Senior Member mrkneed Posted September 25, 2007 Senior Member Share Posted September 25, 2007 I hear that the basic formula is 1,000 x your norwood# = number of grafts required. However I see people who are say a norwood 6 and they get only 2,000 grafts and the results are amazing. So my question is doesnt hair density play a huge role in what the required grafts needed would be? I am a norwood 4 and had 2500 grafts and at month 4 I am impressed with the results so far - the doctor told me I have very dense hair. Thanks. My Hair Loss Website - Hair Transplant with Dr. Keene Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member mrkneed Posted September 25, 2007 Author Senior Member Share Posted September 25, 2007 I hear that the basic formula is 1,000 x your norwood# = number of grafts required. However I see people who are say a norwood 6 and they get only 2,000 grafts and the results are amazing. So my question is doesnt hair density play a huge role in what the required grafts needed would be? I am a norwood 4 and had 2500 grafts and at month 4 I am impressed with the results so far - the doctor told me I have very dense hair. Thanks. My Hair Loss Website - Hair Transplant with Dr. Keene Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member calvinmd Posted September 25, 2007 Senior Member Share Posted September 25, 2007 So much depends on what you expect from the work. Hair characteristics do have a lot to do with it, and so do the groupings of the grafts. Of course 1&2-hair grafts are only half as effective as 3&4-hair grafts in terms of raw density gains. I personally want an honest no-MPB appearance at least in the frontal transplanted area, and I think even the "1000 grafts for each NW level" is probably not high enough for my expectations. ------------------------------------------------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member TheHairLossCure Posted September 25, 2007 Senior Member Share Posted September 25, 2007 You cannot multiply your Norwood class by 1,000 and get an appropriate number of grafts. This neglects issues like hair characteristics and patient expectations. I think 1,000 grafts for a Norwood I make no sense, nor does 2,000 grafts for a Norwood II. These patterns are not identified as hair loss patterns. 3,000 for a Norwood III? Maybe. But are we talking about a III, IIIa, or IIIv? It makes a big difference. See my point? You referenced a Norwood VI getting a dramatic result with 2,000 grafts. It is totally possible if the grafts are used to build up a hairline/facial frame in bald area. This approach neglects the crown area, but the result from the front can be dramatic regardless. Your case ??“ 2,500 grafts on a class IV ??“ sounds reasonable. More importantly you are pleased! Your density will impact the coverage IF your doc was refering to hairs/follicular unit. Notice: I am an employee of Dr. Paul Rose who is recommended on this community. I am not a doctor. My opinions are not necessarily those of Dr. Rose. My advice is not medical advice. Dr. Rose is a member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill - Seemiller Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Thehairlosscure, I agree and disagree. I believe hair characteristics and patient expectations play a huge role in determining the number of grafts needed - however, multiplying one's NW level by 1000 (or what I say is 1000-1500) can be used as a guide. One can also use our animated graft calculator as a nother guide in helping determine an approximate number of grafts. I believe that "guide" and "approximate" are the two key words here that make this worth discussing. Clearly nobody can say that this is a hard fast rule. Mrkneed, When you are referring to "dense" hair, do you mean "thick" hair? Density often refers to the number of grafts per square CM where hair thickness typically refers the diameter of the hair shaft. Clearly 2500 really thick hairs will appear much denser than 2500 thin ones - even though the density will be the same. Best wishes, Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member notgoing2gobald Posted September 25, 2007 Senior Member Share Posted September 25, 2007 mrkneed: who was your doc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member TheHairLossCure Posted September 25, 2007 Senior Member Share Posted September 25, 2007 Bill, "Guide" and "approximate" are the two key words, indeed! IMO The system does work better with range you suggest (1000-1500) - for classes III, IV, V, and VI in particular. Notice: I am an employee of Dr. Paul Rose who is recommended on this community. I am not a doctor. My opinions are not necessarily those of Dr. Rose. My advice is not medical advice. Dr. Rose is a member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senior Member mrkneed Posted September 25, 2007 Author Senior Member Share Posted September 25, 2007 Bill, my doctor said my hair was very dense so I believe he meant hairs per sq cm - I also have pretty thick hair which is what I originally thought he meant. My Surgeon was Dr. Distefano in Mass. My Hair Loss Website - Hair Transplant with Dr. Keene Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now