhered to. 

Well presented article, hopefully third time lucky for you. Lots of success with your journey. 

12 minutes ago, Melvin-Moderator said:

I wasn’t referring to someone who hasn’t had a procedure yet. It’s not mandatory to post your pictures or results. However, be mindful that most surgeons notify their patients that they will be posting their results on the forum. How would you feel if people were referring to your results this way? 

Some of you may misconstrue what I’m saying as a defense for the surgeons, but in fact, as a patient advocate it’s my responsibility to defend the patients. I’ve posted my results on this forum long before I was ever a moderator.

As someone who’s struggled with hair loss I know how much words and comments can affect someone. These results are attached to a person. No one here would appreciate their results being talked about like this. If you plan on having surgery and not post your pictures, which is your right. Be mindful of those who have the courage to post their own results for the benefit of others, that’s my final response on the issue. 

Come early 2019 I’m more than happy to post my results, it’s only fair that members have the opportunity to submit their opinion, negative or positive, I’m good with either. I understand your dilemma - forum member versus fee paying surgeon but there are many examples (not one offs) when this site is promoting fee paying surgeons with subpar results, time to address this problem. 

25 minutes ago, Melvin-Moderator said:

I didn’t refer to you in my post. I stated there is a way to post and engage other members and physicians in debate and discussions. I have never told anyone not to comment. 

You referred to posters that never posted their results, that includes me. Is it mandatory? 

4 minutes ago, Bill - Managing Publisher said:

 As an example, “hair loss mentor“ presented his opinion Both truthfully and respectfully. I happen to share his opinion as well. It does seem to me that the most impressive FUE results come from surgeons using manual or simpler motorized devices rather than fancy, expensive machines like the NeoGraft, SmartGraft or ARTAS.    Now, there are some exceptions to that rule as I’ve seen some pretty impressive results from physician members of our community using some of the fancier machines. But it does go to show that the skill and experience of the surgeon is paramount over the type of device or machine they use. 

Bill

As you share his opinion, are we now saying as quoted by HLM that all surgeons that use ARTAS are amateurs or doctors that can’t perform FUE? Just asking. 

13 minutes ago, Melvin-Moderator said:

I’m saddened to see behavior like this encouraged and applauded. Where is the respect? 

The forum is about engaging in thoughtful debate and asking questions that require a thoughtful response.  Take away the fact that some posters have never posted their results and have obvious biases and would never speak to their surgeon or about their surgeon this way. It’s easy to talk down on someone else’s results when you don’t have the courage to post your own. 

I’m not saying you can’t voice your opinion, quite the contrary. I want and encourage everyone to share their genuine thoughts and concerns. However, to simply call a result a joke, does nothing for engaging in a conversation or debate. 

How about stating what you see wrong with the results. How about asking for improved pictures, pictures with graft placement, whether or not the patient is on medication therapy. In fact, state the reasons why you feel a certain surgical technique or tool is inferior for x, y and z reasons. 

Ultimately, this is how the forum works and how it has advanced the hair restoration industry. Years ago when the heated debate of FUE vs FUT happened, there was valuable information that was provided on the forum. While there were insults and mud flinging, there was also well thought out responses and rebuttals. This ultimately enlightened and informed many prospective patients visiting the site. Remember those who post are a small number compared to those who simply visit and read the site. Abrasive and rude comments like “results a joke” do nothing for anyone reading.

I’m one of those posters that you refer to that hasn’t had surgery yet, does that preclude me from commenting??!! 

52 minutes ago, jj51702 said:

*counting down until Melvin comes into this thread and starts warning/threatening to ban pelodinero*

Yip, off to the naughty step he goes, bad boy pelodinero!! 

For me this is a no-brainer, Rahal is producing first class results so keep saving. 

1 hour ago, PeloDinero said:

My issue with this result is that a first time prospective patient may see this post and think this is the level of quality one should expect. It does no good in informing patients of what is really possible. 

What I’m struggling with here is the Dr is showcasing this as an example of his/machine’s fine work, baffling. It would put you off having surgery. 

Agree with the above posts, nothing to get excited about. 

