Jump to content

Gorpy

Senior Member
  • Posts

    1,192
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gorpy

  1. This is actually a difficult issue. There are many factors to consider. First of all, let it be understood that it is possible for a doctor to be too busy to post on the web. Doctors can and are involved in many things outside of the surgery room, like research, focus groups, writing for medical journals and God forbid - a social life.

     

    Over the several years that I have been involved in this forum it has been blatantly obvious that some doctors have seen it as a powerful and relatively cheap marketing tool. No doubt it is. The problem arises when the forum becomes dominated by the marketeers. Let's face it. When that happens, it loses some of the pureness of being a patient driven forum.

     

    Some doctors have come to this forum to add educational value. That is much appreciated. I love to see the doctors discuss technical issues. Others just post pictures in an obvious attempt to drum up more business. Let me give you an example. I consulted with several doctors before my transplant. About a year after my procedure one of the doctors called me asking if I was ready to do it. That doctor had very little presence at the time on this forum. Soon afterwards I was seeing numerous postings of results from the doctor. Hmmm... I have to ask myself - was business down a little for this doctor? BTW - business seems to be way up for this doctor now, so yes, it is a great marketing tool.

     

    Also, there is so much childish banter on this forum, most doctors just don't want to get involved in that kind of nonsense.

     

    So, what to do? You either, join the club, hire a promotional consultant or do it yourself and reap the benefits. Or you simply remain in the background quietly and consistently doing quality work. I think some doctors feel that self-promotion and/or hiring a promotional consultant is akin to selling out to the dark side. It has a kind of used car salesman type of feeling associated with it.

     

    It is a bit of a dilemma isn't it?

  2. Originally posted by buccap:

    Hi,

    I don't have pictures. In fact, I don't even know how to download them, but I'm curious as to why members on this board would refute the recomendations from my consult of one of the highly reguarded and recommended surgeons on this site? I was also told that my total coverage would be over 4000 hairs that includes the crown.

     

    If we didn't question the doctors from time to time, there would be no need for patient input into this forum. You posted some data and I provided feedback. Having said that, it is impossible to estimate what you need without pictures. I suspect you are showing a slight NW-4 pattern with a lot of native hair left - thus the need for such a small number of grafts. To contrast that, I am also a NW-4, but have little native hair left. I needed 3700 grafts - all in front.

  3. A couple of things:

     

    There is a difference in what is commonly called "stubble" and new hair sprouting. If the hair you are feeling is something like beard stubble, it is probably not new hair sprouting. New hair comes in baby fine. So fine that you probably cannot feel it.

     

    Second, most of your hair will sprout by month 6 or 7. It can then take several more months to become long and thick enough to be cosmetically visible. It can continue to mature for a couple of years.

     

    Dr. Rassman's blog has something on this here.

  4. This site is about recommending certain doctors - that's true. That's because they have been researched and proven to have a solid track record. Pat, the owner of this site is constantly looking for new doctors to recommend, but they MUST prove themselves first.

     

    I am also in the Phoenix area. I have heard of Dr. Friedman for years, but know nothing about his results.

  5. Kaelen,

    It is important to realize that credentials and years of experience mean very little. Time after time I have seen doctors with an impressive array of credentials to put beside their name, yet they still produce substandard work. So, for your own sake, don't base your decision on credentials. Base it on a record of consistently producing quality work.

     

    It is entirely possible that Dr. Friedman is doing excellent work. But, do you know that for sure? It sounds like you don't and I don't either.

     

    A hair transplant is a big step. Don't take it lightly and don't let geographic location make your decision for you. I would recommend Dr. Alexander based on his work. But, it would also be worthwhile to visit or do a virtual visit with Dr. Ron Shapiro, Dr. Feller, Dr. Epstein, Dr. Cooley, just to name a few.

     

    Gorp

×
×
  • Create New...