Thanks for linking me to their library and your podcast I think I have actually dug pretty deep and gone through all the studies. Unfortunately the 4 studies are of topcical Fin and I have yet to find any on topical Dut, seems like they havn't relased them yet and not sure if Xyon Experience team would provice on request.
Havimg to make the decision whehter to choose the topical fin, or choose topical dut instead, i can't just make the blind assunptiom that topical Dut indeed works better than topical Fin. It seems intuitve that topical dut SHOULD work better and I should go for it asap, since it inhibits type 1+ type 2 5ar and oral verison cut dht by higher amount and oral dut version is also proven to be stronger than oral fin in the literature.
But I cant say for sure for topical dut > topical fin in terms of efficacy as there seems to be not enougb literature out there. Though it has a large molecular size(>500 Dalton's Rule) so it probably won' t get into your bloodstram, downside is it is unclear whether ebough would get into hair folicile to signfiicanr extent/ loeer dht in the tissue (explained by a Doctor of Pharmacy around 4:00
Thus I probably would like to see more data on the fact that topical dut really has a better outcome compared to topical fin perhaps on haircount (oh btw none of the studies relaeased by Hasson on topical fin actually compares the clinical outcome and supports his statement that the topical fin works as well as oral fin though there are studies stating so from others but they are not perfect either I won't go into too much details here) or at least data that it lowers scalp DHT by a larger amount than Finasteride or at least (not rigorous at all but bette than nothing) some comment on clinical observations that topical dut > topical fin like how Dr Hasson mentioned that topical fin seemed to work at least as well as oral fin and has even better efficacy somehow in the frontal area.
Oh and more data about Xyon topical Dut's bloodstream absorptiom and reduction in blood dht is probably improtsnt too, as I don't want too much of that in ny system if not any. it seems logicsl that Dut seems to be causing more side effects than Fin (thoigh doctors argue that they have same side effect profile as fin). Even for oral Fin it seems that besides the reversible sides, there could be long term clinical or subclinical negstive effects for taking it (eg paper by Traish but won'tcite too much here), not to mention the really really rare PFS, so it would seem prudent to make sure that not much Dut really gets into the blood. I am not sure I would be comfortable enoigh to take oral Dut at this stage either to put it in perspective though I admit I havnt done enough research on oral Dut.