Jump to content

Dazed

Senior Member
  • Posts

    509
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Dazed

  1. Prevailing wisdom suggest FUT first and FUE second.  There are many posts on this question.  One thing to always do is follow the money trail.  If a doctor does both, but makes more money off FUE guess which one he will push.  You often see this bias in doctors doing laser surgery.  They will always promote the one they have in the office.  It is wise that you came here because we don't make money off whatever you choose.

  2. I would say after my 1st transplant it was noticeable, but after my 2nd transplant I never even think about it.  I spend more effort on trying to keep my hair the best length because it seems to grow really fast, and then it has a mind of its own.  You spend much more time worrying about your hair than other people spend looking at you, because they are worried about their own hair.  The one exception is if you have a weird hairdo that will draw more attention.

  3. I can't look at your pictures and tell, but I had 2300 FUE and that took 10.5 hours with 1/2 hour lunch break.  That means you got about 2.7 time the amount of grafts in 2 hours less time.  Your procedure would have been completed at 775 grafts per hour.  Unless we are dealing with time dilation or relativity or you doctor was Superman or the Flash it didn't happen.

    • Like 1
  4. 23 hours ago, aaron1234 said:

    When does hair loss stabilize? When you're dead.  

    There's no guarantee that hair loss stops at a certain age.  One can only hope.  My dad always had a great head of hair, and then he started losing it in his 60's.   

    I was watching Dr. Phil today, and what started out as a show about sluts ( actual title), but he turned it into a boring show about bullying.

  5. On 7/3/2020 at 5:17 PM, Melvin-Moderator said:

    Here’s the problem going FUE first. The surgeon will choose the most robust grafts, getting strip afterward wouldn’t be as beneficial. Many of the 2,3, and 4 hair grafts will he gone. You’ll have a strip of leftovers essentially. Best to go FUT first, and then go FUE

    Melvin, you get the Gold Star for the best explanation yet.

  6. On 6/27/2020 at 9:14 PM, hairgod22 said:

    Hey Dazed i waited a year and a half. Yes I did. they told me to keep waiting. Did you had a successfull outcome with both of your transplant ? When did you notice most of the growth ?

    I wasn't one of the guys who counted hairs with a microscope every day.  I would say with the first it just seemed to be there at 4-5 months. I remember standing outside talking to a couple of guys, and one guy said I was lucky to still have my hair, and that shook me up.  Nobody knew I had a transplant.  I really  think the 2nd was about the same stage, 4-5 months.  I am very satisfied with my results.  If you let it the wait can drive you crazy.

  7. On 6/8/2020 at 4:32 PM, LaserCap said:

    In the late 90's I was told "in 10 years."  10 years came and went and I still heard "10 years."  Then cloning...."we're close! 10 years." Then it got interesting, cell duplication. It's been 10 years - nothing.

    My personal view........Science keeps evolving, I recall discussing pigs as their Gnome is close to ours...etc, including how basic the hair follicle is.  (Quite basic when you consider the heart and other organs).  You would think someone would have figured this out a long time ago.  But think about it by level of importance.  Hair is way down there.  10 years? Tell you what, add up every time you read 10, (70).  Perhaps.....

    I have been on this forum since 2009, and they said it would be here in 10 years.  I keep waiting for the big announcement.

×
×
  • Create New...