NAVI

But I believe that after 10 12 months the patient again loses 10 percent density which is due to a mismatch of anagen phases for certain hairs as told by Dr arika.so is it safe to assume this is pretty much the final result?

In the other forum , you told hair transplants can look normal without harsh lights and if I am not wrong euginix has been providing good coverage and density even for norwood 6. At least in normal sunlight, it should not look very thin because we will be in sunlight for a good amount of time.may be his hair is very thin and short hair is the culprit. And I also remember asking you, in another thread,about how good 40 percent density is and you showed me pic of gordon Ramsay and that looked great to be honest, nothing like it would be see through in sunlight. I am thinking 40 percent density should be good enough to give an illusion of full hair even in sunlight and that's what zoomster might have been planted with.

Why it thinning is visible in sunlight?I dont want to sound negative but I was thinking hair transplant can provide coverage at least if not volume.

Can you in an honest opinion tell how close ur hair is now compared to ur original hair?Since you have one of the best hair transplants , I just wanted to know how good you think are your hair now? Are the angles similar to what you had originally and is the overall illusion similar? In an earlier post also,I requested you to post ur pic with original hair vs now after hair transplant. Just wanted to understand how far can I reach with ht.looking forward to ur reply.

One thing that is most important in hair transplant is hairline. Is it really that natural? Does it really mimic the original hairline really closely even with the best surgeons? How do people here feel about their transplanted hairlines? Are they undetectable for them?

Can you be on television on screen like on tv shows with a hair transplant?I mean cameras are so clear that even small changes are visible. Do you think with a hair transplant a person can be confident enough to be on screen in front of camera. Actors do that all the time but do they use concealers to avoid any detection. On screen is pretty much the ultimate test, any thinning is visible.

For most people shaving is out of question. Hair is an extremely important part of self esteem and image.

Can anyone easily detect a hair transplant with a shaved head? I mean is shaved head look even possible with a hair transplant? It should look thinner on top quite noticeably.

Many doctors put patients on finastride when they do transplant. How to figure out how much of the growth was due to the transplant and how much do finastride contribute? You never quite get to know that. I believe they look a lot better with people who get regrowth from finastride and that's why the results are bit deceiving than doctors show them to be.

I hope you talking about Ur transplant results and other hair transplanted patients and not about ur original hair

Is hair transplant detectable in restaurants and open spaces. Like if we are sitting in a restaurant , would someone looking at our head know that he is thinning .you know that some restaurants have lights and I mean would I became conscious that I am looking thinned?

Is hair transplant a see through in sun light. I mean would people know that I have a hair transplant if I go in sunlight?

Why don't you show us how you looked like with your full density pre hair loss and how far you have come with a transplant?it would be good to compare your results and get an idea. I am actually relying now on just hair transplants and not wanting to touch finastride because if they can be that good ,why take finastride.

Do beard hair gel well with wavy hair ? I think beard hair are curly so they migh tblend better with people who have wavy hair like myself.

Is your hair transplant result similar to how your hair were before? I mean do you think that your transplanted hair mimic your native hair in aesthetics.Density ,volume and angular placement.it will be great if you can show a photo pre hairloss and post hair transplant. I just want to see how close can we get to our original aesthetics.

Is euginix providing it?

But is the texture of donor similar to native hair. I am thinking if my donor is not as wavy, I still would not get that puffy effect in my hairline

Are transplanted hair placed in a similar fashion to that of the original hair?I could earlier make a volumised puff on my hairline which might have to do with my wavy hair or with the angles of my original hair. Will the doctor be able to give me similar graft placement so as to make that puff, which I consider the most important feature of my face. We also need to take into account the fact that the density will also be reduced to 40.

What is the approximate area in Norwood 6? Even it is 200 sq cm on the whole, the density you have stated will require 8000 grafts approx. But normally the are is more than 200 cm I believe. I don't know how can euginix give such high density , math is just not there. One question more , what if a person has a diffuse thinning with 20 grafts /cm left on his head. Can 40 more be added to make it 60?

Does hairloss stabilise after 30 for most men? I am a diffuse thinner with 30 percent density left and 32 years old. Should I expect that I would stabilise now?

Is 25 percent enough for getting coverage in the crown? 25 percent would probably be a see through even in normal light. Can someone post any article about hair loss looks like Vs percentage of hair loss?

I had hair like Zayn Malik but no more. I will be happy if 50 percent can get me there. Plus some topikk and I will be there.

You are still not getting me, I want to ask will the volume of the hair look same under normal conditions? I mean, to us ,Zayn Malik would look same even if loses 50 percent hair? Won't there be reduction of his hairline volume which would be evident even without harsh lightening. I know it would not look thin still but there would be some difference to the overall volume that will be detectable? Obviously we are not talking about harsh lightening hair.in the attached picture, do you think he will look exactly similar with 50 percent loss.i still doubt.

Would this appearance of fullness look exactly same as it was with original hair? I think , it cannot look as good as 100 percent hair. If it looks exactly the same , then hair transplants essentially have the capability to give pre hair loss look with 50 percent density in front specially.i highly doubt that's the case,I might never look how I use to with hair transplant.but if that's indeed the case, I would be happy.

Doctors say that hair thinning does not become evident until 50 percent is lost. Does it mean that hair look exactly similar to the naked eye even if 50 percent is lost or does it mean that thinning is not visible until 50 percent is lost. I don't think hair can look exactly similar with 50 percent hair loss because it would lead to a reduction in 50 percent volume so the mane might not look as thick although thinning might not be apparent?thoughts?