FormerFutureKrillin

Sent you a PM

2 month update - no photos of the scar this time as all implanted hairs shed a little bit after my last update.

Here are some photos at 1 month post removal. Redness continues to fade and some hairs are growing back (I think there are less grafts still there than it looks in the photos). Some of the ridging/cobblestoning/skin damage from my previous surgery is definitely more evident in certain light conditions - as Dr. Bisanga wisely noted I am in agreement I will probably need some laser resurfacing and/or professional micro needling sessions to help with that, although in normal to bright light the bumpiness is harder to see. Front Scar:

My guess is that it is because in strip you can’t cherry-pick the right number of singles vs multis like FUE, so if your strip had too many 1 hair grafts you would need to combine some of them to make some multis or else it wouldn’t look as good. I’m not a doctor so I don’t really know 100% on either point but I agree intuitively it seems less than ideal from a survivability perspective.

This is confusing the issue - they are saying they often place two, separate, 1-hair grafts into a single channel to “create” a double (or perhaps a 1-hair graft with a 2-hair graft to make a triple etc.). So multiple grafts in one incision, which would mean two 1-hair grafts in a single incision would appear to the software as a single graft with 2 hairs. Thus, the software would be undercounting the total grafts that were extracted. The amount of undercounting would depend on how many grafts were combined this way. This is all the more reason the graft breakdown should be provided asap. The graft breakdown would likely go a long way in clearing this up, which is why it’s so odd it hasn’t been provided. The longer it isn’t provided, the more it seems like Dr. Bloxham just doesn’t have it. For what it’s worth, my graft breakdown from my surgery with Bloxham was also never provided to me, but in fairness, I didn’t ever ask. I would be interested to see if other Bloxham patients on the forum were ever provided with that information.

@bluebird00 the above is where you are off course mathematically. This is by no means a safe assumption as your methodology is not correct. No one has a completely homogenous donor, and you cannot extrapolate your average donor density from a single square centimeter measurement in the thickest part of your donor. It is extremely common for density to drop or vary around the occipital areas (above the ears) without any “visible patchiness”. As an anecdotal example, my donor density is ~30 FU/sq cm lower in certain areas of my donor than it is in the same area in my head that you measured! That is a crazy difference and I have no visible patchiness. It is only detectible by detailed measurements of my donor area at many points. A density difference throughout your donor could either explain or refute the stated graft count. There are plenty of doctors who can give a professional assessment of your donor density at different points. If you insist on taking the measurements yourself, at the very least you need to measure more than just 1 square cm and in more positions to arrive at a “safe” assumption of your average donor density. It will be very hard to do yourself and the more measurements taken the better, as the reality is your donor density likely gradually changes throughout different positions. You absolutely have legitimate questions and concerns that should be answered by the doctor, and in my personal opinion the official response here was not sufficient at all to address your legitimate concerns. There is indeed basic information still missing (e.g., what was your graft breakdown in 1s, 2s, 3s etc). But you are losing legitimacy by claiming strongly that you had over 5,000 grafts extracted based on the faulty assumption above. And just to nip this in the bud, literally no part of me wants to be defending this doctor (just check my post history…), but the point above stands.

Think he agreed an explanation from the doctor would clear this up. As was mentioned earlier, there should be a breakdown of the types of FUs (1s, 2s, 3s, 4s) easily available which would probably help put this to bed - its surprising that information hasn’t been provided to OP.

For what it’s worth, I was able to track down the reddit post you referenced earlier about the techs - that post described my experience to a T (right down to the painful last bit of the procedure). In hindsight, I have come to strongly suspect that the techs that were staffed on my surgery day were rushing to finish my surgery as fast as possible for whatever reason. My surgery was finished extremely quickly for its size (a tech even said as much as they went out the door when I was finished), which I think contributed to some of my issues. I still believe Dr. Bloxham is a good and ethical doctor. But there are more people involved in the surgery than just him, and he’s ultimately responsible for the team. From my research, I agree with the two posts above that my case appears to be an outlier in terms of the result, so I guess weight my opinion accordingly however you want. But in my opinion the mistakes that were made in my case were extremely egregious - mistakes that fly in the face of Bloxham’s own HT philosophy stated on his YouTube channel.

Haven’t put anything on the books yet for next steps, but I’ve heard usually between 8-12 weeks is the minimum spacing for removal sessions. I’m guessing there could be some variance in my case given I already had a lot of scarring on one side of hairline prior to the punches, but we will see. Assuming I need another round of punchouts (would agree that it seems probable, and was definitely prepared for that), I’d prefer to get it done as soon as I can feasibly get it done.

Here are some photos from Day 11 - scabs are gone from the implanted grafts. Redness is fading gradually from the area of removal. For anyone curious of the cosmetic effect of the removal of 306 grafts on my frontal line, I’ve posted some photos with my hair down below. IMO, no one other than me (or perhaps some people on this forum) would notice a cosmetic difference at this stage. This makes me feel very validated in my decision and my overall feelings about the prior surgery, and is a bit crazy to think about how so many grafts were essentially not accomplishing much cosmetically.

Today is Day 7 - here are some photos: Scar left side: Scar right side:

Thanks for the post and encouragement. I am sorry that you had to be in a similar situation, it certainly was not easy for me to make the decision to go down this path and I’m sure it was the same with you. Hope everything with the 2nd step goes well, and I’m sure it will given you went to Dr. Konior.

Sure - I’m now at Day 5. The redness is already fading and some remaining hairs are sprouting back through. I’ll try to get a pic of the scar grafts soon, for now it is a bit tricky as I have very long hair and don’t want to rip the grafts out or damage them manipulating my hair too much.

The bottom line is that Dr. Bisanga's assessment and strategy resonated with me and I trust him completely given my in person consultation, his previous results and his experience in repairs of this type. My feelings on my previous procedure, my concerns about a future surgery and a summary of my last interaction with Dr. Bloxham (and my feelings on that interaction) are well documented in my previous thread. Sorry if that feels like deflection, but I really don't want this thread to devolve into drama or mulling on the previous surgery. If you have specific questions feel free to PM me. As for FUE vs. FUT, that is just my personal choice having gone through the FUT recovery. At the time of my first surgery, I thought FUT was right for me given I was young in HT terms, had fairly progressed hair loss (nearly total loss in frontal third, crown starting to thin at young age) and one grandfather who was NW 7. However, being unable to lift weights/stay out of the gym took a large toll on my mental and physical health. I avoided weightlifting for nearly 5-6 months (longer than Dr. Bloxham's restriction of 10 days), and my scar still stretched / is very wide. I really did not want to go through that again if I could avoid it. I also felt another FUT carried a high risk of leaving the scar even wider.

Future surgery will be FUE - I am very, very, VERY lucky to have good donor density. This is an extremely fortunate break, as I think it’s fair to say the vast majority of repair patients also have depleted donor adding to the complication of the repair. My donor density means we’ll likely be able to do some temple point work in the repair surgery. Given how wide my scar ended up from one strip (could easily end up wider or stretch from more strips) and my personal recovery process generally, I wanted to avoid another FUT surgery unless my donor would not permit. I wanted the removed grafts placed in the strip scar because it meant less shaving for the surgery and also I would like to be able to go slightly lower on the buzzer. As you see, 306 grafts is not enough to fill the full scar. I may throw some more into it in the full surgery to help conceal it more.