Senior Member rocketmas Posted November 20, 2003 Senior Member Share Posted November 20, 2003 Hi - A question for the veterans, I am Norwood 3A. Frontal density is around 20-40 hair per sq cm. That is, it generally looks full, but after a shower and when groomed looks quite thin and the scalp can be seen through. Also, I am Asian so probably have medium coarse hair. I am thinking a transplant (1500 -2K grafts ) which will add density to the frontal region and to the hairline. Questions: 1.) Since I have some density in the frontal region, some doctors tell me the shock loss will be high and could outweigh the benefits of a transplant. As I think on this, it implies that no one with existsing hair should be thinking of adding density because of significant shock loss ? 20-40 hair per sq cm is almost considered bald! Is there any good study on shock loss and how could it be reduced, what percentage is reversible. And at what existing density does it start making sense to add density? Other dosctors have told me not to worry about shock loss. All my opinions are from the top in the field Thanks, Sean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member rocketmas Posted November 20, 2003 Author Senior Member Share Posted November 20, 2003 Hi - A question for the veterans, I am Norwood 3A. Frontal density is around 20-40 hair per sq cm. That is, it generally looks full, but after a shower and when groomed looks quite thin and the scalp can be seen through. Also, I am Asian so probably have medium coarse hair. I am thinking a transplant (1500 -2K grafts ) which will add density to the frontal region and to the hairline. Questions: 1.) Since I have some density in the frontal region, some doctors tell me the shock loss will be high and could outweigh the benefits of a transplant. As I think on this, it implies that no one with existsing hair should be thinking of adding density because of significant shock loss ? 20-40 hair per sq cm is almost considered bald! Is there any good study on shock loss and how could it be reduced, what percentage is reversible. And at what existing density does it start making sense to add density? Other dosctors have told me not to worry about shock loss. All my opinions are from the top in the field Thanks, Sean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regular Member neverOld Posted November 20, 2003 Regular Member Share Posted November 20, 2003 I have had a HT in the temple, top and crown area of total 1684 grafts. I had approx same desity as you have, and experienced shock-loss. I guess - 10-20% less dense now than before the HT. Its is 4.5 months since the procedure, and I have no growth yet. I think its late, but most people say 2-6 months is normal. My TP-hairs fell out very late, so I should be in the restingphase still.. Normaly the majority of the shock lost-hairs will grow back, according to most doctors and poster on this forum, so I dont think it is any reason to go bold before you take some action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member tkotko Posted November 21, 2003 Senior Member Share Posted November 21, 2003 My situation seemed similar to yours - I went in for 1500 FU in the frontal region (ended up with 1900). Had some density in that region, except for the recession area, at least 30 - 40. I THINK I suffered a little shock loss, but it was hard to tell cause I also wore my hair shorter for awhile. Regardless, now at 7 mos, I have no effects of shock loss, or at least the gains have outweighed it. Also started taking Propecia about 3 mos prior to the procedure, might have helped. The past 2 months have been outstanding. My mother actually made a comment tonight, whom I've never told about having this done, but she asked if I was doing anything with my hair because it looked fuller. I told her "just wearing it longer I guess". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member NW Posted November 22, 2003 Senior Member Share Posted November 22, 2003 <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> My mother actually made a comment tonight, whom I've never told about having this done, but she asked if I was doing anything with my hair because it looked fuller. I told her "just wearing it longer I guess". Nice !!! "Yeah Mom, I cant believe that old bottle of Rogaine is finally kicking in !!!" Gosh after 6 years, finally something. Congrats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regular Member neverOld Posted December 9, 2003 Regular Member Share Posted December 9, 2003 And what do the first hairs look like? I am at 5 months 2 days today, still not a single hair popping out. My hair is so thin and so long so it will be very easy to see. N Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regular Member jetfan11 Posted November 20, 2013 Regular Member Share Posted November 20, 2013 I have had a HT in the temple, top and crown area of total 1684 grafts.I had approx same desity as you have, and experienced shock-loss. I guess - 10-20% less dense now than before the HT. Its is 4.5 months since the procedure, and I have no growth yet. I think its late, but most people say 2-6 months is normal. My TP-hairs fell out very late, so I should be in the restingphase still.. Normaly the majority of the shock lost-hairs will grow back, according to most doctors and poster on this forum, so I dont think it is any reason to go bold before you take some action. Did your shock loss grow back? In same situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now