Senior Member mr_peanutbutter Posted September 11, 2023 Senior Member Share Posted September 11, 2023 interesting question i found on reddit: „imagine the following scenario guy a is 25, norwood 2. he is destinied to be norwood 10 years later with 35 if he doesnt intervent medical. luckily for him he starts finasterid and stops his hairloss. with 35 he is still norwood 2 and not norwood 5 like it was his genetic destiny. for some reasons he stops finasteride at that age. what will happen: 1) he starts receeding again but with the speed he had before he took fin. it needs another 10 years to give him a norwood 5 or 2)His hairloss catches up and he becomes norwood 5 within 6-12 months“ What is your thoughts on this? would this guy really go from norwood 2 to norwood 5 within 6 months? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regular Member hairywannabe Posted September 11, 2023 Regular Member Share Posted September 11, 2023 Since we don't know an exact mechanism of loosing hair there is no straighforward answer. We can probably assume that you body has periods in which your hair loss is more and less agressive. So if after those 10 years his hair loss is not more agressive (than it was before taking meds) then I think his hair loss won't catch up that fast as you described. On the other hand, after those 10 yeas his hair loss might be more aggressive and then the outcomes would be different. I think we should think about it as non regular process that is really hard to predict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regular Member BackFromTheBrink Posted September 11, 2023 Regular Member Share Posted September 11, 2023 (edited) What's not clear to me is whether hair becomes more succeptible to DHT as we age or whether it's the long term exposure to DHT that results in miniturisation. If it's succeptibility that changes you imagine the now fragile grafts would deteriorate quietly as DHT levels rise after the medication was stopped. If it's long term exposure, then you'd have effectively stopped the clock (or at least slowed it down). We know that testosterone and therefore DHT lowers as we age, so the profile will be different regardless of the mechanism. Edited September 11, 2023 by BackFromTheBrink Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member mr_peanutbutter Posted September 11, 2023 Author Senior Member Share Posted September 11, 2023 i think hair that regrowth under fin probably disappear quickly once you stop but why would hair that wasnt damaged before disappear so quickly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member mr_peanutbutter Posted December 3, 2023 Author Senior Member Share Posted December 3, 2023 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member BaldDude Posted December 3, 2023 Senior Member Share Posted December 3, 2023 Testosterone and DHT decline with age but it seems hair follicles become more sensitive to DHT with age so we're screwed either way. This explains why some men don't have much hair loss until they reach their 50-70s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member mr_peanutbutter Posted January 13 Author Senior Member Share Posted January 13 On 9/11/2023 at 11:47 AM, mr_peanutbutter said: interesting question i found on reddit: „imagine the following scenario guy a is 25, norwood 2. he is destinied to be norwood 10 years later with 35 if he doesnt intervent medical. luckily for him he starts finasterid and stops his hairloss. with 35 he is still norwood 2 and not norwood 5 like it was his genetic destiny. for some reasons he stops finasteride at that age. what will happen: 1) he starts receeding again but with the speed he had before he took fin. it needs another 10 years to give him a norwood 5 or 2)His hairloss catches up and he becomes norwood 5 within 6-12 months“ What is your thoughts on this? would this guy really go from norwood 2 to norwood 5 within 6 months? https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJM199909233411307 found this on reddit unfortunately i dont have access to the full study and it seems it limited to 24 months my interpretation: - the fin gainz gained in 12 months are lost in 12 months (expected) - compared to the controll group (no fin at all) after 12 months the group which first took fin and then discontinued still has a higher haircount after 12 months of discontinuation however the difference is very slight and the difference in the sloop of the declinecurve is quiet different in both groups. the one in the controll group is flatter while the other one is steep. if there wont be any changes the curves would meet very soon tbh id have expected that the sloops lf both curves will become equal and parallel once the fin gainz in haircount got lost, but it doesnt appear to the case even though it cant be told for sure since the watched time frame isnt big enough however that would be really a bummer if finasteride catch up not only mean that you will lose you new gained hair but also lose the hairs that you would have lost if you havent taken fin at all. as if your body had memory function that would tell your body hpw much hair you are supposed to have ps: havent watched this but noted for later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now