Senior Member PLEASE GROW PLEASE Posted July 8, 2007 Senior Member Share Posted July 8, 2007 I looked at alot of before and afters ,and the one thing I noticed is that the guys that had a nice amount early growth [3 months] seemed to have the most stunning results. Any of you guys believe there is something to this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member PLEASE GROW PLEASE Posted July 8, 2007 Author Senior Member Share Posted July 8, 2007 I looked at alot of before and afters ,and the one thing I noticed is that the guys that had a nice amount early growth [3 months] seemed to have the most stunning results. Any of you guys believe there is something to this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member MrJobi Posted July 8, 2007 Senior Member Share Posted July 8, 2007 Hi I don't think so. What I would say is many who get largest sessions show the most marked early results due to graft count. With this in mind, naturally they have the best long term results that would be my point of view. JOBI 1417 FUT - Dr. True 1476 FUT - Dr. True 2124 FUT - Dr. True 604 FUE - Dr. True My views are based on my personal experiences, research and objective observations. I am not a doctor. Total - 5621 FU's uncut! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill - Seemiller Posted July 8, 2007 Share Posted July 8, 2007 I agree with JOBI. The end result is not related to early or late growth. I have seen hundreds of before/after pictures at this point, many of them have been impressive, some not so impressive - but as Jobi said, the larger sessions will tend to show the more dramatic results. Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now