I’m planning to grow my hair out again. I’ve just kept it short because I felt the hairline recession is more noticeable when it’s long, but I’m letting it grown now so the surgeon can see an accurate future snap shot and can plant grafts accordingly.
I do agree the FUT scar could be noticeable at this length. I do think FUT has its advantages though. For example in my case, since I have retrograde alopecia on the sides it reduces the density, and also the“safe” area of the donor zone. So if I did FUE there’s a much smaller area, and amount of grafts to pull from before risking the donor looking over-harvested. Another thing to consider is generally (from my understanding), doing FUT first increases the maximum number of grafts you can extract from the donor. One study suggests that number can be as high as an extra 2500 grafts. For some people a number that high is a whole separate transplant.
And medically speaking, the strip scars of today have gotten much smaller. So while I do understand people not wanting a big ugly scar on the back of their head, I think it might not be as bad as they imagined, and does have some pro’s. I was one of those people myself until I started researching and looking at peoples results with FUT. and after all FUE is not scarless, and depending on how short the hair is and how many grafts are taken, would also be noticeable.
Overall I think FUE and FUT both have advantages and disadvantages, but it’s up to the individual and their specific case for them to decide which works best.