Sparky

I wasn't trying to be harsh, I do think Dr Rassman is a good surgeon and normally posts HT pictures like people in the real world see them, but not in this case.

its not a genuine poster, it's a shill, ignore it.

wheres the pics?

You SHOULD'T go there, they have fake photoshopped pictures on their website.

p.s, stop advertising them everywhere!

different lighting, face photoshopped in the after pics, hair styled differently, I can only assume you did all of this because the treatment was a complete failure?

Ironman isn't qualified to put forward any evidence, which scientific journals, or professionals have verified gho's work?

Nigam, hasn't achieved perpetual motion, if he did he wouldn't be in the ht industry as he would be the richest man alive.

Been on fin for years, no sides that I am aware of

who did you go with and did you have strip or fue?

If you are having second thought then hold off! This is for the rest of your life, make 100% sure that it is what you want to do.

Shaving in my opinion is necessary to make sure that all the angles are copied perfectly.

if it's not concealer then what is that stuff in his hair?

Yeah in the uk its Farjo or nothing, but don't see that as a bad thing, Farjo is a good clinic.

Don't take my word for it though, do research, lots of research and see what you come up with.

Before you answer, maybe this thread isn't the place for this discussion as it's obviously not what the OP wanted to talk about, you could start a new topic regarding this if you like?

For a start, I wouldn't believe a word that Ironman says, I've done plenty of research, and had a few unhappy Gho patients email me for my opinion on what to do next.

You believe what you like and I will express my opinion when I like and my opinion is that it doesn't work. All the pictures I've seen so far have shown a very thin result in the recipient, it's not all about the donor you know.

My opinion is that regeneration does not exist anymore than perpetual motion.

don't go to the place that did Rooney's hair, it looks awful!

those pictures are all blurry and don't show anything!

Don't think it will be very thick when it's grown out and the pattern doesn't look that natural, looks like lines,my first HT was a bit like this.

Getting a cheap HT just costs you more in the future, I would say you will need more added to this and when you do this, do some more research.

I don't think that donor regeneration exists at all, I've never seen any good results from Gho and think it's all hype.

the discussion doesn't have to end there, but I am saying that I do not agree with you, I don't see what else I can say.

ignore him, he's just trying to promote his own clinic

Ok, but I just think if we are going to point out and harp on all the so called negatives about FUT then isnt it fair to discuss Neograft which is clearly one form of FUE. (see quote below, and other graphics I have already posted)

 

 

 

In fact I would think it is a bit irresponsible to be stressing how great FUE is, how FUE has all these supposed advantages over FUT and not discuss the problem of Neograft in the FUE industry.

 

Newbies browsing the forum could easily read these threads in the FUE/FUT debates and think "hey FUE sounds great"....then they see the countless ads in every major city offering FUE Neograft and book a surgery based on the FUE cheerleading and get major disappointing results from Neograft FUE.

 

I just think patients need to be aware of Neograft FUE which is really being pushed as the new savior and sold as FUE. Several friends have asked me about "hey this Neograft is being advertised on the radio...whatta ya think? I know if I was a newbie and was maybe considering a top FUT doctor like Arocha, Feller, Lindsey, Hasson, Wong, ect...ect...but was swayed that FUE was better and ended up going with Neograft it could be a disaster.

I can see we are going round in circles and you just like to argue with whomever disagrees with you, even when they say you are entitled to your own opinion.

I disagree with you, this is my opinion, no need for you to keep 'harping on'

Before I leave this thread I just want to say that no one should ever have neograft.

By the way, I'm only stating my opinion, not telling you what you should think, if you want to think it's fue and that it gives fue a bad name that's fine.

doesn't matter what their ad says. It's not fut, but I don't consider it to be fue either, not going to go on with this, this is what I think, end of.

not really, Neograft is just a blackmark on itself and any of the Drs who use it.

My opinion is that fue is done with a manual punch by hand, if it's motorized it's fue, but motorized.

This is my opinion and you can take it or leave it no problem.

True...but it is really hard to compare years and years of FUT with a relatively new concept. The numbers are just not there to make a fair comparison as to over-all patient satisfaction and complaint level. Hasnt there been horror stories from NEOGRAFT which is FUE? All FUT is not created equal and so it seems with FUE.

I personally don't consider Neograft to be fue, it's just a disaster really.

I consider fue to be grafts extracted with a manual punch, motorize it and it's motorized fue.

Thanks champ, i apprciate that. Sadly my procedure did not go as smoothly as most. I should have either gone fue or not done anything at all. Its why i tell guys with very minimal hairloss to just enjoy their lives. Spend the money on a month long holiday in a tropical climate. Id like to chat with you about your repair because i have heard bits and pieces. I will PM you soon. Sleep time for me hehe.

Sure no problem