I just want to be sure that I am clear on a few things here. It may have been posted in this thread or another already but, it seems that this one is popular and it may receive a quicker response. A few questions/clarifications please.
1. From what I understand, this is essentially an FUE procedure BUT instead of removing the entire graft only part of it is removed and transplanted. This is how the doctor is able to preserve the donor area as the entire follicle isn't removed?
2. Follow up to question 1, is an entire follicle from the donor area required to produce a new follicle in the recipient area? Can half a follicle have the same result as a full?
3. Cost, is this on par with FUE procedures?
I am not trying to take sides as I have followed the thread and see some cleverly worded contention between the believers and non-believers, but I am skeptically excited about the prospects.
On one hand this is a newer procedure from a surgeon who I have heard little about, with little to go off of but a couple of results. On the other hand, if the issue of limited donor supply has potentially been resolved than this brings hope to the more advanced NW cases. Sure the proven procedures have been refined and proven to have excellent results but there is always that donor supply issue.
I would like to see some more surgeons use this procedure as well as more results before I would consider going under the needle. Caveat Emptor