AnalogFeel

you think transplanted hair not growing is a genetic issue?

why would a very healthy young man get a zero growth transplant of nearly 11K hairs? what happened with all that hair?

you guys have to understand - I paid a ton of money and was promised the world by doctor Keller 6 months in, I'm getting minimal to no results. I'm going crazy

dude I posted post operation pics already. I'm not trolling and you guys think it's really possible to have a surgery like this with basically zero to minimal yield? I'm a healthy young man. Why wouldn't all that hair transplanted grow in? Doctor Keller transplanted a HUGE amount of hair

Have you ever seen anybody like this get basically zero yield?

not really

I've combed my hair back, you can see plenty of scalp I've combed my hair back after blowdrying hard and fluffing it up. It's not even a quarter as impressive as that my crown is bald as hell dude, there's no way to really comb over it that dude is basically same case as me - challenged up top, supremely gifted on sides. He had 2800 grafts done - 70% of which were 3s and 4s. This is the result I'm expecting

the first pic is extremely patchy - looks nearly identical to me the 2nd pic is incredible density - looks like a very solid NW1.5 with zero diffuse loss. I don't care about lighting - no kind of lighting can make diffuse loss hair look that perfect. You can't even see a millimeter of scalp there

Keller's not posting pics with bad lightning then ones with good lighting. The before and after pics are very similar

show me one Konior or Panine transplant with as massive of an improvement in density as the pics I"ve posted by Keller Again, I have curly hair. I don't give a shit about a perfect artistic hairline Expectations were way out of reality? I can show you multiple transplants on men who were much much more bald than me with results I would be totally happy with

I don't want my childhood density back My childhood hair was so thick that it was nearly impossible to comb/style. I want about half or like 40% of my childhood density back and my crown fixed 40% to half my chidhood density will give me nearly perfect looking hair to the untrained eye

the biggest thing encouraging me is that gentleman who has nearly identical hair traits AND baldness level to me was shown post op pictures at about a year

no they didn't dude. Look again I'm telling you - the doctors apply a solution that makes all the native hairs stick together and makes it very easy to transplant hair. That has nothing to do with a poor result

There are tons and tons and tons of transplants on here on people with diffuse loss like mine where they put the transplanted hair in between native hairs

This is the closest overall case to my own that I have ever seen. NW5 pattern, diffuse loss, very thick/wavy hair with supreme donor density to what's encouraging for me is those results were posted a year after the transplant so maybe I am a late bloomer like that? I just don't see any way how a well recommended surgeon like this can get less than say a 70% yield from the grafts and even a 70% yield will make a huge difference just FYI for you guys. Doctor keller told me his yield was like 98%, which means i should have the most spectacular transplant in history of the world, for whatever that's worth

1)the transplanting into native hairs area is not anything new. He's been doing that for 20 years. They apply some kind of solution that makes all the native hairs stick together and makes it pretty easy to transplant hair in between 2)I was recommended Keller, Panine and Konior in Chicagoland area. I looked through all their work and Keller's work was the best by far in terms of pure density. I don't give a shit about artistic hairlines - I have curly hair. All I care about is pure density to here is a very similar case to mine - receded hairline with huge crown and he is basically a thick/dense NW2 now to I looked through all of Konior's and Panine's work and none of them were as extreme as that

I just don't understand how a different surgeon would have made this much of a difference? Keller is extremely well recommended on 3 different sites. Are you guys saying he is garbage?

legend I forgot to tell you. They spray the native hair with this sticky stuff that makes it very easy to insert the new grafts I strongly doubt that was issue. Keller been doing transplants and many of them for a long time. He knows what he is doing

You're saying I'm going to have almost zero yield from a 4000 graft surgery? even worst surgeons should have a 60 to 70% yield right?

I have the thickest facial hair known to mankind and should still have easily another 7000 grafts available but I really really don't want another surgery

if you're destined to be a NW6, is it pretty much stupid to be on the big 3? Are high norwoods generally not responsive at all to treatments long term?

I don't know what pictures you're looking at. I have the same very coarse, wiry, wavy, thick hair of Indian people As far as donor density goes, look at the sides in the original pic in this thread. The density on the sides is supreme. If I grow it out just a bit, it's like a jungle on the sides. He showed me the 4K grafts, it was tons and tons of 3s and 4s When I grow out my facial hair, it's the thickest, most dense facial hair you've ever seen. I have crazy thick hair everywhere except top of my head

what's the end result? Does it look decent in the end? would it have really made that much difference going to hassan and wong over keller?

Have you ever seen a surgery with such an atrocious yield from a reputable surgeon? is it unusual for growth to START at 6 month mark?

im going out of town so i can't see him