Jump to content

RecedingTide

Senior Member
  • Posts

    142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RecedingTide

  1. I really hope you get the result you're looking for Sean. Often when people are Norwood 2 they envision getting back their pre hair loss hairline. I understand that feeling well. As one loses more hair the expectation changes and 3000 grafts in the frontal third can leave a lot of people happy.

     

    If I am honest I actually think the hairline design Dr. Rahal came up with was quite aggressive. I do not understand the large forehead comments. I would be more concerned about the donor recovery than the hairline height. While I understand you are chasing a dense hairline going too dense can impact yield. Suffice to say I cannot know why results have been sub optimal but you need to consider the next step very carefully. You have used 4500ish grafts in an area significantly smaller than the frontal third. Perhaps more like the frontal quarter of your scalp.

     

    I am urging you to please consider the ramifications of losing the hair behind it as you do have some thinning in the crown. Medications do not work forever and the only way to put hair permanently on your head is transplantation so you need to consider having enough in reserve to take care of the frontal half.

     

    I wish you all the very best on your journey Sean. Fingers crossed for you.

  2. Very nice result Dr. Erdogan. I see his donor capacity was estimated at 7900 fu preop. With uniform density of 60fu/cm2 I can only surmise that you feel it is possible to extract well over 40% of this patient's donor. I know there is one doctor in particular that believes we can take up to 50% of the donor via FUE. It would be interesting to hear a little about your philosophy on managing the donor area with FUE in the long term.

  3. Looks like a cracking result from the first op. I was wondering if the irritated area in the hairline also had worse crusting than the rest of the recipient? I have heard different approaches to removing crusts with many post-op protocols advising gently wetting and massaging to loosen them from day 8 or 9. I find this interesting as some will say it's paramount to massage off crusts to avoid infection while other doctors advocate a less active approach due to concern that grafts could be pulled out with the crusts. I'm inclined to believe that any hairs lost in crusts from day 8 will likely regrow given no blood appears. I am aware of Dr. Bernstein's plucking study.

     

    What I am basically asking is why and how do crusts affect growth?

  4. 50% is too much I agree, unless we're talking about an untouched donor of uniform 100FU/cm2. In most non curly haired Caucasians you can take a third of their donor via FUE. I can guarantee that there are patients walking around with almost 3.5k FUE transplanted with a uniform density of 86% of their preop donor density left. 8k for 33% of their donor no problem for many Europeans, particularly Spanish, Portugese and Italian.

  5. I once thought it was legit too and yeah the small study probably is honest. In practice though Gho is doing something else. Where are these results? He's transecting hairs in practice without regeneration. The study was just a means of promoting his clinic as something it's not. I have yet to see a recipient after multiple sessions that can compare to a 4000 graft fut.

×
×
  • Create New...