headbangerguy

nice....

wow!!!!!!

Looking at your pre-op, really amazing. I'm glad you're happy with the results.

I think this is what Dr Umar meant. If you think he failed on you twice, then it's logical to see another opinion. What's the guarantee that it would be a success on the third pass for the same doctor?

Very rare, idiopathic.

All good!

I don't see your face but I reckon 20 years (at least) was taken off of you after this amazing HT! And I thought you'd need more than 4K grafts just by looking at your pre-op. As I've said before, "Wow!!"

Your hair looks great bro (although it's from iphone). Wonder if you have better pre-op photos like the ones taken from the clinic.

Have you considered micropigmentation? Don't know if this is suggested already, but I reckon you'd rock with it.

Not anytime soon. ; )

i've looked at this thread many, many times and your result is just amazing!

Hey brother Hariri, The only thing unusual for Sean is the large amount of FUE. The last 2 reasons are I think standards for every FUE with Dr Rahal. But I'm also interested to see what's the head-to-head study between the motorized tool and the non-motorized method.

Hey Sean, sorry that you're not happy with the result so far. Definitely below the standard that we know Dr Rahal has set the bar for hairline/FUE results. Majority of his patients chose him because of the awesome hairline that we are accustomed to see. And you don't have it so far. Still rooting for you to get it after few more months but those who got great results already had great results by 6 months or so. I always think of youngandy (Hair Restoration Journal for youngandy - 6 months update), who at 3 months was already awesome, as Dr Rahal's standard for FUE/hairline although it's unfair to compare due to a number of variables involved. I still envy his results though. Goodluck brother.

amazing result. very natural.

big improvement from the pre-op!