PerfectFew

I am objective. This site is not. Pat gets paid to promote doctors and tells people it is "patient-advocacy". That is nothing short of false advertising. I just want people to know the truth. Now they are seeing it, and it will no doubt be good for their health.

Deflection.

Anwser the question please!

I have spent only $10,000 and got great results from my doctor. I am satisfied by my doctor's ethical practices and the fact that he did not deceive me. I received biased opinions from Pat and other's (who I suspect are his friends or paid employees) on this web site.

Still no answer.

I am a patient advocate. Not a "shill". I am not selling anything nor am I "peddling". You are the shill: 941 posts so far!

Deflection by a shill.

Nope, just the shills: 939 posts by you. How much are you being paid?

Bill: 2930 posts Mrjb: 937 posts jotronic: 999 posts (employed by Hasson and Wong!!!) Does anyone see the link?

Bill: 2930 posts Mrjb: 937 posts jotronic: 999 posts (employed by Hasson and Wong!!!) Does anyone see the link?

Bill, I am still waiting for you to apologize for lying in the other community. I know that you, jotronic and Pat have all met. You are nothing more than a shill for this community.

Thanks for deflecting from the truth! You are a PAID SHILL, nothing more, nothing less. Your jig is up. You have been discovered. Why don't you just COME CLEAN. Perhaps you might have a chance and recovering.

Pat, How many doctors to you "recommend" that have not paid your fees? Thanks!

Pat, How many doctors to you "recommend" that have not paid your fees? Thanks!

$624,000 is specific. Promoting doctors for a fee is specific. Telling people this he is a patient advocate is specific.

Just like my doctor, who is well respected the "recommended" physicians on this community. He did an excellent job and has never been noted as being substandard by a patient. Note that (with the exception of Pat's bogus advice to me) I received great advice to see my doctor, and I am grateful I took their advice. Why not just call Dr. Bobby Limmer (the inventor of the follicular hair transplant)? He will tell you the real truth.

"Dude", PAT POSTS IN THESE FORUMS AND RECOMMENDS PHYSICIANS BASED UPON BEING PAID A FEE!!! Because they use the same tactics that Pat uses.

I am educating everyone to the fact that Pat gets paid to promote doctors and says he is a "patient advocate". It is a conflict of interest in the worst way, and is probably illegal. No doubt that when the investigation is finished, you people will see the cold hard truth.

Thank you for the link. When I actually become angry, I might use that. For now, I am being a real patient advocate by exposing the TRUTH. I am not angry. I am quite disgusted with your deceipt. There is a big difference. Why not just stop dodging the truth and post the real figures? Why not just come out and say it for real? Stop trying to deflect the real facts!

Thank you for your opinion. I also make a good living. So do many of the fine doctors listed here and on http://www.hairlossdoctorlist.com It is fine to make an HONEST income. I believe it is unethical to make recommendations based upon fees. That is the fundamental difference.

Youngsuccess: Why don't you just find out for yourself: Call any one of these fine doctors and ask them why they have to advertise here? They will tell you the REAL TRUTH!

youngsuccess: Thank you for your kind words. Certainly there is value to a patient-driven community. I just want what any patient wants (I am a happy patient), TRUTH IN ADVERTISING.

Definitions of charlatan on the Web (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Acharlatan): (char?·la?·tan) (shahr??l[schwa]-t[schwa]n) [Fr.] a pretender to knowledge or skills that he does not possess; in medicine, a quack. mountebank: a flamboyant deceiver; one who attracts customers with tricks or jokes wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn A charlatan is a person practicing quackery or some similar confidence trick in order to obtain money or advantage by false pretenses. If the ascription is false, then "charlatan" is pejorative; if it is true, then the description "charlatan" is no libel. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlatan

Definitions of charlatan on the Web (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Acharlatan): (char?·la?·tan) (shahr??l[schwa]-t[schwa]n) [Fr.] a pretender to knowledge or skills that he does not possess; in medicine, a quack. mountebank: a flamboyant deceiver; one who attracts customers with tricks or jokes wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn A charlatan is a person practicing quackery or some similar confidence trick in order to obtain money or advantage by false pretenses. If the ascription is false, then "charlatan" is pejorative; if it is true, then the description "charlatan" is no libel. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlatan

That is exactly what they are doing. It is common knowledge among the respectable HT physicians that this site is extorting honest physicians. A revolution is happening. Very soon, when Pat's money dries up because the physicians no longer support him. This site will become irrelevant. By the way, I heard once that when someone doesn't agree with the facts of an argument, they resort to name calling and using cuss words. Is this true?