pc

edit..REALLY nice

put a big old smile on my face. thanx

I get a kick out of him. I think pat should just edit the posts...something like; "hello, I am a rip off artist that tries to sell you the most assinine stuff and I tell you it grows hair." if you see me or my website, please give me money...when you do that, I will send you stuff like ben gay and call it something very hair growing and official sounding... I'll tell you to give it some time so you don't get mad at me for 6 or seven months. then I'll go and buy myself cool stuff with your money...this is a very good idea and everyone should participate...if everyone participates, I will get like a house and a nice car too" pat could probably get real some good digs in, ban the account so this idiot couldn't edit it, and we should leave it up and not even lock the thread. I don't think he'd post too many times after he sees us having fun at his expense

this is a yes and a no answer. if you live in the new york area, we'll meet and see what could be done I used to wear just a quarter of an inch of what's called "lace" in front of the rest of my real hair. this does give a natural hairline, but the lace needs to be no less then a certain density...so, the density behind the lace needs to be at least as dense, otherwise it won't look right...so you might not be a candidate even though it's done. in addition, it takes some practice putting this hairline on and making it look good, since there is no firm body to it. the best way to make the lace for best appearance, you need to insist on unprocessed hair, which is more comonly known as "european" hair., plus, for best appearance, it needs to be made with what's called "bleached knots"...the hair is bleached on the bottom before the knot is tied...hair direction should be staight forward...most techs like to knot the hair in the direction of the style, but this is incorrect. the knot will shift over time regardless, but it should start out direction forward. there are also differant types of "blend" which is used in the front to get a more whispy appearance. then the method of securing the lace is an issue. we had that issue solved, but I would need to meet with you to show you how to do it, and again, it would take practice so, long story short, without someone who's done it before to spend time with you, getting the lace prepared, and then showing how to apply it, it's probably not going to happen.

telephone man, that is excellant stuff...what clinic did this work? how many, how old are you...all that. great pics!

I've been out of the bussiness for a while, and I don't know who's having them made right. there are a few "tricks" we use in the entertainment industry that gives an undetectable hairline...this goes much further then the "lace front". as I say, it's impopssible to tell a great hairpeice from a hair transplant

there is no way you can tell a great hairpeice from a hair transplant I used to own a replacement center, and I could even take my clients to get a haircut, and the hair dresser wouldn't know until a later point in his hair cut...we did this for our commercial, and it was live and unrehearsed...the salon allowed hidden cameras and it was un rehearsed. we even showed the point where he finally discovered the hair peice. that's why it's amazing to me to see some of the helmits on some of the actors today. the cost of one of these "systems" is not too much more then a standard hairpeice either

a VERY nice read. thanx

ya, it's been slowing down tons, thought today is better then it's been alot I think might be the forum software.

again, and obviously; nobody could possibly see a legal or financial risk to telling the truth. sorry as far as stepping up to the plate and doing it myself, I clearly have, and there is no financial risk what so ever. statements like yours is nothing more then a convenience which gives some kind of license to withold information that's obviously important to patients in this community good night skywalker

rediculous post making a convenient excuse when there is none to be had there is no liability when you speak about the truth...you'd need protection only if you wanted to lie or decieve. who doesn't know this?...rather, who makes believe they don't know this? no legal agreement needs to be drawn sorry. but it is convenient to say something like that, that's for sure talk is cheap this is true, attacks are easy to level...this is true too. as far as I'm concerned, petermac said it all when he said; I would have preferred he was more specific, but he wasn't. time to retire from this thread.

not fair...I'd never answer a question yes or no if I thought yes or no was not good enough...I answer questions with my own answers, not the answers of the questioner...I think petermac probably feels the same if he wants to answer any of these questions he'll answer them with his own answers not ours he just told us he didn't post it and doesn't know who did...he also expressed his contempt about the person that made the post as far as his involvment or lack of involvent with the body of the email; the email is fact finding, it doesn't matter one stitch if he was involved with the body of the fact finding email...the fact finding email would be sent no matter it was dhi or any other transplant organization, and there can be no fault with any company simpy becuase allegations are made in a fact finding correspondance all that matters is if after the fact finding was done, what his opinion is of the allegations dhi doesn't have any right to give petermac permission to discuss anything...this country gives him the permission to discuss it no matter what dhi has to say if there's a legal madate that prevents his free speech, he has to state that in no uncertain terms, otherwise any failure to disclose what he knows is just a matter pf personal convenience. personally, I think dhi should come in here to add to this conversation. that would be interesting indeed

most important though hairbethere; do you believe the allegation in the email are supportable

no matter who he worked for, no matter how sterile the procedures, anyone would have questions to ask if allegations are made by outside parties the outside parties might have an agenda, but if they raise a safety issue, an email of that sort is standard procedure allegations are common in competitive business. ' but are the allegations supportable...this is really all that matters (in my humble opinion) I agree that his involvment or non invovlment shouldn't be swept under the rug I have to agree that his answers were still plays on words...but I took his words to mean that dhi is vindicated of the allegations in his opinion. let's see if petermac wants to come back and have an ernest discussion answers more on point

I have a differant opinion; it doesn't matter to me one bit if petermac composed the email. all that matters is if the allegations in the email are supportable if they are, I'm glad the email was posted. if they are not, then I am appalled that the email was posted from the following; I think it's pretty clear petermac believes the contents are not supportable. I would have rather he made a statement either way, but for this quote I speculate.