Jump to content

Keene surgery done in 1994


Recommended Posts

  • Senior Member

I just wanted to post this result, even though it is from when Dr. Keene first started doing hair restoration surgery, because I was reading the posts on how some patients feel it is not ethical that doctors ever did the really unnatural plugs, and how the technology has not changed, just it's use. We completely agree that the technology was there to do natural transplants long before it was adopted by many clinics! These photos are before and 15 months after of a patient Dr. Keene restored in 1994, with around 700 grafts. His result is completely natural, at a time when plugs were still common.

 

The doctors who pioneered micro grafting techniques, now called follicular unit grafting, years before many others, worked very hard to bring the technique to the forefront. They helped to train other doctors in the technique, and have refined the technique even more over the years, so today's patients can find doctors who offer a procedure with a completely natural result. Some patients were even able to do that in the early 90's, as you can see from this result.

776105785_CB851DB647DE0D8769DCDC8B6B0D2AD6.jpg

876105785_DF2357247C1919D00893F4891341FC36.jpg

976105785_661E81417AC7F4B6D3A0AA3E9ACBA8AD.jpg

186105785_C6521D82376469138748603E539DBA0D.jpg

286105785_F8E45CAE89C25F00D67C49EC46491B6B.jpg

I am a medical assistant and hair transplant surgical assistant employed by Dr. Keene

 

Dr. Keene is a member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Senior Member

An excellent result for sure. Thanks for sharing.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

11/04-07 - 800-1600 ish grafts - danish clinic - poor results

 

12/02-08 - 2764 grafts - Dr. Devroye - good result but needs hairline density

 

03/12-10 - 1429 grafts - Dr. Mohmand - result pending

 

Feel free to visit my picture thread

 

My Hair Transplant Photos - Surgery with Dr. Devroye

 

Young lads below 25 unite!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Senior Member

This is obviously a very impressive result. I have a tough time understanding that only 700 grafts were used to cover a pretty large area. Seems like from my research many docs would recommend something like 2500-3000 grafts. Perhaps I am wrong, but can someone explain this, please?

 

This is a 700 graft one pass result..?

 

Looks great!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...