Jump to content

Aftermath

Senior Member
  • Posts

    622
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Aftermath

  1. 32 minutes ago, HairLossMentor said:

    @Aftermath 

    Dr. Rahal didn't declare himself "The hairline King"... his patients did. But as with anything you should back up claims with proof… So below is the proof. There are thousands of examples on this form alone… I encourage you to use the search function.

    Here are just a few...

    "he's called the hairline king"
    https://www.hairrestorationnetwork.com/topic/51249-dr-rahal-3025-grafts-fut/

    "The Hairline king!!! 
    https://www.hairrestorationnetwork.com/topic/46745-dr-rahal-3185-graft-fut-nw-3-6-months-post-op/

    I'm also calling you on your "lacks consistency" and "patients disappear" statement... Dr. Rahal is one of the most consistent" doctors in the business. 

    - Search the forms and you'll find thousands of happy patients... And "very few" unhappy patients... He's been doing this for 30+ years... Thousands upon thousands of procedures… I would say that's "consistent"... Wouldn't you? 

    -Even the elite hair transplant surgeons don't bat hundred percent... A small percentage of guys… For whatever reason...will need a touch up. It's the human body… There are factors outside of their control. Don't get a hair transplant unless you can accept that fact. 

    - What's important is… How did the doctor react?… Meaning did he do everything in his/her power to make the patient happy. Elete hair transplant surgeons at Dr. Rahal's level do just that… They have one goal really, make sure you are happy.

    …The above are just a couple of reasons why I chose Dr. Rahal for my hair transplant.

    I've been at this for a long time… and I see when posters like you throw little "jabs"… which aren't true… just to get patients/guys wild up...

    Making sure you  say in the same sentence "it's your opinion" just to cover your tracks… that's telling.

    So based on that… "In my opinion" you are a shill. 

    There are certain doctors in the industry who are consistent… And care for their patients... few and far between in this industry sadly. Dr. Shapiro, and Dr. Wong are 2 others I have great respect for. Both are consistent and produce amazing results. 

    --------------------------------

    @bman3082 It's great to see you back man. And awesome to see you asking questions… Sharing your experience.

    Sorry I had to waste my time on @Aftermath. His goal is to get guys riled up with statements like "failure" or "not consistent." He knows full well it's all BS. 

    Reality is… You went with one of the best... 

    ✓ consistent
    ✓ natural results
    ✓ hairline King
    ✓ ethical
    ✓ experience

    It's too early to judge anything... but based off what I'm seeing (40 grafts cm/2) you are right on track.

    40 grafts cm/2 is a low density hair transplant... and it's going to look thin. Especially since you have dark hair/pale skin and contrast between hair and scalp is high.

    It's important you keep your expectations in check. Meaning don't expect a typical Rahal Hairline. You need minimum 50-60+ grafts cm/2 (depending on hair characteristics). 

    Not that you have anything to worry about… Everything indicates (from what I'm seeing) your hair transplant will be a successBut it will look thin. Again, thin does not mean your hair transplant was a failure. It just means you received 40 grafts cm/2... And will need some creative styling to achieve the look you're after. This is just the reality. Anyone who says different is lying.

    What's key here is that you went with Dr. Rahal...One of the most ethical doctors in the business. So even though 40 grafts cm/2 will look thin… And it sounds like you knew that going into it. Dr. Rahal will most likely increase the density for free… That's just who he is

    Good luck and keep us posted... You have nothing to worry about.

    Sounds like an infomercial😂 chill out mate I’m entitled to my opinion, not trying to get under anyone’s skin. Bottom line whether it’s rahal or whoever it is if they fail to get even a 50% yield (I realise I’m this case it’s far to early to tell) then I wouldn’t be going back to them. There are also a few threads where things appear to have been going less than optimal and then they disappear, wasn’t making any accusations, just wondering why this was. And as far as consistency, maybe it’s the cross sections of threads that I’ve seen, but they’re either out of this world good or sub par, to me that’s not consistant, that’s all I’m saying. I’ve always said that on his day rahal produces great results, but personally I wouldn’t put my faith in him, not saying anyone else shouldn’t, but we are all big boys and can make our own mind up and can have our own opinions, really no need to go into so much detail personally addressing me 

     

    also how many times can you say it’s a success but it’ll look thin? Sounds to me like Lit wasn’t told about any issues with it being thin until after the procedure, and knowing the guy he is wouldn’t have agreed to a surgery if it was mentioned pre op it would be thin. Informed consent only works pre not post surgery 

  2. 5 minutes ago, bman3082 said:

    Man honestly idk what to think at the moment. Going to see him next week but im pretty stressed about whether this is fixable. I really don’t know why i didn’t push farther for more recession, i really hope its correctable and i can just move on because 7 months later, my situation is probably worse off than before

    You’re not in a worse position mate,  regardless of how much more this improves or doesn’t improve, you have hair where you didn’t before, you’re one step closer to your end goal and one more procedure will see you reach your goal. However if this doesn’t improve I certainly wouldn’t be returning to rahal for a repair, free or not

  3. 1 minute ago, bman3082 said:

    rahal does have strong marketing, but so do so many others on this forum. I'd say the only surgeon who could care less and has more business than anyone is konior and that speaks volumes. Again, obviously rahal is a great surgeon, but there is more to a surgery like this than just the surgeon...

