Jump to content

ML488

Senior Member
  • Posts

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ML488

  1. Neither one is "superior" imo. It is all about the surgeon skills. That being said I do beleive there may be a small advantage with DHI as far as producing a slightly more natural look more often than not. I say this because in DHI with the implanter pens the surgeon has 100% complete control over where and how the graft gets implanted as opposed to the pre made slits which can be more prone to "mistakes" in the sense that once they are made, they are made, and there's no going back if the surgeon feels a few slits at the hairline could have been placed in a slightly different manner or area. But again, if you go to a very good surgeon, you can definitely get a natural FUE result too, as seen all over.

    One thing I'm not crazy about with DHI is that the grafts appear to get handled more than FUE. They must be picked up by a tool and instead of going into the scalp, they must be inserted into the implanter pen and then even after that, you have the implantation shot from the pen itself. Just seems like more of a chance for a transection instead of simply picking up the graft and placing it into the scalp in FUE. But again - all about the surgeon and the team.

     

    • Like 1
  2. Your native hair was already super dense so this was going to be a challenge. The temple reconstruction already looked like a pretty nice dense pack, so I wouldnt really blame the surgeon that much. A lot of times a second pass is needed in cases like yours imo. SMP would do the trick for sure but what about Toppik with the sprayer? Just two sprays of fibers in each temple would certainly do the trick before each time you went out.

  3. @jjsrader I see what you are saying but you cannot judge a result 100% in the way you are saying until at least one year. There is definitely a change that happens over time where the transplanted hair becomes more softer and that is clear in this case when looking at the 12 month photos over the 9 month. The hairline looks beautiful, but I will agree that the temporal area could have used a bit of work to look more natural. That being said I'd be thrilled with a result like this. I have seen what you are talking about where surgeons only do very little of fine singles in front and then load up on multi's behind it rather heavily and the eye gets drawn to them as they are instantly seen through the one or two rows of fine singles. 

  4. Your result is close to the highest density you can achieve with a hair transplant imo. That being said, hair characteristics also play a part, meaning that maybe your donor hair wasn't as thick and therefore didn't produce an even greater illusion of density. All that being said, you had a pretty decent receded hairline and that has been filled in very nicely with this surgery and I personally feel you had unrealistic expectations and if I'm being blunt, are a bit spoiled. As others pointed out you are also taking some of these pictures in such a way and in such a light, (some with flash) that shows the hair in it's worse case scenario, which wouldn't ever be seen if your hair were styled and combed properly. If you should ever do anything else it should be to bring your temples more forward a bit to match up your newly straighter hairline. I think that would make for a final (and more pleasing) anesthetic look.

    • Like 1
  5. In my opinion you need at least 5 months, and that is in some of the more luckier scenarios, before you can comfortably have enough growth to move on with life and not worry about your hair and look anymore. Then after that obviously you still have more growth and thickening to come. But in the first few 3-4 months post-op you cannot expect anything much at all.

    • Like 2
  6. Kudos to you for doing some research first and yes that thread with Bicer is a great comparison thread for someone like yourself. If you are just willing to focus on the hairline and frontal third with 3k grafts I think that is a reasonable appraoch. Since your donor isn't the thickest, I personally wouldn't be crazy about an FUT given the chance that the scar may be visible at some points. Just my two cents.

  7. 13 minutes ago, NARMAK said:

    I would say to have a really chunky memory foam neck pillow that can help secure you from turning onto your sides and laying down directly on the back of the donor area. 

    Sleeping for some people naturally turns your body in many directions so depending on that factor, you might want to try sleep upright in a chair that reclines that keeps you "squished" in one position and prevents you turning onto your sides. 

    Its going to be very difficult for me. Never in my life have I not slept on my side. I think I've fallen asleep on a couch laying back a bit a few times in my life. A recliner might be a good idea, though I doubt a hotel room is going to have one of those. @JoeMan I haven't booked anything just yet.

  8. This is one of the most cringe things I've ever read. What happened last night was 100% legit. You really think Will freakin Smith would damage/ruin his entire 30 year career and reputation by agreeing to fake physically assault someone on live television in order to "save the Oscars" get people talking about an award show again??? In 2022 of all years???

    All the same goes for Chris Rock as well, since you guys are saying he too was in on it. And anyone can grab a fraction of a second screen grab from most videos and catch an emotion or weird facial expression they want to. Chris Rock had no clue Smith was actually going to physically strike him, so he continued to just laugh until reality hit, no pun intended. He even tried to laugh it off after the fact. He's a comedian after all and was in the midst of telling jokes. Will Smith on the other hand, is a mentally unstable man. His swearing on live TV afterwards that loudly and to that dramatic of an effect, not to mention his bizarre breakdown during his acceptance speech, was real. Yes I know the man is an actor, but never would anyone (multiple people in this case) on that level of celebrity status want to “stage” something that crazy . 

    • Like 2
  9. 1 hour ago, PutTheFolliclesInTheBag said:

    I've just had my surgery with Ferreira at the beginning of the month and these threads keep me sane! Will post my own on here too but originally wanted to wait until I see results, might change my mind and post earlier for emotional support though lol

    Would love to hear/see how it went in a thread.

  10. I have just been thinking and could be completely ridiculous for asking this, but does anyone think that there is a slight chance that graft survival might be slightly less with the DHI technique? Unlike regular FUE where the grafts are very gently placed into the premade slits, DHI you have every single graft seemingly shoved into an implanter and after that, the implanter, with graft inside, is basically injected down into the scalp, sometimes in a forcefull manner. Just a thought. What does everyone think?

×
×
  • Create New...