Jump to content

Gorpy

Senior Member
  • Posts

    1,192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gorpy

  1. Those are excellent observations Emperor. It is true that hairs angled forward provide more of a shingled effect. That's also why many guys comb their hair forward. From what I can see, my doctor followed my native hair angle exactly. Some of my midscalp native hair does tend top point upward instead of forward. I'm not sure that it has anything to do with saggital or lateral slits. I don't know. I know Shapiro will use either wherever he feels it is necessary.

     

    I do strongly believe that there should be an emphasis on strengthening the central forelock area to prevent a see-through look.

  2. Thanks again guys.

     

    You know NN, I thought about that also. It is possible that hair transplant #1 has matured more over time and has added to the overall look. I really don't know. Although I do know that I have a heck of a lot of new hairs. I can tell the difference when they are new and not as long as the others.

     

    Is it possible that the finasteride is also helping?

     

    I'm still seeing quite a few sprouts, so this should improve more.

     

    Cover of their website? LOL. I always wanted to be a poster boy icon_smile.gif

  3. I am 6.5 months post op from my second procedure. The first picture on the left is 13.5 months post op from my first. As you guys probably recall, I wanted to add density.

     

    I have to say that I consider my 1000 graft procedure a big success. If you think 1000 grafts won't do much, this is an example of how they can. Of course this was an exceptionally high hair count 1000 graft procedure.

     

    The pictures are honest outdoor pictures in bright Arizona light (no flash).

     

    13_6stitch.jpg

     

    Top Shot I took this afternoon:

     

    2nd_6.5top_web.jpg

     

    And just for kicks, here is my original look:

     

    pre_web.jpg

  4. I am 6.5 months post op from my second procedure. The first picture on the left is 13.5 months post op from my first. As you guys probably recall, I wanted to add density.

     

    I have to say that I consider my 1000 graft procedure a big success. If you think 1000 grafts won't do much, this is an example of how they can. Of course this was an exceptionally high hair count 1000 graft procedure.

     

    The pictures are honest outdoor pictures in bright Arizona light (no flash).

     

    13_6stitch.jpg

     

    Top Shot I took this afternoon:

     

    2nd_6.5top_web.jpg

     

    And just for kicks, here is my original look:

     

    pre_web.jpg

  5. This is interesting, because I have had some interesting experiences lately. Don't get me wrong, I'm a happily married guy, but a little flirtation to stroke my ego always feels good.

     

    Anyway, my hair is getting to a point where it really looks nice now and its framing of my face gives me back some of the looks I once had. I've noticed more women looking at me and even trying to start a conversation with me.

     

    Walking around work the other day I walked by a couple of fairly young girls. I don't even know them, but I have seen them around. They both gave me the biggest wide eyed smiles with a big "Hi" - you know, the kind of look that says "I like you".

     

    To be honest, I had noticed that these things kind of quit happening to me in the last 6 or 7 years as I got older (and balder).

     

    Ah yes, the power of hair. icon_smile.gif

  6. I have broken density issues down time and time again---- and in sessions of 1000-2000 grafts, I hardly think "hair count" is going to make a difference in actual density.

     

    Whoah Bspot! I whole heartedly disagree with that. Having been the recipient of a 1000 graft procedure, with a relatively high hair count, I can confidently say that hair count does matter in such a small procedure.

     

     

    However, unless something has changed, Dr. Alexander seems to transplant in a more aggressive manner than Dr. Keene.

     

    That depends on what you mean by aggressive. When I consulted with Dr. Alexander he recommended 2500 grafts. Dr. Keene recommended 2700. It is true that Dr. Alexander was going to place them at a higher density, but only in a much smaller area (what I like to call a small "patch" of hair). Dr. Keene was more aggressive in terms of my hairline and temple coverage.

     

    Dr. Alexander uses the standard lateral slit technique. It seems all of the doctors now using that technique tend to have an overall lower hair count per graft. They use smaller grafts to achieve their high density numbers. That includes Dr. Feller, Dr. Rahal and others.

  7. At 25 I had thick hair with no signs of any hair loss. It was so thick at the hairline, it would hang down as thick bangs unless I greased it back. I'm pretty sure there were no signs of miniaturization at that point. So, I'd be interested to hear what criteria the doctor was following. I'm not criticizing, just curious.

×
×
  • Create New...