Bill - Seemiller Posted June 17, 2009 Share Posted June 17, 2009 Recently, I read a well written summary of the follicular unit extraction (FUE) procedure, its advantages, and it's disadvantages by Dr. Ron Shapiro who recently started to experiement with FUE at his clinic. Today, I published it on our highly popular Hair Loss Q&A Blog. In my opinion, FUE has been overhyped online by some clinics while underestimated by others. Reading this well balanced article was extremely refreshing. I'd encourage anyone interested in considering FUE to read "The Evolution, Advantages, and Disavantages of Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) Hair Transplant Surgery". Feel free to offer your input on this thread. Best wishes, Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Acrobaz Posted June 18, 2009 Senior Member Share Posted June 18, 2009 I agree - an excellent article. It's particularly useful in demonstrating that there is no universal right or wrong answer for the best technique, but that much depends on a variety of factors, ranging from patient physiology to available cash. For me, the clincher in going for strip was maximising the yield from the permanent safe zone. Kudos to Dr Shapiro. 17 Feb 09 - 3,200 FUs by strip surgery (Dr Feller) My Hair Loss Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Curious Posted June 20, 2009 Senior Member Share Posted June 20, 2009 I find the article biased against FUE. There's no mention of the grafts lost when a strip is cut from the donor site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member bullitnut Posted June 20, 2009 Senior Member Share Posted June 20, 2009 yeah i too read that the other day on another forum and have to agree with you Bill its a great write up and a refreshing read. As Acrobaz says kudos to Dr Ron for a great educational article 2 poor very poor UK ht's 2 world class repairs with Shapiro Medical Group original thread http://www.hairrestorationnetwork.co...d.php?t=134995 Dr Paul's procedure http://www.hairtransplantnetwork.com/blog/home-page.asp?WebID=1710 Dr Ron's procedure http://www.hairtransplantnetwork.com/blog/home-page.asp?WebID=1128 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member imissthebarber Posted June 20, 2009 Senior Member Share Posted June 20, 2009 I agree that this is an excellent article. I would also add that IMO it makes sense for a potential HT patient to consult with a clinic that offers both FUT and FUE (or at least separate clinics that between them offer both). This way they should get the best opinions on both sides for which technique might suit them best. I do have a question though. Dr Ron mentioned as an advantage of FUE Ideal for repairing donor scars that can't be excised Does this mean that excising and reclosing a widened scar is the better first course of action (rather than filling via FUE) where it is possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member PLEASE GROW PLEASE Posted June 20, 2009 Senior Member Share Posted June 20, 2009 Excellent info . Heres one he wrote for guys interested in strip http://www.regrowhair.com/hair...richophytic-closure/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member the B spot Posted June 20, 2009 Senior Member Share Posted June 20, 2009 Originally posted by Curious:I find the article biased against FUE. There's no mention of the grafts lost when a strip is cut from the donor site. Curious, when a single blade scalpel is used in the hands of a detail oriented, top flight doctor such as Dr. Ron and Dr. Paul the loss is negligible--even if it is, say 5%--there is absolutely no data that supports fue being consistently that good on every patient. There is no bias..fue is great and is embraced fully by Dr. Shapiro--what we don't do is pretend fue is something it is not. Take Care, Jason Go Cubs! 6721 transplanted grafts 13,906 hairs Performed by Dr. Ron Shapiro Dr. Ron Shapiro and Dr. Paul Shapiro are members of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member the B spot Posted June 20, 2009 Senior Member Share Posted June 20, 2009 Does this mean that excising and reclosing a widened scar is the better first course of action (rather than filling via FUE) where it is possible? In many cases, reducing the actual scar via strip excision is the best option first. The idea is even if you can reduce a wide scar by 50% (ie scar is 8mm wide, reduced to 4-5mm) then there is simply less surface area to disguise. Another point is for some patients, excising a wider than normal scars say 4-5mm wide, which is right outside the 1-2.5mm scars we are looking for, down to a 1.5-2mm that new thinner scar may be able to be truly disguised. Of course, there are those who will simply not go through another strip session and for them fue is a great choice. Hope this answers your question! Jason Go Cubs! 6721 transplanted grafts 13,906 hairs Performed by Dr. Ron Shapiro Dr. Ron Shapiro and Dr. Paul Shapiro are members of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member imissthebarber Posted June 22, 2009 Senior Member Share Posted June 22, 2009 Thanks Jason yes that pretty much covers it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now