Britanium

It’s important that people are given options on what is available, FUT is still being done (albeit less) and it still has its place for some individuals. Those with a poor donor area can still benefit from having FUT first. Or as it’s being done by Dr Bisanga and Medispa, combo hts can be used if needed. It really depends on the person. It’s important that it’s given serious consideration though as the inherent strip scar isn’t for everyone. Still some really good FUT work being done (mostly US) H+W, Hattingen, Bloxham for example.

You should leave it at least 12 months after having a hair transplant before getting another. Although it’s ok to start consultations beforehand..

If 2.5k isn’t enough, which is likely to be the case, then yes definitely consider Eugenix !

Have you got any pics of the hair transplant itself ? Thanks 🙏

I would like a “sigh here we go again emoji” everytime some asks “best/cheapest place in Turkey/Istanbul” question 😉

@HairaidCome on did you really join just to say this about Dr Arshad? Or are you a former member…? It’s a lil more than suspicious when someone joins and immediately makes a post such as this. You have to have knowledge of what’s been happening, a lurker or previous user?

@HairyypotterHope all is well ! 👍🏽we are wondering how your hair is progressing !

Looking forward to hearing about Eugenix’s feedback, hopefully they can see the potential here 👍🏽

Yeh I have asked/requested the range of emoji’s be increased! We need more of a range when it comes to reactions 👍🏽

Easy 3k worth of grafts, most likely twice that available ! 👍🏽

Exactly that, It’s always going to come down to who we feel is the best Dr for our particular needs 👍🏽

If we’re talking about BHT and what can be achieved I think you should check out @AB2000and see what Dr Umar can do 😉One of the pioneers! And has pretty much used every hair possible 👍🏽

No worries 😉 I’m going to be watching this thread closely and see what @Eugenix Hair Sciencessay 🙏 If you have seen @Zoomsterthread, I’m sure you might have also seen @Gatsbytoo ? They were able to take BHT from all kinds of sources 👍🏽

I get that lol my beard is a bane of my life it’s so thick and grows so quickly! Let alone having that amount of beard + Chest hair 😉 btw it’s @J.A.Cnot the one above 🤓

Yeh it is more a Norwood 7, the scalp hairs are going to be slim pickings, it’s everywhere else you have in abundance. Scalp hairs are needed to create any kind of hairline, this might be a challenge, but if anybody can achieve it then it would be Eugenix or Bisanga.

Those 2 choices are definitely who came to my mind whilst I was reading.... 👌

Wow 😯 And I thought my beard was impressive! You have a awesome amount of BHT to tap in too/supplement your available scalp hair 👍🏽 This is going to be a fascinating journey.

@JoeFromFriscoHow is it looking ? Been a while since we have seen a update 👍🏽

Excellent news ! That will really help toward your repair with Dr Mwamba 👍🏽

The donor has recovered really well ! This is looking really good at this early stage 👍🏽 Thanks for the update 🙏

Great update 👍🏽And it’s always nice to hear of Dr Bicers after care !

@GrantYou were asking this on another thread 👍🏽

Myself and another member asked why Dr Reddy was removed? Is it because he has a new clinic?

So far I have not seen anybody mentioning anything other than poor growth, and personally the most recent one I saw poor planning. That’s just my opinion, I have no issue in praising the other decent results I have seen, I don’t think he’s a poor Dr, I just see issues that can hopefully be rectified. But it’s a lengthy process to see if the improvements will lead to better growth, hopefully we see it. I definitely don’t think it’s a witch-hunt, I have seen this happen with other Drs. I like the after care he shows, just that the “top ups” shouldn’t be needed on such a regular basis. Those guys have already used their finite donor supply, let’s hope from now on it won’t happen. Of course we all know that on occasion poor growth can occur for a multitude of reasons, just when a pattern emerges we have to be paying attention.

The forums recommended list has gone through changes ever since it’s inception. Clinics/Drs have come and gone. It’s not just a case of those who are willing to contribute will always be mentioned and they are certainly not promoted/marketed. It’s always been the case that the forum/mod will decide if someone should be considered and then recommended. Just recently a Dr was considered and it was decided it was too early for them to be recommended. Also the recommended list has been reduced recently, so it shows that its always evolving/changing. We can all think of some Drs/Clinics we believe are worth recommending but they need to agree to being Involved/included and they will have to go through the process of being vetted. A lot of this seems to stem from some of Dr Arshads results, which are sub par IMO, particularly around those which are approx 9-12 months ago. A lot of members have commented that they also think they bar sub par, and some of the guys posting the results agree and are also disappointed. We have also seen quite a lot of “top ups” needed. All I ask is that the questions are asked to Dr Arshad and his results are reviewed. We all are wondering why this is happening.