    On his day rahal is top class I agree, he’s just not consistant enough for me when compared to hasson, konior, Lorenzo etc. And yeah that could be down to what techs are working on that day. I’ve been to hasson over a period of 8 years or more and there is unbelievable consistency in staff with very little staff turnaround, and I honestly have just as much faith in them as the doc

  4. 5 hours ago, Spanker said:

    This isn't a sub par result becuase no result has been shown or reported. 4 months and 3 weeks was his last update and that is hardly an outcome. 

     

    Im not defending the clinic, but to call this particular result subpar really isnt fair IMO. 

     

     

     

    Tbh I meant to quote this this thread:

    my bad, there have been a few on here lately where the results (even though early) have been questionable and all of a sullen the OP disappears, just wondering what’s going on that’s all

  5. I would guess it’s both. Using concealers before the result grows in. It’s not like he can’t afford it, he has the down time, can’t see him wanting to forever be using concealers to the extent he obviously is and Gordon Ramsey who is a very close friend of his has also had FUE. When you couple all of this with a recent grade zero cut and the use of a hat followed by the use of concealers, it’s gitta be 6 months since and I’d say his results are starting to grow in since the use of concealers is a lot less obvious 

    • Like 1
  6. 18 minutes ago, baldlivesmatter said:

    Just checked his IG and either way his hair is on point!

    I'm not convinced he had a procedure done--changing looks appear to be a combination of styling and/or concealers.

    Dude reminds me of the following saying: "Men age like whisky, women age like milk" lol.

    He’s 100% using concealer these days, I can’t imagine him wanting to use it forever and shaving his head would be been the perfect opportunity to take care of it. He was also wearing a hat for a while before those holiday pics. 

  7. 2 minutes ago, 1978matt said:

    Lewis Hamilton wears some kind of system when out and about.  During races it appears his hatural hair which is really quite thin.

    Andros Townsend has clearly done something which I suspect is a high quality system.  It appears too dense to be natural and with no signs of donor depletion or scars.

    Beckham has been using concealers for years and shows no evidence of transplants.  He's got quite fine hair which comes across as thin when it's short and in harsh light.  He's probably on finasteride.

    I’m not so sure, Beckham reps didn’t deny a hair transplant when asked directly about it a few months ago, they just said it was a matter he water to keep private.

    hamiltons hair, whilst looking thinner after raves due to the helmet and sweat still looks a lot more dense than a few year back, so while he may wear a system to events (I’m not too sure about this), he has defiantly had some work done 

  8. 5 minutes ago, Curlinginthesquatrack said:

    I read back my post and think it came across in a way I did not intend or that others may see as hating on your hair transplant/being jealous of it.

    i honestly feel like this is best case scenario for most of us getting a transplant.. especially guys like us in our mid thirties.

    I also went back and looked at all the pictures and I feel as if it looks great in all the pictures. 

    i just wanted to say that your results look perfect now and don’t go beyond that as it might be risky.

    however, seems this may have been said before in your initial thread/previous hair transplant and your results got better. 

    Enjoy the hair. Looks amazing.

    I didn’t take it that way at all mate, honestly, like I said it’s all about personal preference, I just felt like a flatter hairline gives me far more styling options

  9. 1 hour ago, Melvin-Moderator said:

    You’re one of the few guys I see with impecabble hair. I mean even if I didn’t know you had surgery I would be thinking you have good hair. Variations in style is cool too from the pomp to the forward quiff, they all look good 👍🏼

    Thanks mate, I think that’s what this last surgery has afforded me, I feel confident with any style I fancy at this point, I don’t feel like I’m styling it to cover up anything, which is exactly where I always wanted to get to. Even though I had density prior to this I still felt I was restricted to certain styles, I think that was more down to me suffering recession at such a young age and that having a profound affect on me, I’m very happy and comfortable with where I’m at right now though, and I’ve been told I have 4000 FUE grafts left for a rainy day if needed a few years down the line, hopefully I won’t nees them though 

  10. 28 minutes ago, Curlinginthesquatrack said:

    Amazing... I feel the hairline is almost too perfect tho. Most surgeons I’ve been in contact with stray away from having the hairline being too straight across and even, and risk shock loss. You got just about the perfect result but a close call lol.

    It definitely doesn’t have a wig like effect but it is a few percent off being too perfect. Lol.

    its like the guy or girl who gets filler, Botox and a nose job that’s too perfect - no wrinkles, no lines, perfectly symmetrical.

    Sometimes a little imprecation actually makes you look more human and attractive. 

    you definitely look amazing but you don’t need to get any further work at this point or it could look like a pure hair transplant/fake.

    Lol I don’t feel that this is hating, you’re entitled to your opinion, it’s all good. I think hairline design preference is down to the individual, I kinda wanted a flatter, broader hairline as I wanted the slick back kinda style, and prior to the last surgery, I felt I looked too recessed to pull it off, it’s pretty much exactly where I want to be, so I’m happy, I realise it may not be everyone’s preference, but I’m ok with that 

    • Like 1
  11. 1 hour ago, yesplease said:

    I apologize, the link to your old thread won’t work for me. Can you clarify what types of procedures you had each time? (fut and fue?)

    Thanks. Looks incredible, very happy for you. 

    https://www.hairrestorationnetwork.com/eve/174503-my-hair-loss-story-2000-grafts-dr-farjo-6000-grafts-dr-hasson-4years-post-op.html

     

    there you go mate, this link should work, it’s all been FUT. haven’t had FUE

×
×
  • Create New...