Because they can, It’s all about profitability, satisfy shareholders, seeking out ways & means to maintain or increase profits, that’s life. Do what some of us do, get a prescription for Proscar and split into quarters and you’ll get four days from one tablet. 

26 minutes ago, Kiwi Guy said:

I have been using fin for about 5 years and also minoxidil for around the same time. When it comes to minoxidil I found that it does act as a hair thickener as Bill alluded to, I think with consistent prolonged use it can slow down the progression of balding, similarly to how fin does as well. I am quite worried at the moment actually because I am finding for the last year or so my hair has continued to fall out and thin even though I am using both of these, I really don't know what to do... I really want to halt or slow down my hair loss before doing my HT so that I don't just progressively worsen after my HT... any tips or advice of what I can do guys? Would be much appreciated... I might make a thread about it actually.

You might want to consider Dutasteride (brand name Avodart) it also blocks the male hormone DHT but would appear to be more potent than Finasteride, although it’s not FDA approved. Like all drugs it will come with potential risk, worth doing your homework on. 

Not all surgeons recommend Minoxidil, when I had a consultation with Dr Lorenzo he advised to stick with Finasteride (generic or brand) but drop Minoxidil & Nizoral. 

I’m afraid the jury’s out on this one, it would make life so much easier if we had a definitive answer but we don’t. I’m chopping up Proscar and having to go through the hassles of prescriptions/cost to receive it. As a “belt & braces’ approach the surgeons recommend the brand to keep themselves right. 

1 hour ago, gillenator said:

Thanks for the pics....and I agree that the blood supply can be compromised when grafting in the upper limits...yet some patients seem to do well with grafted densities above 45 cm2.

But here's the deal...you have a good base to start with and then you can always go back for a second procedure to raise the density level if you decide that is what you want....chances are greater that you will want that.

The nice thing is that you should realize higher yields having your restoration in 2 procedures verses one mega-session.

Based on your pics, you have good hair quality and I think you are going to experience a very nice result and transition...best wishes to you with your upcoming procedure!

And keep us in the loop...

Cheers, not sure I want to do more than one procedure at my age but your comments are very much appreciated. Food for thought. 

21 hours ago, Tiger1985 said:

Assuming you have an average of 2 hairs per graft and 45 grafts/cm2, this will give you a coverage value of 6.1 (caliber x number of hairs per graft x density). 5.4 is an acceptable coverage value that will give the illusion of full coverage. So you will be kore than okay with 45.

 

Here’s hoping, only time will tell. Thanks

On 12/18/2018 at 9:17 PM, Kiwi Guy said:

Awesome mate, good luck and keep us posted

Will do, thanks for the response. 

Time to wrap this thread up, boring. 

Another amazing result from Rahal, 40 grafts cm2 giving this illusion, impressive. Video far superior to stills. 

4 minutes ago, AnalogFeel said:

 

I just looked up his last 50 transplants and the only ones who are mediocre are men who are heavily bald and/or have fine/thin hair

show me his poor results on people with decent hair characteristics. His results on people with thick hair are spectacular

Maybe I'm just a very late bloomer?

 

That was quick, were these 50 transplants posted by the patients? 

1 minute ago, AnalogFeel said:

I've combed through all his results on men with wavy, ethnic hair and they're all excellent 

look at the one I just posted on that 60 year old near slick bald man who had total coverage with 3600 grafts

I combed through koniors results and none of them were impressive in terms  of getting any real density on men who are high norwood levels or even diffuse thinning 3s

How many of his results have you looked at that were posted by the patient? Not Keller. Keller’s postings do concern me, his ability to post misleading/subpar results at times that go properly unchallenged & not brought to conclusion is a worry. 

13 minutes ago, AnalogFeel said:

 

keller is recommended by all the main hair transplant websites and his results, in terms of density, are far better than Konior and at least as good as hassan and wong.

Konior is better for artistic hairlines but I have curly hair so I don't give a shit about that

look at kellers last 10 posted results here. They are all excellent except for maybe 1

You’re delusional, Keller’s results have been less than average but you’re absolutely right he’s recommended on this website which is worrying knowing guys are looking for a recommended surgeon. His posting have been misleading to say the least. I do feel for you, moreover, you have a mountain to climb to resolve your issues.