doc

what is the difference. is doc praising this clinic,,, no. Does he make a reasonable point in what he is saying and is it logical,,, yes. Why are the few people responding ,so animately defending rodfl, yet refuse to see the logic that doc has discussed. wonder who you guys are.sounds more like you guys have a special interest here. The point ive made in this forum tonight would be no different whether i am the doc, his patient , his janitor or a stranger. i am not praising his work or discussing anything other than the irresponsibility and carelessness that can go on in a forum that is not properly censored. too many characters out their that get off on slamming others, i cant stand it and frankly dont think i will waist much more time with this.

do not accuse Dr Rose of making any statements about any other physician. It is obvious that whoever rodfl is, having had 4 different docs in the past(as stated in his profile),and obviously not happy with any of them since he is seeking his 5th or 6th doc, is the one making the accusations. how would any doc blame a certain scar or donor area on one of 4 or 5 docs. what about the other docs that operated on this person? So, refer to your definition now cowboy! Also, is it not logical that a patient with the story he wrote on this public forum is indeed looking for repair work as he himself described his donor area as a butchered up job? i agree with you that not every one has the same experience at the same clinic. but this is an obvious slam on the doc mentioned. i believe it ok to constructively criticize any clinic, but putting blame on a certain doc and using another docs name in casting the blame is wrong and definately nearing slander. granted, no one can legally accuse rodfl due to the fact that his true identity is not revealed. i believe that rodfl should reveal that he wss not happy with tha attention he received from his last doc and was left unsatisfied. i dont believe this very respectable site should be used to slam highly regarded docs. Finally, please research low level laser therapy and make educated comments in the future, you are in fact wasting readers time with ignorant views on a science that is becoming more valued by the docs of this forum every day. i dont mean to defend any doc or clinic, but was only commenting on the obvious attack in this case

to clarify, dr rose should be informed that his own name was used and that he was probably wrongfully quoted. it was not meant that dr rose used anyones name wrongfully. dr rose is a great surgeon and person and would probably not agree to the way his own name was used. any way, i think this topic has become tiresome, so ill go away for now. by the way, i am not an employee of the clinic mentioned,, what i mentioned before is highly probable as to what may have actually taken place. hope everyone takes everything they read in any forum with a grain of salt.

HI B SPOT, GLAD TO SEE YOU CHOSE DR SHAPIRO. IS IS ONE OF THE BEST. YOU WILLDEFINATELY BE HAPPY. NO NAMES WERE MENTIONED IN THE PREVIOUS POST. NO PRIVACY WAS BREACHED. DIDNT MEAN TO UPSET YOU, JUST HATE THAT PEOPLE WOULD GO OUT OF THEIR WAY TO MAKE SUCH NEGATIVE COMMENTS. IF U ONLY KNEW THE TYPE OF CARE THAT TAKES PLACE AT THE CLINIC MENTIONED, U TOO WOULD BE UPSET.

to clarify, dr markou only uses co2 laser to correct cobblestone effect of old larger grafts. he uses it in some cases on the top layer of skin on rough surfaces for a smoother look. he does not make hole with it! he also offer low level laser light therapy with or without surgery. post op it is used for faster healing. he charges no extra for this. he published research in a peer review medical journal in 2003 and the fda recently cleared this for use in the us. THERE IS NO GIMMICK INVOLVED IN LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY . IT IS NOW AS LEGITIMATE AN OPTION FOR HAIR REPLACEMENT AS PROPECIA, ROGAINE AND SURGERY.

the comment made by rodfl on dr markou is slanderous and grossly inaccurate. first of all , it is doubtfull that dr rose would in any way slander dr markou as is mentioned. when this patient presented to dr markou, he was there for repair work. his donor site was already a mess. he was told that the stretch mark would probably re occur as dr rose told him. comments like this should be screened for possible slander. the person who posted this willbe receiving a letter of demand to remove dr markous name from any slanderous remarks that are printed. this is a serious matter , when people can at will slander others with out proper recourse. dr rose will also be informed of the improper use of his name in this matter.