valencia

There is number 4 flaw, or wrong proposition in that video. Dr.Feller's claim that when laser travels through the air retains (as he claims VIRTUALLY ) ALL its power Until strikes surface . That by the laws of physics is impossible . Atmosphere is 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, and 1% other gases. So how much power laser retains by the time it strikes surface depends upon how many molecules of nitrogen, oxygen and other gases collided with that laser BEFORE it struck a surface in aggregate form other than gas.

Dr.Feller about your video and rules made by YOU that you only read posts that address the video in the first two sentences. Why did you read the posts from PGP, and Thana? Because you wrote this.Quote " Greyhunk, Once again, your posts make no sense, and if I,PGP, and Thana can't follow them, I doubt others can either. " PGP and Thana did NOT address the video in their first two sentences. Dr.Feller why don't you stop as you said "the B.S" and stand behind YOUR words?

Ouotes made in regards to Dr.Feller's video ' Dr.Feller wrote: Valencia and Greyhunk, The video very clearly shows that ALL of the laser light is blocked by a standard Klenex tissue. Not a small portion of it as you claimed Greyhunk. You just made up your "small percentage" theory. GrayHunk wrote: Your long video at 3:17 has a portion of Kleenex (I suppose it is simple-ply) obstructing the laser. You can CLEARLY see a dimmed, weakened spot from the directed, concentrated laser light on your screen. Dr.Feller wrote: Greyhunk, Once again, your posts make no sense, and if I,PGP, and Thana can't follow them, I doubt others can either. The video demonstration and its signficance are self-explanatory, any comments to the contrary can only come from a person with either an irrational mind or an agenda Please grow Please wrote: I personally dont care about the video because I was convinced over and over a LONG LONG time ago these lasers are worthless. I didnt need an explanation . My eyes and ears are pretty smart.' I watched the video, and I CLEARLY see a dimmed, weakened spot from the directed, concentrated laser light even though was blocked by Kleenex. I conclude, from the VERY EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY FELLER'S VIDEO DEMONSTRATION that the 'lasser' penetrated the obstacle, and remained 'lasser' after passing through the obstacle.That video did not PROVE that LLLT laser is not a laser any more once it reaches an obstacle, that it disperses into red light only, and looses its properties.That video however proved the opposite, and showed Dr.Feller deliberately adjusting the tissue to deceive the viewers For disclosing identities as a condition one to be qualified to comment on video. That is something new. Such disclosure was not requested by Dr.Feller before . Why is asked from GrayHunk ONLY to post his identity on the web site? Why ALL other members are not asked the same? Why HTN does not post its address,its registration, number,the names of the owners? Why does Bill not post his identity and address,he comments on this video,does he not? If that is a condition Dr.Feller needs? Why Dr.Feller does not disclose his home address but asks that from members replying to his post? Why is he avoiding simple YES or NO answer from GreyHunk?

How about it? You claim to be "scientists" how about putting your reputations and your money on the line? I do it everyday, how about stepping up Greyhunk? Valencia? It's easy to smear and confuse when you have no accountability, lets cut out the B.S. factor and see you two come forward to stand accountable. How about it? Any takers? I am a lady Dr.Feller,I am also blonde...I will have to back up.Because I like you. You are handsome. I declare amnesty I don't know about this big HUNK person...i don't think he will Bye bye.

I also agree that one can not claim scientific proof with using flawed logic. according to the dominant understanding among logicians, the validity or invalidity of an argument is determined entirely by its logical form. The logical form of an argument is that which remains of it when one abstracts away from the specific content of the premises and the conclusion, i.e., words naming things, their properties and relations, leaving only those elements that are common to discourse and reasoning about any subject matter, i.e., words such as "all", "and", "not", "some", etc. One can represent the logical form of an argument by replacing the specific content words with letters used as place-holders or variables.

It is easy to see,at least for me, that the example vith Dr.Feller video is not an example of a completely good argument. A valid argument may still have a false conclusion. When we construct our arguments, we must aim to construct one that is not only valid, but sound. A sound argument is one that is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true. Dr.Feller's claim that LLLT is a sham and that LLLT cannot work in general,is a premisse that is false.and he with this statement -quote "So using the rules and precepts set forth by the LLLT industry itelf, LLLT can't work AS THEY CLAIM IT DOES reduced and corrected his more broad statement (can not work at all,it is a sham) Am I right Dr.Feller?