Jump to content

MeetYourMaker

Regular Member
  • Posts

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MeetYourMaker

  1. 13 hours ago, NARMAK said:

    Hey bud, not sure and tbh would also love an answer. 

    I recently got a Derma Pen. Going to hopefully start it March 1st but eventually plan to get a hair transplant in May so i don't think i'd be using it near that area myself for a similar timeframe you asked where the transplant is done. I might however switch to using it more in the crown area. Kinda like what you're asking too. Maybe more within a month though. 

    I don't think there's any real risk of damaging the grafts 1 month post op assuming the clinic actually planted them more down around 3-4mm where they usually area located. 

    Sounds like a plan. I am wondering if using 1.5mm's trauma on the scalp (non-recipient area) affects the recipient area or not. 

  2. Taken from a Turkish HT forum;

    the situation before the HT

    3A45F0FF-27A3-49E7-A5A0-547D45BF2F08.jpg.ee1a6b73eeed9562b4a1eac317427ea7.jpg

     

    65E8723E-24BB-47AE-82B4-6EB0FEE1C8A3.jpg.5c35d13ecfd72b6663cf41afedd2f075.jpg

     

    HT day : (4500 grafts DHI) 

     

    CBDE037E-5166-4C38-8F8F-F60A2FEC70D3.jpg.4b84b3133540686613c9fed9084e1740.jpg

    Six Months Result : 

    A9B0B252-D2A7-4A1A-8129-DC4183BDDB92.jpg.5a4453daa51a742c02a189eae135a793.jpgFB81AF4A-0C09-4DAA-8E4C-70C4A3BD6D1D.jpg.9158535bc0bee5e2980050a2d32649c9.jpg

     

    BEFORE HT - AFTER HT (8 MONTHS) :

    2FC65938-3C77-4D88-BEC1-28C0EF129F37.jpg.723eabe73c1d5af847d07ff54d2747f4.jpg

     

    ONE YEAR RESULT : 

    71C588F8-55F4-472D-B5D0-55995B4B721B.thumb.jpg.6b27dd3c2a54c144bbb956ffc9d56cfd.jpg

    Patient took finasteride 6 months after the surgery; then dropped. 

    4 years after the HT, no finasteride (patient age 44 now) :

    patient.png.408ddf2513df348e1ed6baaa50dbd646.png

     

    Isnt this a dramatic lose from the transplanted hairs or native hairs mostly? It looks scary especially it happens to a man in his 40s 

    Discuss? 

     

     

     

     

    • Confused 1
  3. 10 hours ago, Frustrated said:

    I’m a dual Turkish citizen living overseas and have family members in country who practice both law and other branches of medicine. Will look into this seriously.
     

    greatly appreciate the insights 

    If you know Turkish you should share this result on sacekimisonuclari, they are PRO-ASMED, funded by Erdogan but they wont able to stop you in anyway.  ASMED has many turkish patients at the moment and they should see this failure. 

  4. 11 hours ago, JayLDD said:

    Personally I wouldn't take anyone that puts Bicer or Demirsoy above ASMED seriously. Put simply, their eyes aren't functional or they certainly aren't using them.  Or put more socially acceptably, they lack good aesthetic judgement. Even off the sole basis of success rate. For hairlines Pekiner appears to do good work, although there's not a huge body of work to go off and as others have said he seems to have a larger than average track record of aborted cases (for better or worse) and there are a number of poor results. I would put Keser who he worked with at a clearly higher standard and Keser also has a broader track record to judge from.  HLC is a world class FUE clinic however they have a range of surgeons. 

    For the OP, if you're looking for a megasession that covers the entire balding scalp (hairline/mid/vertex) and graft numbers that are potentially 3k+ I would absolutely consider ASMED primarily. If you're looking for mainly hairline refinement Keser and HLC have earned their strong reputations for this.

     

    Is HLC not suggested for wide bald areas? Their primary success is for hairlines only? 

  5. 22 minutes ago, BLE123 said:

    1. Pekiner
    2. HLC
    3. Bicer
    4. Demirsoy
    5. Asmed

    That would probably be my order of preference if going to Turkey, it depends on your specific case though. The thing with Asmed is that some of the best results I've seen have been from them but they've also had plenty of shoddy ones too, I think most of those were around the time they opened up their new mega clinic and were just trying to cram in as many patients as possible. Their more recent results have picked up again from what I've seen but that could just be the impression I get from those cases posted on here. The most recurring problem I see with their results is a lack of density behind the hairline, which is surprising as they also typically use a higher number of grafts compared to most - yet their donors pretty much always look immaculate so it's kind of confusing to me. Demirsoy is the "budget" option but despite that I hardly if ever see a poor result from him, always good growth and natural looking results. Bicer and HLC are both very reliable, again I can't recall seeing many poor results. Pekiner's hairline work just tips it in his balance for me, I would say he's the best option for lower norwood patients and he's very conservative with regards to the donor.

    Keser I'll leave out for now. His results were among the very best but I haven't seen any recent cases of his and there have been some complaints about him not using microscopes which for some wouldn't be acceptable.

    Thank you for detailed feedback mate, really helpful. 

×
×
  • Create New...