Regular Member hairloser1 Posted October 7, 2009 Regular Member Share Posted October 7, 2009 It seems there used to be much more discussion about whether or not someone was a candidate for FUE. I guess there is a small test the Dr. can do to determine if your donor is such that it lends itself to safely removing grafts. I haven't seen any dicussion of this lately. I also haven't seen anyone post about how they had the test and were not a candidate so they couldn't get FUE. These days, it "seems" anyone who wants FUE just walks in and requests it and gets the procedure. Does anyone have any information or thoughts on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member Sparky Posted October 7, 2009 Senior Member Share Posted October 7, 2009 I think its just Dr Rassman that thinks some people literally cant have fue. I'm sure that the general consensus is that everyone can have this surgery. My Hairloss Website http://www.hairtransplantnetwork.com/blog/home-page.asp?WebID=2198 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill - Seemiller Posted October 7, 2009 Share Posted October 7, 2009 hairloser1, Many well respected hair transplant surgeons, including those who regularly perform realistic follicular unit extraction (FUE) procedures will tell you that not everyone is a candidate for this procedure. In my opinion, the development of newer and innovative tools have helped increase the number of patient candidates, but there is no such thing as 100% candidacy for a number of reasons. The truth is, not everyone is a candidate for hair transplant surgery altogether let alone a particular procedure. There are so many factors and things to consider...some of which include age, family history of hair loss, current and projected future hair loss pattern (area of baldness), donor characteristics (laxity and density), and whether or not the goals of the patient can realistically be met. Regarding FUE specifically, sometimes if a patient's scalp is too soft and malleable, penetration becomes a problem and the risk of follicular damage during extraction increases. I have heard of physicians turning down patients for FUE for this reason. Though there are varying opinions on this, I'm an avid believer that FUE is better reserved for qualified patients with minimal loss and minmial risks for progressing to advanced stages of hair loss. There are a number of reasons for this. To date, FUE is still more expensive (though costs have been coming down overall). More importantly, most leading hair restoration physicians will argue that on average there is less available donor hair via FUE than via follicular unit hair transplantation (FUT) via microscopic dissection. Thus, often times for men with advanced baldness to achieve the kind of results they want, they end up getting a strip procedure performed once they have no more available donor hair via FUE. Since most patients who are interested in FUE opt for this procedure to avoid the linear scar, this is self-defeating. Assuming you are a candidate for a hair transplant, when selecting a hair transplant procedure, it's highly important to think about what you ultimately want to accomplish long term. Immediate gratification just isn't possible with a hair transplant especially since at minimum, patients have to wait a full year assuming they only need one procedure in their life. Thus, be sure to consider all of your options before making any decisions. Best wishes, Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now