nicoandgello

Comparing Riken with other companies that failed is such a strawman lmao.

@Guy73 100 grafts per sq cm by dr Nader deserves mention.

Yeah, I know. 100mg oral spyro should lower my PSA by at least 40%. What i meant, was that I'm willing to take stronger medications, than majority of people. If i lose hair with spyro i will just use bicalutamide. If i lose with that, I will castrate myself. 2k FUT can easily give me density of 55 FU per sq cm. Im norwood 2 not 3, and my head is smaller than average.

I know, I want either of them cause they seem very ethical and enthusiastic to help people. I believe, they will take me as I have great donor, and if I maintain NW2 till 24, I will make a decent candidate.

I don't really consider myself a transgender. Right now I am taking 1.25 mg finasteride and use keto shampoo every 4 days. It halted my hairloss for 2 years now. I ordered oral minoxidil, and will start using it soon enough. I'm gonna move out from my parents by end of the year, and propably start low dose of oral spyro,as I want to still have sexual function. Right now I'm just trying to to do some research and form some realistic expectations. I will propably wait till 24, and get a small 2k FUT with either Gabel or Bloxham. Thanks for answer.

Agree with you fully, but im not usual case, as im a person that will take hormonal treatment in the future, so for me there is no chance of further Androgenic Alopecia happening, as i will have less Androgens than born females. I was thinking about graft fusing so I could get the most dense result possible, as my hair everywhere else is very thick, and I would want to match that with my hairline.

Again thank you for your reply, but I don't think we get each other. I know that to achieve natural result you have to put two rows of single grafts first in the harline. Then double grafts and so on. I understand that. My thinking is, we take 4000 grafts and make them into 3000 grafts. I know that 3000 hairs will always be 3000 hairs, but grafts can be fused and sliced from what i know. You can take Double graft and make it into two single grafts. You can take two double grafts and make them into 4 graft follicle unit. So in theory if we took 4000 grafts, and fused them into 3000 grafts we could realistically achieve better density results, beacue the number of hair would be the same with both 4000 units and 3000 units, but you could transplant those 3000 units to a smalles area with safe 60 follicular units per square cm. I'm not trying to argue you, as your knowladge is much better than mine, but it's a question if it could be done. Thanks.

Thanks for reply, Melvin. I get the density problem. That is why I have looked into fusing. I know it can be done. I try to adress the issue of blood supply, which is the reason of grafts not growing well after 50-60 futs per square cm. My idea is fusing 4000 grafts into 3000 grafts, so instead of lets say 1.8 hair per graft you get 2.5 hairs per graft, which makes high density and fullness avaiable, beacuse instead of having 100 hairs per sq cm with 1.8 average hair graft, you could get 140 hairs per square cm. I don't know if i explained it well. English is not my first language.

Hello, I'm 20 year old dude with Norwood 2. I have been lurking hair loss forums for 2 years now as I started balding at 18. I'm not thinking about hair transplant till I'm at least 23-24. I know that some clinics fuse multiple grafts to achieve 5 hair graft. I know it's not realistic to have only 5 hair grafts but I am really interested in this idea as it could theoretically achieve great density results. This is question for more knowledgeable people and doctors here. Is it possible to take out, let's say 4000 grafts, and fuse them into 3000 grafts, so there would be no blood issue with dense packing them over 60 grafts per square cm. Im asking this question as I have never seen it answered anywhere before. Thanks for help.