FUT vs FUE for restoring hairline

[joeshmo209]

Which technique is better for restoring hairlines? I heard that FUT is better for restoring hairlines.

 

I would choose this as my goal is to restore my hairline, but I am worried about the scar. I would like to buzz my hair from time to time without worrying about a huge scar on the back of my head?

 

What have you heard? FUT better for restoring hairlines?

 

Here are a couple pics of my hair loss. I want to fill in the temple areas and move my hairline down.

[hsrp10]

how old are you, 24? you may want to put off a HT until your 30's, as your loss is not so severe.

 

consult with a hair restoration physician as a first step.

and as you seem to only need work in the temples and wish to buzz you hair then I would go with manual FUE with a recommended surgeon on this forum, if you do decide to procede

[thebossman]

fue would be better for your case. fut is cheaper though

[Mickey85]

FUE allows for cherry picking different caliber grafts and specific hair quantities. For hairlines, having single-hair follicles is vital for a natural appearance and FUE allows for the surgeon to target only those single-hair follicles in the donor. FUE allows for targeting grafts that are of a finer caliber from areas that strip cannot venture into also. I would personally for FUE for a case like yours but being 24 is very young.. I would reconsider given that or donor hair is finite regardless of whether we choose strip or FUE... Proceed with caution.