Jump to content

rev3

Senior Member
  • Posts

    126
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rev3

  1. xlent design!

     

    even at 4 months

     

    you must be stoked!

     

    you've made wise decisions re: your hairline transplant

    and compared to other hairline transplants i have seen

    yours has made a significant difference in the framing of your face

     

    totally worth it and made me make the leap as well

  2. yeah, you can't tell the native from the transplant but like you said the transplant was within the native

    so you did not have shock loss which puts you ahead of the game

     

    the initial transplant even though within native hair looked extremely clean as well

     

    i think your transplant has a bright future

     

    doesn't look like anything was even done and that is saying a lot at 3 months

    congrats

  3. please ask for proposed density that they can try to achieve

    in cm2 at the hairline

     

    i only say this because as you say:

     

     

    my goal is to obtain a thick (natural, of course) hairline .

     

    and you want to be aware what your doctor considers THICK compared to what you consider thick, so you are not disappointed, waiting for your "THICK" while the dr., with all good intentions, transplanted his THICK

     

    just ask for the proposed density per cm2 at the hairline

  4. he has posted pics in the past and he was transplanting into totally balding areas at the temple angle and temple point

     

    post op

     

    the temple angles look evenly diffuse, which is more obvious due to the density of the native hair behind the recipient area

     

    while the temple points look patchy

  5. at this point, the good news is that this is not a disaster

     

    maybe 1000 grafts was too conservative to give the density you wanted in the area transplanted

    might be the reason for you disappointment;

    (do you know/can you find out the recipient area in cm2?)

     

    for instance, a recipient area greater than 16cm2 for the 1000 grafts you received (given the density of the hair sitting directly behind the proposed new hair line) will give a density of less than 60 grafts per cm2.

    in the temple angles this will probably look like thinning (as it does)

     

    maybe the FUE procedure, which, in general, is known to give lesser yield than FUT, reduced that 1000 grafts to 900 (they say the yield is 10% less with FUE)

     

    if that is the case and everyone of those 900 grafts grew out,

    your recipient area would need to be 15cm2 or lower to reach a density of at least 60 grafts per cm2

     

    find out these numbers

    they will relieve your "waiting" for growth when all might have grown already

     

    look, numbers mean nothing if you are satisfied

    but if you are questioning whether the procedure failed to grow fully or if it was just a case of not placing enough grafts to satisfy the density you expected,

    these numbers (recipient area in cm2 and number of grafts transplanted) will clear this up

     

    what ever the case, this is an easy case to BEEF up the density

    with another procedure (i know you've heard this before but at this stage, this is a good plan that you can be proactive about now by consulting with other docs or planning with your current one)

     

    best

  6. at this point, the good news is that this is not a disaster

     

    maybe 1000 grafts was too conservative to give the density you wanted in the area transplanted

    might be the reason for you disappointment;

    (do you know/can you find out the recipient area in cm2?)

     

    for instance, a recipient area greater than 16cm2 for the 1000 grafts you received (given the density of the hair sitting directly behind the proposed new hair line) will give a density of less than 60 grafts per cm2.

    in the temple angles this will probably look like thinning (as it does)

     

    maybe the FUE procedure, which, in general, is known to give lesser yield than FUT, reduced that 1000 grafts to 900 (they say the yield is 10% less with FUE)

     

    if that is the case and everyone of those 900 grafts grew out,

    your recipient area would need to be 15cm2 or lower to reach a density of at least 60 grafts per cm2

     

    find out these numbers

    they will relieve your "waiting" for growth when all might have grown already

     

    look, numbers mean nothing if you are satisfied

    but if you are questioning whether the procedure failed to grow fully or if it was just a case of not placing enough grafts to satisfy the density you expected,

    these numbers (recipient area in cm2 and number of grafts transplanted) will clear this up

     

    what ever the case, this is an easy case to BEEF up the density

    with another procedure (i know you've heard this before but at this stage, this is a good plan that you can be proactive about now by consulting with other docs or planning with your current one)

     

    best

×
×
  • Create New...